Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revived muscle car to save industry jobs
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | August 22, 2006 | Greg Bensinger

Posted on 08/22/2006 6:59:41 AM PDT by Graybeard58

General Motors Corp. will save about 2,500 jobs in Oshawa, Ontario, by building a revived Chevrolet Camaro sports car there in two years, the union that represents the workers said.

Production of the 2009 Camaro will begin at the end of 2008 as part of a $662 million investment, the company's Canadian unit said Monday. GM, the world's largest automaker, made the previous Camaro in Ste. Therese, Quebec, until 2002.

Members of the Canadian Auto Workers paved the way for the decision by agreeing in March to concessions that included shorter break times and use of contract employees.

GM said the investment is designed to give the plant flexibility to build a variety of vehicles. The Oshawa plant now makes Buick Lacrosse, Pontiac Grand Prix and Chevrolet Monte Carlo and Impala cars.

"We are thrilled about this, it means that any job losses will be through attrition, the workers' own decision," Peter Kennedy, a union spokesman, said in an interview. "But this doesn't solve everything. We're hopeful that ($662 million) investment means something else will come in to sustain the business there."

About 100,000 Camaros will be built annually, Kennedy said.

He provided the estimate of jobs saved, from about 6,000 workers at the factory.

The Detroit-based automaker said earlier this month it would bring back the Camaro. GM built the so-called muscle car from 1966 until 2002, when annual sales dwindled to 28,404 from a peak of 260,201 in 1978.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: automakers; camaro; generalmotors; musclecar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: alice_in_bubbaland
Haven't seen a pic of a real Camaro yet, so here ya go a 67(w/454)!



41 posted on 08/22/2006 7:57:22 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Trust can't be bought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland
I had a 69z with the screaming 302. I drove it for 10 years and sold it for 2x what I paid for it. Selling that car was the worst investment move I ever made. (kicking myself all over this thread)
42 posted on 08/22/2006 7:58:43 AM PDT by oxcart (Journalism [Sic])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland
Why, that's Lightning McQueen from the Disney/Pixar movie Cars.
43 posted on 08/22/2006 8:00:30 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Had a '64 GTO w/4-11 gears and 3 deuces. Nothing faster on the road, even if it was only a LeMans with a monster engine. Almost killed myself within the first 10 minutes of getting into the car when the brakes faded the first time I got on them when coming up to a stop light. (ok, I was going a bit fast). The monster got about 8 mpg but gas was only 29 cents a gallon.

Geez, I loved that car.
44 posted on 08/22/2006 8:03:48 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
IMHO, GM is on the wrong track. They seem to be rolling out novelty cars (Camaro, convertible pickup trucks, wannabe PT Cruisers, etc). The GM rental cars I've driven recently are full of gadgets and quirky controls that seem to be intended to "impress". They don't seem to be serious about producing quality cars.

Ford, on the other hand, seems to be serious about competing with Toyota and Honda. Their recent car introductions are decent competition for the Japanese cars: Focus, Five Hundred, Fusion).

Just my two cents...

45 posted on 08/22/2006 8:04:02 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski (No good deed goes unpunished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor
Why didn't they follow the Ford lead and simply spruce-up the original design?

Because they are idiots.

46 posted on 08/22/2006 8:05:03 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oxcart

Ah.....Hugger Orange! Great car, hubby has been all over the East Coast looking for one! The best price w/matching #'s was $32,000. I keep telling him to go for it. but he just can't bring himself to do it. His 1972 Z, brand new, cost him $3,400.


47 posted on 08/22/2006 8:05:15 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (NY Slimes the paper of record for OBL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

LOL! Sorry I don't have little kids anymore (19 & 21). I'm not up on the latest cartoons. Thanks for the info!


48 posted on 08/22/2006 8:07:02 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (NY Slimes the paper of record for OBL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Take one of these, give it a 350HP engine, manufacture it with new technology materials and an interior that is comfortable and modern. I'd buy one in a SECOND.

49 posted on 08/22/2006 8:07:12 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam is a subsingularity memetic perversion : (http://www.orionsarm.com/topics/perversities.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

The problem is that it would make sense.

Imagine if they literally copied curve for curve the outside of that car and put in a modern interior. The ensuring line up to buy would guarantee the job loss of too many suits.

Besides, the chik who thinks there are too many manly men in the world would think it is just a product of paternalism to bring back the muscle car. She believes men should love the Yugo


50 posted on 08/22/2006 8:15:55 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Dismiss every single designer who had anything to do with a production sportscar of GM that was portrayed as "cutting edge".

The Corvette is universally considered to be the best value for the money in the sportscar category, with performance of Porsche at half the price.

51 posted on 08/22/2006 8:49:32 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
What do you drive now?

Toyota and I'm happy with it.

52 posted on 08/22/2006 8:51:19 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I see now why you call yourself Graybeard.


53 posted on 08/22/2006 8:59:23 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
I see now why you call yourself Graybeard.

I barely mossed being a boomer, I was born in '45.

54 posted on 08/22/2006 9:01:31 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Why didn't they follow the Ford lead and simply spruce-up the original design?

****

Because they are idiots.

The crux of the matter seems to be the significant design change after the Camaro's '69 model year. GM has chosen to follow Ford's example in using the *original* original for inspiration, rather than the post-1970 styling.

This apparent division in the Camaro fans' ranks may have a happy side-effect: the car may finally be rid of the mulleted crowd (who seem to prefer the later '70s models).

Hey... it *could* happen. The 'Vette used to evoke driver stereotypes involving disco attire and excessive male jewelry (esp. gold "nugget" pinky rings). Fortunately, that has all but faded away.

55 posted on 08/22/2006 9:04:15 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: angkor
but it's not a Camaro.

It's not a Smokey and the Bandit Era(yeah, I know that was a fire chicken) Camero, but it's nose and quarter panels look alot like a 67.

56 posted on 08/22/2006 9:09:22 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

57 posted on 08/22/2006 9:20:09 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland; kellynla
my brother works on vintage Camaro's full time now... He's looking forward to the new Camaro


58 posted on 08/22/2006 9:23:05 AM PDT by MudPuppy (St Michael Protect Us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

The new camaro looks just like the current mustang...at least to me it does.


59 posted on 08/22/2006 9:29:37 AM PDT by Armedanddangerous (Master of Sinanju (emeritus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Well based on the pictures I've seen of it.. it looks like a "me too" mustang.


60 posted on 08/22/2006 9:33:20 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson