Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamilton Bishop says No to Clinton Appearance at Catholic Counselling Centre (Canada)
LifeSiteNews ^ | 8/18/06 | Hilary White

Posted on 08/18/2006 4:32:28 PM PDT by wagglebee

KITCHENER, August 18, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A family and psychological counselling agency in Kitchener Ontario, the Catholic Family Counselling Centre, is going ahead with plans to have former president Bill Clinton speak at a fundraising dinner in November. The Catholic Family Counselling Centre curiously bills itself as a "non-denominational" counselling agency even though it was established by the diocese of Hamilton in 1952 and retains the name "Catholic".
 
After LifeSiteNews.com reported on the Centre's plan, some Catholics, including the auxiliary bishop, contacted both the Centre with concerns about Clinton's appearance. As president of the United States, Bill Clinton twice vetoed an attempt to ban "partial birth abortion." Clinton has made millions in speaking fees while travelling the world advocating the eugenic-based population control programs of the UN and the libertine values of the sexual revolution.
 
The Kitchener Catholic Family Counselling Centre's director, Mrs. Cathy Brothers told LifeSiteNews.com that the agency will be going ahead with Clinton's appearance despite the complaints. She confirmed that she had spoken with auxiliary Bishop Gerard Bergie of the Catholic diocese of Hamilton, who had asked her to cancel Clinton's appearance.
 
"We're an all inclusive agency that helps all members of the community," Brothers told LifeSiteNews.com. "It isn't our practice to take sides. We respect the opinions of the people you are referring to but we're going ahead with the event as planned."
 
Bishop Gerard Bergie spoke with LifeSiteNews.com, saying, "We're very, very disappointed with that news. We're not in favour and we're not sponsoring Clinton's appearance. It is not appropriate. We'll still try to encourage them to change their minds."
 
Bishop Bergie told LifeSiteNews.com that the diocese would be continuing to try to work with the Centre for a positive outcome. "They have to understand their Catholic mission. Based on that mission there are certain things that would not be appropriate and this is one of them."
 
The Centre informed Bishop Bergie by letter of their plans to go ahead with the event. Bishop Bergie said that thus far the diocese had not made a decision how to respond. He told LifeSiteNews.com that the option of asking the Centre to drop the title "Catholic" would be a matter for Hamilton Bishop Tonnos to decide. "It is up to the bishop to determine what constitutes a Catholic organization."
 
The diocese has no direct involvement in financing the Centre whose funding comes from the government. Bishop Bergie said there has been a long history with the Centre and the diocese. He said, "There's never been anything of this nature before to challenge their Catholic mission to my knowledge."
 
To contact the Catholic Family Counselling Centre:
400 Queen Street South
Kitchener, ON N2G 1W7
(519)743-6333
info@cfcchelps.ca


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billclinton; catholic; impeached42; impeachedx42; loungelizard; moralabsolutes; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Bishop Gerard Bergie spoke with LifeSiteNews.com, saying, "We're very, very disappointed with that news. We're not in favour and we're not sponsoring Clinton's appearance. It is not appropriate. We'll still try to encourage them to change their minds."

Why would anybody think it was a good idea to invite a sex addict to speak at a place like this.

1 posted on 08/18/2006 4:32:30 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer; Coleus; narses; Salvation; Pyro7480

Catholic Ping.


2 posted on 08/18/2006 4:32:57 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; Bellflower; BlackElk; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 08/18/2006 4:33:33 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Well, I am confused. The Bishop says no in the headline, but apparently the speech is still on.


4 posted on 08/18/2006 4:38:12 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
because they are Godless masquerading as Christians.

the RC should make them REMOVE ALL Catholic references under threat of a lawsuit since that's all these scum understand.
5 posted on 08/18/2006 4:46:36 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

The director, Ms. Brothers, is probably a Clintonite fan who simply won't listen to reason - she and Helen Thomas are both cut from the same cloth!


6 posted on 08/18/2006 4:48:21 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Looks like this center is not actually part of the diocese. The bishop doesn't control funding or policy. All he has the power to do is to try to compel them to drop "Catholic" from their name. And it remains to be seen whether he can do even this: I doubt that "Catholic" is a registered trademark.

I sure wish it were. My first priority would be to sue the pants off of the fraudulent, bogus "Catholics for a Free Choice." (Which, in terms of truth-in-advertising, compares with "Vegans for Veal Scalloppini.")

7 posted on 08/18/2006 4:53:30 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("It is Richard, it is Raymond, it is Godfrey at the gate!" --- Chesterton, "Lepanto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: everyone

God bless the Catholic church, but overall, it's not a profile in courage when it comes to standing up to Rat politicians.

The Church is certainly pro-life. But not to the point of risking the real enmity of the Clintons and all the other arrogant Rat politicians, Catholic and non-Catholic, who are in a position to hurt them.

These clowns are even worse, however. Clearly just "cafeteria Catholics." It's one thing to revoke an invitation. It's another thing to actually invite someone of Clinton's ilk, which is what they did.


8 posted on 08/18/2006 5:03:34 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Exactly.

The guy's hubris knows no bounds.


9 posted on 08/18/2006 5:21:06 PM PDT by Fudd Fan ("The purpose of the UN is to ensure that the U.S. never wins another war." -HonestConservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Do they counsel rape victims there?


10 posted on 08/18/2006 5:25:19 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

To contact the Catholic Family Counselling Centre:
400 Queen Street South
Kitchener, ON N2G 1W7
(519)743-6333
info@cfcchelps.ca

E-mail and thank the Bishop, they need to hear from us when they do good things too. LifeSite News forgot the contact info.

gbergie@hamiltondiocese.com


11 posted on 08/18/2006 5:32:58 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Image hosted by Photobucket.com yeah... a dirty old rag!!! 8^)
12 posted on 08/18/2006 5:40:10 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
I doubt that "Catholic" is a registered trademark.

It's not ... and some of our protestant brethren seem to make a career of reminding us that we could save ourselves an awful lot of grief if we did register it. I'm not sure it could be done ... but at least in theory, they have a legitimate point. There seem to be numerous malefactors doing nasty things (like giving X42 a platform) under the colour of being "catholic".

Their name is Legion, for they are many.

13 posted on 08/18/2006 5:56:08 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
But not to the point of risking the real enmity of the Clintons and all the other arrogant Rat politicians, Catholic and non-Catholic, who are in a position to hurt them.

You must not remember Mother Theresa and Cardinal O'Connor BOTH publicly rebuking the pro-abortion position, in the presence of the Clintons.

14 posted on 08/18/2006 6:19:34 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Yes, but Mother Theresa was not in a position of authority (except moral authority). She also wasn't in the U.S.
O'Connor did have a full set, if one may use such crude terminology about a prelate. But still, it's one thing to repeat the pro-life position or even slam the pro-abort position, even in the presence of the Clintons. It's another thing to really DO something against them.

Also, even if the O'Connor example was much stronger, he'd still be just one cardinal, not the Church as a whole, and that's what my point was about.


15 posted on 08/18/2006 6:28:00 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

That is, Mother Theresa didn't live in the U.S. and therefore didn't have to "live with" the Clintons and their ilk.


16 posted on 08/18/2006 6:29:06 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
She may not have had to 'live with' the Clintons, but believe me, they got her message loud and clear, and so did plenty of Catholics.

The Church can't do anything about the Clintons because they aren't Catholic. It really rankles, though, that the Bishops are not more forceful against nominally Catholic pro-abortion politicians in positions of power. Many Bishops are still of the mindset that the Democrat party is the party of the little guy or the poor. They grew up with that blue collar 'Republicans hate poor people' mentality, and I guess it's hard for them to shake.

17 posted on 08/18/2006 6:44:16 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
"Also, even if the O'Connor example was much stronger, he'd still be just one cardinal, not the Church as a whole, and that's what my point was about."

Well yes (sigh) you're right--- but wasn't it ever thus? When it came to the clinch, He had one who betrayed Him, His right-hand man who denied Him, the other nine AWOL, and only John at the foot of the cross.

18 posted on 08/18/2006 6:47:58 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (And Athanasius Contra Mundum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

"she and Helen Thomas are both cut from the same cloth!"

Uhhh, that gives me a shiver! I didn't know there were two pieces of cloth that were that ugly!

Everytime I hear Helen Thomas in a thread invariably some Freeper goes and loads up a picture of her just for kicks.

I'm starting to have gag reflexes at the mere sight of her name.


19 posted on 08/18/2006 6:48:26 PM PDT by incredulous joe ("I went to San Francisco. I found someone's heart." - Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

20 posted on 08/18/2006 7:05:03 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson