Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

this is liberal logic at its finest.
1 posted on 08/19/2006 6:13:06 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnLongIsland
liberal logic

an oxymoron if there ever was one

2 posted on 08/19/2006 6:15:30 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

They are already the "cut and run" pro-criminal, pro-pervert party. Are they really going to actively become the anti-white-people party? And punish their own candidates? Does this make an iota of sense?


3 posted on 08/19/2006 6:19:29 PM PDT by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

Please don't editorialize with the publication name


4 posted on 08/19/2006 6:19:35 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

Let me get this straight. In 2004 the primaries were so front-loaded that we knew John Kerry would be the Democratic nominee, and since that didn't get him elected, the Democrats are now trying another way to lose?


5 posted on 08/19/2006 6:21:52 PM PDT by Berosus ("There is no beauty like Jerusalem, no wealth like Rome, no depravity like Arabia."--the Talmud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

Complete control from the top is the liberal way.


6 posted on 08/19/2006 6:22:29 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland
The Iron Fist of Democrat Control.

Screw The Little People and Their primaries.

7 posted on 08/19/2006 6:25:48 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

LOL - they threaten a "nuclear option" to keep New Hampshire in line and not try to get back before Nevada. Wouldn't be a hoot if NH moved their primary anyway? The RATs would then have to explain why they were erasing the "will of the people," essentially refusing to count the NH ballots when they strip away the NH delegates.


8 posted on 08/19/2006 6:29:20 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Tom Gallagher - the anti-Crist [FL Governor, 2006 primary])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

They really want to make Hillary their candidate.But they have a problem.A recent poll of New Hampshire democrat voters revealed that more than half would never vote for her.A early loss for her might be the end of her chances-so expand the number of states so she can maybe carry a few states on the first primary.And end up not looking like the total loser that she really is.


10 posted on 08/19/2006 6:33:12 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland
The Democratic National Committee voted Saturday to penalize 2008 presidential candidates who defied a new nominating calendar devised to lessen the longtime influence of New Hampshire and Iowa....

If, and I do mean IF the RNC plays this right, they can help themselves in these two states by blasting the 'rats for trying to "weaken" the impact of the Hawkeye Cauci and NH primary...

11 posted on 08/19/2006 6:46:33 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

The real problem is the ideology of the party. But they haven't figured that out yet.


12 posted on 08/19/2006 7:08:31 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

I have never understood why citizens think it is a good idea that a very few States seem able to pick candidates. I think all these elections should be held Nation wide on the same day. That would be a more fair system.


13 posted on 08/19/2006 7:34:48 PM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland
OOoopsie!

It seems the Deanster forgot that the state governments schedule their primaies - not the DNS chief screamer.

14 posted on 08/19/2006 7:49:55 PM PDT by MrEdd (More cheep than a flock of baby chickens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland

My wife just scowled this evening as she ordered fresh Vermont turkey at dinner and I remarked that I was surprised it was on the menu since I thought Howard Dean was at some big meeting in Chicago - she'll get over it......


15 posted on 08/19/2006 9:12:20 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnLongIsland
So the Dems are now going to defend their threatening states' choices about primaries?

Is this Howie's idea of uniting the party, in order to build it up at the state level? I guess the logic is that NH doesn't much matter, but the other states are ones the Dems need help in, so they give them more prestige and a greater voice in choosing the candidate. But, how is that going to help the party? I have a feeling that even if the primaries were held on one day or on fifty successive ones, the choice would ultimately be the same. I mean, they're Democrats.

16 posted on 08/20/2006 4:06:54 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson