Summary
1914ist - edge of the abyss 1938ist - appeasers 1942ist - carry on to victory 1948ist - long term cold war approach, minimal preemption 1972ist - peacenik
Which one are you?
1 posted on
08/15/2006 9:01:11 AM PDT by
schu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: schu
Redo:
1914ist - edge of the abyss
1938ist - appeasers
1942ist - carry on to victory
1948ist - long term cold war approach, minimal preemption 1972ist - peacenik
schu
2 posted on
08/15/2006 9:02:03 AM PDT by
schu
To: schu
1967ist - last chance to fight a war to unconditional victory
3 posted on
08/15/2006 9:04:23 AM PDT by
Comico Atómico
(Which major religion endorses lying to unbelievers?)
To: schu
4 posted on
08/15/2006 9:06:20 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: schu
"Which one are you?"
I'm for killing all the Islamofascists, all their supporters, financers, media fifth columnists, enablers, all their families, friends and relatives tomorrow morning and feeding them to the fish and pigs.
Just in case you were wondering.
5 posted on
08/15/2006 9:06:34 AM PDT by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now courtesy of Islam.)
To: schu
2006, the year of missed opporunities.
I truly believe we will look back on this month as the last chance to prevent disaster.
Sadly, I also believe we will fail in that attempt.
Cheers,
knewshound
Latest article; Flooding the Zone; The coming war against Israel
6 posted on
08/15/2006 9:07:33 AM PDT by
knews_hound
(Driving Liberals nuts since 1975 !)
To: schu
7 posted on
08/15/2006 9:09:01 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(War is not about proportionality. Knitting is about proportionality. War is about winning.)
To: schu
I believe that the current geopolitical situation most closely resembles that of pre WW I. Extreme political alignment into two camps of hegemony, a whole new generation of devastating weapons that need real world testing, and alliances that put virtually all countries in an us-or-them category. The only resemblance to WWII is the anti-semitic rhetoric. Hitler was a far more formidable foe than that unkempt schoolteacher in Tehran.
8 posted on
08/15/2006 9:09:09 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: schu
I'm a 1095ist.
9 posted on
08/15/2006 9:09:12 AM PDT by
oldleft
To: schu
Definitely 1914. The homegrown opposition is for isolationism and the impending war will be fought dirty using WMD's just like WWI. I bet the isolationist sentiment before WWI grew from fatigue over years of adventure under Theodore Roosevelt. Just as in that time, we can't stop because the job is too hard.
Could be an exact replay right down the act that opens it.
12 posted on
08/15/2006 9:12:34 AM PDT by
kinghorse
(I calls them like I sees them)
To: schu
>>But as our crisis deepens, it's worth considering 1914ism, and with it the possibility that all of us, whatever year we think it is, are poised on the edge of an abyss that nobody saw coming.<<
Nobody saw it coming?! Baloney. A transcript of Bush's speech after 911 lets us know Bush saw it coming. That is why we are in Iraq. Imagine the same Rina/syria/lebanon mess with a strong Saddam in Iraq.
Also, if you read the koran or went here you saw it coming:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/696408/posts
I'm a 1938ist, but in the context of my tagline. Except I now think it is 1939. It's gonna get worse before it gets better. A lot worse. It is literally unconscionable to most people in the west just how bad it can be - and probably will be.
13 posted on
08/15/2006 9:12:58 AM PDT by
RobRoy
(Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
To: schu
None of the above. Attempts to draw create false historical analogies are the behavior of sophomoric intellects.
Here is the crucial fact that shatters all the hysteric handwringings and breast beating of the Junk Media Always Whining types.
Our current enemies, all rolled into one "Axis" do not have the power to destroy the USA. We have the power available right now to crush any Conventional Military challenge in days if not hours.
Our enemies know this and will NOT face us across the battlefield. All this bluster and hand wringing in the Junk Media about "What year is it" is merely the prattle of drama queen hysterics with no clue what they are talking about.
History never repeats. The situation is always different if for no other reason then the previous events having all ready happened. This is a problem like no other. Trying to draw false analogies to previous wars is the behavior of room temperature intellects with NO clue about current factual military and political realities.
14 posted on
08/15/2006 9:13:28 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(History shows us that if you are not willing to fight, you better be prepared to die)
To: schu
I'm a 1796ist and think we should call on Horatio Nelson.
16 posted on
08/15/2006 9:15:52 AM PDT by
Skooz
(Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
To: schu
You left out the Armageddonists. We are headed towards teh final battle.
To: schu
I'm a 1776ist
LIBERTY! :o)
22 posted on
08/15/2006 9:18:36 AM PDT by
Anne of DC
(Rummy and the Rebel-in-Chief! What a TEAM!)
To: schu
23 posted on
08/15/2006 9:18:51 AM PDT by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: schu
I tend toward the "1938ist" simply because we have not yet had an incident so massive, so horrifying, that it will convince the donks and other people on the short bus that Islam is out to kill us all or die trying.
Call 911 as equivalent to the "Panay" sinking. It was bad, but compare it to a when a city dies, in a moment. After all, there are 1000 million Muslims who cannot play well with others...
24 posted on
08/15/2006 9:19:13 AM PDT by
jonascord
("Let 'em burn!...")
To: schu
When it comes to Iran, I'm more of a 331 BC kind of guy.
25 posted on
08/15/2006 9:21:28 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(This tagline has been photoshopped)
To: schu
To: schu
The modern world is in 2006. The Islamofascist world is in 1006 (or thereabouts). The clash between these two different worlds is due to the fact that the Islamofacists are awash in oil money while nursing thousand-year-old grudges and religious ideas.
This era may have some similarities to earlier times, but it is quite unique largely for one reason: The modern "westernized" world fights with ridiculous self-imposed restraints, while the Islamofacist world fights a world-wide guerrila war without restraint of any kind other than their failure to conjure and implement an overarching strategy.
32 posted on
08/15/2006 9:36:15 AM PDT by
Wolfstar
(Suffer the little children to come unto Me...for of such is the kingdom of God. [Mark 10:13-14])
To: schu
I'm more of a 1858-1860ist..... George being a hybrid proto-Lincoln type before the Lincoln type actually takes charge.
35 posted on
08/15/2006 9:40:19 AM PDT by
Porterville
(Hispanic Republican American Bush Supporter)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson