Posted on 08/17/2006 10:00:19 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
SACRAMENTO, California (Reuters) - California is forging ahead with the most aggressive U.S. program to reduce global warming -- a plan that pits Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger against fellow Republican George W. Bush.
Both the governor and his state's Democratic-led legislature want to make California -- the world's eighth largest economy -- a model to follow with caps in greenhouse gas emissions that the U.S. president rejects.
State politicians still are hammering out differences over the proposed Global Warming Solutions Act. If passed, it is likely to play a role in November's vote for governor and in national politics for years to come.
Schwarzenegger -- branded "very green for a Republican" by the conservation group Sierra Club -- became an overnight hero for environmentalists a year ago by setting a goal to cut California's emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
More recently, he accused fellow Republicans in Washington of lacking leadership on the environment as he signed a global warming accord with British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
"We have a pretty brave governor who feels we should take the lead," said Linda Adams, a Democrat Schwarzenegger chose to run California's Environmental Protection Agency.
The Democrats say their bill gives the governor's 2020 target "teeth" with an enforceable cap on emissions and mandatory reporting for top polluters like energy companies.
If Schwarzenegger vetoes the bill because he wants a more business-friendly version, then the Democrats can use it against him in his reelection bid.
"Given that he has staked a large part of his reelection plea on his environmental record, I don't think he is in a position to veto this bill," said Bill Magavern of the Sierra Club in Sacramento.
Schwarzenegger practiced his balancing act while campaigning on Wednesday by saying the bill will be a "compromised version."
"Some environmentalists will say 'this is not perfect' and there will be other people in the business community who will say 'this is not perfect'."
'CHANCES VERY HIGH'
California is an environment-savvy state where being green wins votes. But it is also the world's 12th largest emitter of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide. It faces environmental and health disasters with warmer temperatures.
Meanwhile, the population is projected to grow from 35 million today to 55 million in 2050.
The California Chamber of Commerce and business groups say the global warming bill is bad for the economy because it will drive up energy prices and send companies running to less regulated places -- similar arguments used by Bush to pull out of the 160-nation Kyoto Protocol to reduce global warming.
EPA secretary Adams is pushing for a more market-based bill to give business tools to meet goals with "no intent to let any sector or company off the hook."
She believes "chances are very high" Democrats will pass a bill the governor can sign by the end of session on August 31.
Bill co-sponsor and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, who is working for the election of Schwarzenegger's opponent Phil Angelides, denied playing politics with the environment by putting the incumbent on the spot before the election.
"We will send a bill he can sign and we want to champion it across the country," said Nunez, who predicted no Republican member of the California legislature would vote in favor. And that momentum, Nunez said, could help the Democrats in 2008.
"I think the 2008 presidential election will be won or lost on environmental degradation and new thinking on the environment," said Nunez.
(Additional reporting by Jenny O'Mara in Sacramento)
yitbos
Meaningless rubbish.
the deadline, 2020, can be moved out.
Hey crz, where does your AZ water come from? You got a dung heap clue? By the by- what is the % that AZ pays in State Welfare, as compared to California?
California is going to make a global warming breakthrough, all right. It is breaking through the top crust of BS and giving birth to the new technology: Flushonomics. Flushonomics is the political technology of flushing the economy down the toilet.
California, it's time for a courtesy flush. You are stinking up the place.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)
Schwarzeneger is announcing the abandonment of California's position as the world's eighth largest economy.
How about giving California back to Mexico ??? Problem solved and we get rid of Feinstein and Boxer.
Maybe they will find a way to cap all of that hot air coming from such as Michael Moore.
Mount Shasta will erupt with such force that the normal resulting ice age will cancel out global warming.
Henny Penny and ducky lucky will not be pleased that the sky isn't falling.
Seaweed aquaculture is a viable and profitable business; California's coast is a little rough for it, though.
It'd be nice if they started by painting the roofs of homes white.
Have you finished your de-salination plants yet? Before you get cut off from drawing so much from the Colo. river?
The only one that hasnt a clue is you BUB!
Of course I had to look that up! Algae blooms do not deplete the dissolved oxygen while they are alive, they create oxygen. The depletion comes when the algae dies and the plant matter decays. But if the plants are harvested for creating ethanol or biodiesel then the oxygen depletion doesn't happen. Also there are easy ways to get extra oxygen into the water if needed.
Unlike most plants algae are free floating and rugged, can take most of what the open ocean has to dish out. The problem with using the open ocean is species contamination and getting the CO2 out there for them to grow. Initially algae farms will probably be expensive enclosed saltwater ponds near the ocean.
I can't help but note that California has already delt with a chunk of it's energy pollution issue by building transmission lines into Nevada (and further) and putting new power plants out in BFE. They're a special legislative exception and are treated as part of California for electic power generation purposes. Bet they are'nt treated as part of California's CO2 budget.
So I suspect Arnold knows he's just moving construction of fossil generation over the state line. Could be a reasonable solution. Unless you live in a neighbor state, even then there are new good jobs which have to be few a far between in BFE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.