To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...
NY Times/NewsBusters Carter's-revenge ping to Today show list.
2 posted on
08/18/2006 4:53:52 AM PDT by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
We can be thankful that this decision wasn't in effect over the last several months, else we might not be talking about a 'foiled' Islamist plot to blow up multiple airliners over the Atlantic. ---
Right on!
3 posted on
08/18/2006 4:56:05 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
(The truth exists even when ignored.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
We can be thankful that this decision wasn't in effect over the last several months, else we might not be talking about a 'foiled' Islamist plot to blow up multiple airliners over the Atlantic. ---
Right on!
4 posted on
08/18/2006 4:56:16 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
(The truth exists even when ignored.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Oops. I guess it was worth affirming twice.
;-)
5 posted on
08/18/2006 4:57:04 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
(The truth exists even when ignored.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Great--I hope the Islamo-Nazis kill them first. See how many "civil liberties" when they're dead.
You can't protect peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
the NY Times wildly applauded the decision, calling it "good news," lauding the opinion as "careful" and "thoroughly groundedThis is completely insane. This was not a judicial opinion. It was a political screed. It had no facts and it's wrong on the law. How can the Times say such things?
19 posted on
08/18/2006 5:22:04 AM PDT by
Bahbah
(Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...and now Steve and Olaf.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson