Posted on 08/25/2006 9:23:43 AM PDT by veronica
That's an opinion, not a claim, Sherlock. And if you don't know what the WOT is, start reading FR. On the articles page, under All Threads, the fourth choice is WOT.
They just aren't rational, or connected to reality.
"If Hillary is on the Democrat Party ticket,then my vote goes to Rudy. No regrets."
Ditto.
"I haven't noticed Jim on Rudy threads, criticizing him, or objecting to threads with positive articles about him."
I haven't noticed him on any threads that are negative towards Giuliani defending him neither.
"Hitler killed more than 6 million persons. Are you actually comparing Giuliani to Hitler? You are an idiot."
Hiterly is a term used for Hillary Clinton. He wasn't comparing Giuliani to Hitler.
I think I know what the WOT is. And since Rudy Giuliani's sole contribution to it up to this point has been his recommendation of that jackass Bernie Kerik to the Homeland Security post, I'd say the notion that he'd execute this so-called "war" better than any other candidate is a joke.
I could live with Giuliani if if he has a staunch conservative running mate and I can be convinced he is about to die.
So he's agnostic on the matter. Which is why the hysterical anti-Rudy nutters should stop trying to make the case that Rudy is a RINO and not appropriate for discussion at FR.
Just like Presidents Glenn, Hart, and Powell won.
Oh wait, I guess polls two years out mean nothing but name recognition.
"Allen was formerly married to Anne Patrice Rubel until their divorce in 1983. Allen married Susan Brown in 1986..."
He didn't look good to me last year, the year before, or now.
He's a liberal and if the Republicans are hell bent on joining the Democrats in total irrelevance a few years hence, they will nominate the stooge and get what they deserve.
he deserves a fair hearing in our primaries, that's what they are for. let the people decide.
all I can tell you is - the turnaround of NYC, was hardly a "RINO" event. Rudy did things that national republicans wouldn't dare do at the federal level - taking on the ACLU in court to deal with their thwarting of police practices needed to cut crime and deal with the homeless, cutting taxes to revive businesses, using aggressive laws to root the porn industry out of manhattan, reforming city agencies, going after the national endowment for the arts for their anti-catholic museum exhibits, and a huge list of other real accomplishments. and his 9-11 performance on top of that.
everyone has the right to dislike Rudy for other issues, that's their own choice. but he wasn't some "do nothing" republican as mayor.
and I really don't give a damn if he wore a dress as a gag during a charity event. the same people trashing him for that, don't say a word about the Bushes (Laura included) performances at some of the washington press dinners over the years.
Your own posting is anti Rudy for crying out loud. Did you even read it?
In my opinion, advocating Giuliani is worse than advocating John McCain, as Giuliani is much more to the left. How can one call people who call Giuliani what he is, a leftist, a "nutter" and then turn around and agree with people bashing McCain (who I wouldn't vote for neither)? Is that not a double standard?
Yes, and it is always the same small handful of spammers.
NOOOOOOOOO! NOT ANOTHER RUDY THREAD!!!!
Discussing Rudy's socialist past and future socialist agenda equate being insane?
We're not allowed to criticize him on the issues, just grab the KY and bend over is that what your essentially saying?
Rudy is Conservative enough to have served in the Reagan Justice Dept., and to have spoken on behalf of GW Bush at the GOP Convention in 2004.
Nice try. Then why the use of the terms "Hitlary A" and "Hitlary B"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.