Skip to comments.
Katherine Harris says failure to elect Christians will `legislate sin'
KRT Wire ^
| 8/25/2006
| Jim Stratton
Posted on 08/25/2006 7:47:48 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 521-533 next last
To: RobFromGa
It's like it is being run by people who want to lose.
No viable candidate wants to be a speed bump. So you put up a disposable candidate. She's basically Kleenex.
461
posted on
08/27/2006 9:59:35 AM PDT
by
durasell
(!)
To: Alex Murphy
I think she's just so desperate that she feels she's gotta pull out all the stops.
To: nopardons
Exactly -- it is all about looks because it certainly cannot be adoration of her brainpower!
463
posted on
08/27/2006 10:38:10 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(God Bless America and the men and women who serve in our military!)
To: Clintonfatigued
Her campaign is terrible. A good friend of mine cannot believe anyone on here is still defending her! My only hope is that someone will come up and beat her in the primary!
464
posted on
08/27/2006 10:41:50 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(God Bless America and the men and women who serve in our military!)
To: Clintonfatigued
465
posted on
08/27/2006 11:14:26 AM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
To: PhiKapMom
I hope that, too. But with Leroy Collins, Jr. being pro-abort and Will McBride supporting open borders, all that leaves is the completely unknown Peter Monroe.
466
posted on
08/27/2006 11:22:26 AM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
To: RobFromGa
"It's like it is being run by people who want to lose."
That's what common sense Freepers have been thinking. If I were conspiracy-minded, I would swear that she was being mind-controlled by the left nto deliberately losing this race.
467
posted on
08/27/2006 11:24:28 AM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
To: FloridianBushFan
468
posted on
08/27/2006 11:27:18 AM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
To: Alex Murphy
"Katherine Harris said this week that God did not intend for the United States to be a "nation of secular laws" and that a failure to elect Christians to political office will allow lawmaking bodies to "legislate sin." This is classic "stoopid party," priceless
469
posted on
08/27/2006 11:30:02 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
To: Clintonfatigued
Yea I saw. Just have been busy with work.
She keeps sticking her foot in her mouth. The reason she is going to lose this race is because of herself.
470
posted on
08/27/2006 11:40:26 AM PDT
by
FloridianBushFan
(I support National Security. I SUPPORT HR4437 . Will McBride for US Senate)
To: Republican Party Reptile
Basis of Common Law was customs, which means someone (i.e. the courts and judges) had to take these "basis" and use them to "make up" the Common Law. Courts didn't "make up" the law.
Time to refute your sourceless falsehood again.
"As we have seen the basis of Common Law was custom. The itinerant justices set out by William the Conqueror examined the different local practises of dealing with disputes and crime, filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones, and ended up with a set of laws which were to be applied uniformly throughout the country."
471
posted on
08/27/2006 12:50:24 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: jf55510
There is a legal dispute, the judge decides the case using local custom, practice, etc. That's sorta what I already said.
(and deciding which local custom, practices, etc., to use and not to use).
Arbitrarily? Source, please.
472
posted on
08/27/2006 12:58:30 PM PDT
by
Mojave
To: Mojave
Quote you in full ... "As we have seen the basis of Common Law was custom. The
itinerant justices set out by William the Conqueror
examined the different local practises of dealing with disputes and crime,
filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones, and
ended up with a set of laws which were to be
applied uniformly throughout the country."
who were these itinerant justices??? Why, judges of the court set forth by the Crown.
and what do you call the process these judges of the court were engaged in whereby they examined, filtered, the customs and practices as to ended up with laws to be applied??? Why, they were making up laws via this process.
To: Mojave; jf55510
(and deciding which local custom, practices, etc., to use and not to use). Arbitrarily? Source, please.
Did the orignal poster say "arbitrarily" anywhere in his reply? Or did you just arbitrarily altered someone else's reply?
To use your own quote again "As we have seen the basis of Common Law was custom. The itinerant justices set out by William the Conqueror examined the different local practises of dealing with disputes and crime, filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones , and ended up with a set of laws which were to be applied uniformly throughout the country."
filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones certainly sounds like (and deciding which local custom, practices, etc., to use and not to use).
To: PhiKapMom
A good friend of mine cannot believe anyone on here is still defending her! Just the fundies who want to eject all non-Christians, especially those who don't believe in a creator like tham there hindooos, boodists, and maybe even them joooos, since they don't belong in a Christian Nation.
475
posted on
08/27/2006 2:00:32 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: Clintonfatigued
Walk across Tampa Bay? Go to a local cemetary and raise the dead? Maybe she can guarantee the Bucs a playoff spot...
476
posted on
08/27/2006 2:01:25 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(I LIKE you! When I am Ruler of Earth, yours will be a quick and painless death)
To: Clintonfatigued
I tell you what....
For someone whose campaign and associated harpies seem to LOVE TO rail against the media for causing all of her problems, she certainly knows how to give them more ammo to use against her.
477
posted on
08/27/2006 2:02:55 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq - Go Bucks!!!)
To: JulieRNR21
Well, that makes perfect sense IF you are NOT a conservative afterall! I'm for someone WINNING against Nelson which Harris can't do. McBride or Collins for me. I'm sort of leaning towards Collins because of the name recognition factor plus his dad actually was a good governor.
478
posted on
08/27/2006 2:09:35 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: PJ-Comix
Your vote is wasted on Collins....Harris will win the primary....Hope you'll support her after she does!
She can beat Nelson. The polls are bogus. Nelson's approval rating is not that high & when she gets done informing Floridians that he's been doing nothing for 6 years but voting with the liberals.....she will be elected!
479
posted on
08/27/2006 2:17:18 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Go Katherine "ALL your base are belong to us." Go here: http://www.ElectHarris.org)
To: JulieRNR21
So if Harris will win the primary anyway, then it doesn't hurt to vote for Collins, right?
480
posted on
08/27/2006 2:36:40 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 521-533 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson