Skip to comments.
Straight woman seeks equality under gay-rights law
King County Journal (Seattle area) ^
| 8/23/2003
| Curt Woodward
Posted on 08/23/2006 8:35:50 AM PDT by sionnsar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
So, "Honeywell ... has a zero-tolerance stand on discrimination," but will discriminate in providing umarried-partner benefits based on your partner's gender vis-a-vis your own.
Political Correctness ties itself in a knot again.
1
posted on
08/23/2006 8:35:51 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
To: Libertina; trustandhope; lonevoice; Paperdoll; Maynerd; Bobsvainbabblings; moneypenny; ...
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
2
posted on
08/23/2006 8:36:15 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
To: sionnsar
All partnerships are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Gotta love their consternation.
3
posted on
08/23/2006 8:37:06 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: sionnsar
Liberals and the Gay Lobby have discovered the shoe's on the other foot. Oops!
( No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)
4
posted on
08/23/2006 8:37:21 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: sionnsar
catch 22.
If they deny the claim then they confirm it is special rights for certain sexual behavior.
If they grant the claim then they risk gutting the whole law.
5
posted on
08/23/2006 8:38:23 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: sionnsar
Ah, the Law of Un-Intended Consequences arises AGAIN!.........I hope she wins.............
6
posted on
08/23/2006 8:38:54 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Is Castro dead yet?........)
To: sionnsar
which claims unmarried straight people should get the same domestic partner benefits as their gay and lesbian co-workers.which claims unmarried straight people should get the same domestic partner benefits as their gay and lesbian co-workers. To do others would would be discrimination of sexual preference.
To: sionnsar
ha ha ha ha ha ah ha ha ha ha
8
posted on
08/23/2006 8:39:08 AM PDT
by
eyespysomething
(When you're Chuck Norris, anything + anything is equal to 1. One roundhouse kick to the face.)
To: Blueflag
This little conundrum ought to give them nightmares.........
9
posted on
08/23/2006 8:40:04 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Is Castro dead yet?........)
To: sionnsar
Isn't it great!
I almost fee like contributing to this gals legal defense fund.
To: sionnsar
As one liberal once said with a straight face: "We simply won't tolerate intolerance."
11
posted on
08/23/2006 8:40:57 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: sionnsar
"upholding the claim could set a sweeping new precedent"
Nuts to the "precedent". Do what is right (asking too much of a leftist?).
These people on the left make me sick. They want greater rights, not equal rights.
To: sionnsar
She's gonna knock this out of the park.
13
posted on
08/23/2006 8:41:36 AM PDT
by
Terabitten
(The only time you can have too much ammunition is when you're swimming.)
To: sionnsar
Veterinary benefits for live-in cats or dogs can't be far behind.
14
posted on
08/23/2006 8:42:43 AM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: sionnsar
because upholding the claim could set a sweeping new precedent for Washington businesses. ..I'm sure this very same statement was said awhile back, before Brokeback Mountain became the "norm", but because the "agenda" called for it, even though most Americans opposed it .....oh well, guess legitimate child porn is on the horizon
Doogle
15
posted on
08/23/2006 8:43:28 AM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF...68-73,,..."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
To: sionnsar
WELCOME TO WASHINGTONISTAN!
We are, besides Louisiana, the most idiotic state in the country.
Our motto: "Doing everything we can to drive out business so that we can buy more lattes and kayak all day."
To: sionnsar
laughs at the left. What are they going to do now?
17
posted on
08/23/2006 8:48:02 AM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: bigfootbob
Scott-Moore claims health insurance coverage for her male partner was denied because the unmarried couple is not of the same gender. This gonna be good. Reverse:Reverse discriminations?
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: longtermmemmory
Whoooo Hoooooo.
That's a good one they are twisted into.
I miss Washington, but its no longer the state I grew up in.
20
posted on
08/23/2006 8:48:56 AM PDT
by
zek157
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson