Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revived muscle car to save industry jobs
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | August 22, 2006 | Greg Bensinger

Posted on 08/22/2006 6:59:41 AM PDT by Graybeard58

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Graybeard58

My father in law has had the brakes done in his Malibu 9 times... what a freaking joke...


61 posted on 08/22/2006 9:46:25 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I bought a Camaro LT 305 in 1977. The car was a mechanical and cosmetic Nightmare from day one! Why they are bringing back that beast is beyond me!
62 posted on 08/22/2006 9:48:54 AM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I was born in 50, I have a grey beard, but I never underappreciate a fine and fast machine. I have owned 1 Toyota, a datsun, and a Nissan--all were fairly reliable but basic machines that were/are boring to drive. Course, I am a young buck compared to you--ha!


63 posted on 08/22/2006 9:52:14 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

If you had been 25 and single it would have run perfectly.:>)


64 posted on 08/22/2006 9:53:27 AM PDT by WKB (If I send you a blank reply that means I have nothing else to say to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Is that because the radio turned on but the engine didn't? ;-)


65 posted on 08/22/2006 9:59:41 AM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Ok, I read the whole thread before posting this.

A Camero is a "muscle car"?? No way!!!!! A muscle car is one the guys like, cos it goes really fast, they can tinker under the hood and soup it up, and they can impress the other guys with it. A girl (back in the day,anyway) would rather drive Dad's pick-up than brother's Charger.

Girls (again, back in the day) loved the Camero and Mustang (some even liked the Firebird..poor things). Why? Because they were so CUTE, they went so FAST, and the boys that drove them were both CUTE and FAST!!!

I agree with another poster, why not bring back the old body styles with improvements...but still make sure the cars go really fast and are really bad on gas...that way when I buy one, I'll use it (and the gas) sparingly, appreciatively.

Camero...muscle car...*snort*!
66 posted on 08/22/2006 10:03:38 AM PDT by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blu

After spell check, I changed every spelling of Camaro to the wrong one! duh!


67 posted on 08/22/2006 10:05:10 AM PDT by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: WKB

I had it sold to an 18 year old, he even had bank financing approved, then he found out his insurance payments would be around $300 per month and he backed out.

I finally traded it in and took my beatin' from the dealer.


68 posted on 08/22/2006 10:11:18 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: All

Hubby is a camaro freak. We have both owned numerous camaro's over the years. I sold my 78 RS a few years back. I just sold my 86Z a few weeks ago. I will never own another one. Nothing but shoddy workmanship and overheating problems with every damn one of them.

Hubby still has his 68, which has been parked now for 13 years. He asked me if he could trade it off on the new one coming out. I said NO. The 68 seems to be the solidest camaro out of all of them we have owned. Maybe back in the 60's they still took pride in their cars. I am sure the new one will just be another hastily put together car, that will be junk in a few years.


69 posted on 08/22/2006 10:18:45 AM PDT by LilyBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
I often wondered why some of the Big Three doesn't go back and build the classics with the new technology.

The new tech doesn't fit well with the old bodies and the extra weight and poor aerodynamics would pull down the CAFE. I also wouldn't be surprised if they had problems with crash tests.
70 posted on 08/22/2006 10:23:10 AM PDT by Flying Circus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blu

When Cars were CARS
When Men were MEN
and Women were GRATEFUL!


GM must still think metrosexuals have testicles.


71 posted on 08/22/2006 10:24:30 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Too bad that's Kris Horton's Camaro concept and not the real GM product that's coming.


72 posted on 08/22/2006 10:25:57 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking
Ah. The Camero in its natural environment.
73 posted on 08/22/2006 10:29:03 AM PDT by Flying Circus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid
Too bad that's Kris Horton's Camaro concept

my bad

Doogle

74 posted on 08/22/2006 10:33:32 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF...68-73,,..."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Paint that shiny crossbar and let that bowtie float on a field of black.


75 posted on 08/22/2006 10:37:05 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

I wanted one of the GTO's until I looked at it. The thing would've beat my '66 but GAD!!! What a piece of ugly architecture!!


76 posted on 08/22/2006 10:41:26 AM PDT by Safetgiver (Stinko De mayo, Stinko to the Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
now to throw a wrench in da werks..
personally I like the dodge challenger concept due out next year..*smiles*


Doogle
77 posted on 08/22/2006 10:41:50 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF...68-73,,..."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I didn't start mossing until last lear, and I was born in 1940.


78 posted on 08/22/2006 10:42:33 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer
I didn't start mossing until last lear, and I was born in 1940.

I see you have a 17 year old. That'll do it.

79 posted on 08/22/2006 10:47:43 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver

Yes, the boys and girls at GM really screwed up on the GTO. All they had to do was update the 1965,66 or 67 body and they wouldn't have been able to keep them in showrooms. Combine that with a new 400 c.i. motor with perhaps a blower on top of it, a 6-speed Hurst shifter, and some other goodies, and they would have had a screamer on their hands.

But no, GM had to go with that really ugly Australian platform. Geez, the thing looked like a Toyota.


80 posted on 08/22/2006 10:50:46 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson