Posted on 08/21/2006 1:42:19 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
Biometric testing is set to be introduced at European airports as part of stringent new security measures revealed yesterday in the wake of last week's alleged terror plot.
Passengers would have their fingerprint or iris scanned under the measures proposed by EU interior ministers, which would also use passenger profiling to try to identify potential terrorists.
The move to beef up relaxed security procedures in Europe came as John Reid, the Home Secretary, warned human rights would have to be balanced against the threat from terrorism.
Other measures agreed in the wake of last week's terror threat include a commitment to stamping out radicalism by stricter policing of the internet, replacing extremism with a "European" model of Islam, a 250 million research project into liquid explosives and a meeting of security services across Europe this month.
The plan to extend biometric procedures - already enforced in the United States, Canada and Australia - to Europe comes after Mr Reid held talks with ministers from five other European countries. He said Europe would not allow terrorists to undermine the "common European values that bind our societies together".
The proponents of terror "would abuse our open societies, would misuse our freedoms and adapt the latest technology to their evil intent and have no regard for human life or for human rights".
Mr Reid signalled that people would have to give up some of their liberties. "As we face the threat of mass murder we have to accept that the rights of the individual that we enjoy must, and will be, balanced with the collective right of security and the protection of life and limb that our citizens demand."
Ministers from the current Finnish EU presidency as well as future EU presidencies Germany, France, Portugal and Slovenia were briefed along with Mr Reid yesterday by Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, the MI5 director general and Assistant Commissioner Andy Hayman, the head of special operations at Scotland Yard.
Franco Frattini, the vice-president of the EU Commission, in charge of security, said intelligence officials would increase the exchange of passenger information and find ways to censor internet sites that teach bomb-making and other terrorist activities.
Europe should explore "positive profiling of passengers" in order to make border controls more efficient, however he emphatically denied that this would be based on racial or religious grounds. Rather, the profiling would be drawn from biometric information. This would actually speed up airport security procedures, he argued. The plans could also controversially pave the way for an EU-wide database.
Mr Frattini has also suggested that imams could be trained at EU level after concerns that extremists were taking over mosques, while radicalisation across schools and prisons would also come under closer scrutiny.
"We do want a European Islam and that is very important not only to show to the Muslim communities that we fully respect other religions ... but we also want [them to] respect national laws, European laws and fundamental rights - first of all the right to life," he said.
The bloc will look into a suggestion by Nicolas Sarkozy, the French interior minister, to set up counter-terrorism expert teams at EU level ready to help countries if needed, he said.
Mr Frattini said he would make proposals in coming days on "the detection of explosives, on the traceability of commercial detonators and particularly on liquid explosives". These were believed to be at the centre of last week's security threat, when passengers at UK airports were forced to dump any drinks or lotions before boarding flights.
The EU's harmonisation of security restrictions across the 25-member bloc could extend current restrictions on taking liquids on planes across the EU.
Meanwhile, a YouGov poll showed that the government's hardline approach to the threat from terrorists was winning favour with the public. More than half of those questioned for the survey, published in today's Spectator magazine, wanted a "more aggressive" foreign policy. And 55 per cent supported passenger profiling at airports.
Six out of ten believe the government is not exaggerating the terrorism threat while 69 per cent want police to be able to detain terror suspects without trial for up to 90 days - a policy rejected by opposition parties.
Nearly 80 per cent believe "we" are not winning the war on terrorism while 50 per cent believe British Muslims are moderate.
The poll is likely to please Mr Reid, who has seen his public profile soar in the past week. His reaction to the terror threat has boosted his support to mount a challenge to Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, over Tony Blair's succession.
Copyright: The Scotsman -- 8/18/06
What biometric procedures? Granted, it's been two months since I've been on an airplane, but I don't recall any "biometric" procedures.
We travel internationally alot with our business. The only place we were ever fingerprinted (actually, it was just our thumbs) was Sao Paulo, Brazil. We did have body tempurature scans in Asia (during the SARS scare). Nothing similar in Europe. But, we do find security screenings are much more intensive outside of the U.S.
Flying to Riga, Latvia on Monday. Going through Stockholm. I will not fly through London or Berlin right now. Curious to see if anything has really changed.
I saw fingerprint scanners being used on international arrivals in the Philadelphia airport last Monday. It appeared to be only on non-US citizens.
Global police state.
Not a bad idea at all ... not sure if Jews would balk but I doubt the are that superstitious. They may just wash their hands later.
Non-US residents are fingerprinted and photographed each time they come through U.S. immigration...
The first time is to capture their information, and after that to confirm the match. It's an extra layer of security beyond just a passport and takes about 1 minute.
Here's a link:
http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0525.xml
It it's up to me I give the Jews a free pass - based on no known association with terrorists
b
There is no right to fly. If you don't want it, stay home or take a boat.
They have been fingerprinting international travellers to and from the USA for quite some time.
Unfortunately phrased. It is also the individual who has the right to protection and security. When the individual is protected, the collective is automatically protected. It doesn't necessarily work the other way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.