Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. District Judge Who Presided Over Government Wiretapping ... Conflict of Interest
Chronwatch ^ | Tuesday, August 22, 2006 | Judicial Watch

Posted on 08/22/2006 5:33:26 AM PDT by IrishMike

Judge Anna Diggs Taylor Serves as Secretary and Trustee of Foundation that donated funds to ACLU of Michigan, a Plaintiff in the Case

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and judicial abuse, announced today that Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, who last week ruled the government’s warrantless wiretapping program unconstitutional, serves as a Secretary and Trustee for a foundation that donated funds to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan, a plaintiff in the case ACLU et al. v. National Security Agency. Judicial Watch discovered the potential conflict of interest after reviewing Judge Diggs Taylor’s financial disclosure statements, available on Judicial Watch’s Internet Site, www.judicialwatch.org.

According to her 2003 and 2004 financial disclosure statements, Judge Diggs Taylor served as Secretary and Trustee for the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan (CFSEM). She was reelected to this position in June 2005. The official CFSEM website states that the foundation made a “recent grant” of $45,000 over two years to the ACLU of Michigan, a plaintiff in the wiretapping case. Judge Diggs Taylor sided with the ACLU of Michigan in her recent decision.

According to the CFSEM website, “The Foundation’s trustees make all funding decisions at meetings held on a quarterly basis.”

“This potential conflict of interest merits serious investigation,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “If Judge Diggs Taylor failed to disclose this link to a plaintiff in a case before her court, it would certainly call into question her judgment.”

(Judge Diggs Taylor is also the presiding judge in another case where she may have a conflict of interest. The Arab Community Center for Social and Economic Services (ACCESS) is a defendant in another case now before Judge Diggs Taylor’s court [Case No. 06-10968 (Mich. E.D.)]. In 2003, the CFSEM donated $180,000 to ACCESS.)

(Excerpt) Read more at chronwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aclu; activistjudges; annadiggstaylor; blackrobedtyrants; bush; congress; corruption; crime; election; election2006; electioncongress; elections; geopolitics; judges; judicialwatch; liberal; liberalmedia; nsa; rats; scotus; senate; terror; terrorism; terrorists; war; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Jay777

ACLU scum ping


21 posted on 08/22/2006 5:57:44 AM PDT by EdReform (Protect our 2nd Amendment Rights - Join the NRA today - www.nra.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

seems ruth ginsberg should have recused herself from every single aclu case...


22 posted on 08/22/2006 5:58:54 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Russian jet crashed. 179 on board.


23 posted on 08/22/2006 5:59:08 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Sister Boogie Woman Ruth Bader Ginsburg.............


cannot even fathom two ACLU supporters (if not actual members) on SCOTUS !


24 posted on 08/22/2006 6:05:21 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

And the lawyer(s) from the ACLU were Muslim and one at least has been a defender of terrorist.


25 posted on 08/22/2006 6:08:05 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

NO MORE RENEGADE JUDGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!


26 posted on 08/22/2006 6:09:15 AM PDT by redstates4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

IMPEACH THE JUDGE NOW!


27 posted on 08/22/2006 6:09:55 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup ("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mware

Russian jet crashed. 179 on board.
.
.
.
???????????????????
ACLU on a golf outing ?


28 posted on 08/22/2006 6:09:58 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mware

Some one has it posted

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1687935/posts


29 posted on 08/22/2006 6:11:39 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

sorry about posting that here. I thought I was on the ME thread.


30 posted on 08/22/2006 6:11:42 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mware

...I thought I was on the ME thread.
.
.
.
I've done that,
I cannot tell you how many times,
but more than a few.


31 posted on 08/22/2006 6:13:49 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

bump


32 posted on 08/22/2006 6:16:35 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

> If Judicial Watch indeed broke this news, congratulations are in order. Credit where credit is due. <


Yes indeed! And one gets the impression that JW achieved this breakthrough without the services of Larry Klayman!


33 posted on 08/22/2006 6:20:11 AM PDT by Hawthorn (I've seen a lot of white macacas in my time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Judicial Watch discovered the potential conflict of interest
POTENTIAL ???????
34 posted on 08/22/2006 6:21:10 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
She's got to be one of the stupidest judges on the federal bench.

I read some of her ruling...and it is pretty out there. Out in Cynthia McKinney territory in fact.
35 posted on 08/22/2006 6:34:20 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Actually, she like all Liberals believe they are immune from the law.

Bring suit against her and the ABA will come running tosupport her. Write an opinion piece about this and watch how quick it gets printed.


36 posted on 08/22/2006 6:42:59 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("If you liked what Liberal Leadership did for Israel, you'll LOVE what it can do for America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All; MinuteGal; Doctor Raoul; IrishMike; pleikumud; fortheDeclaration; Jason_b; right-wingin_It
What consequences could the conflict of interests have on her decision? I'm not a legal scholar.
This story may become a New Dan Rather disaster for the Demon-Rats. But we need to know what can be done.
37 posted on 08/22/2006 6:44:34 AM PDT by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

This revelation is a real shocker isn't it. Another gem that Jimmie Carter foisted on the citizens of the country.


38 posted on 08/22/2006 6:51:42 AM PDT by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Remember when the left was on Alito's ass for something not half as bad? Or was it Roberts?


39 posted on 08/22/2006 7:22:18 AM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zendari

This is OK as long as she did not go hunting with the Vice President like Scalia.( sarcasm). That would force her to recuse herself per the drive by media standard.


40 posted on 08/22/2006 7:31:45 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson