Immigration a national security issue (good Canadian piece on Islamofascism)

Immigration a national security issue

London Free Press
Tuesday, August 15, 2006

By Rory Leishman

The arrests last week of 24 British-born Muslims implicated in an alleged terrorist plot to blow up airliners flying from Britain to the United States has underlined once again the perils posed by home-grown Muslim terrorists.

Sohail Raza, national security director of the Muslim Canadian Congress, is alive to the danger. As reported in The Free Press on Saturday, Raza warns that some of Canada's mosques are breeding grounds for homegrown terrorists. He said: "It's a tiny percentage of Muslims, but the message is being broadcast widely. It's very tragic that a minority of so-called Muslims can hold the whole community hostage."

In contrast, Aly Hindi, an imam who holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Western Ontario and presides over the Salheddin Islamic Centre in Scarborough, maintains: "Nobody in any mosque in Canada encourages terrorism."

However, coming from Hindi, such a declaration is hard to credit, inasmuch as he is a self-professed friend of the notorious Khadr family.

Ahmed Said Khadr, the family patriarch, was killed in a shootout with Pakistani soldiers near the Afghanistan border in 2003. All four of his Canadian-born sons are believed to have undergone training in al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan. And one of those sons, Omar Khadr, is in detention in Guantanamo Bay, charged with the murder of a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan.

Like Raza, Tarek Fatah contends there are extremists among Muslim leaders in Canada. Indeed, on Aug. 3, Fatah announced he had resigned as the communications director of the Muslim Canadian Congress because he fears for his life and the safety of his family.

While Fatah claims to have received many death threats, he was particularly upset by an article published on June 30 in which Mohamed Elmasry, national president of the Canadian Islamic Congress, denounced him as one of four people who are "behind today's wave of anti-Islam vitriol" in Canada. (For the record, the other three listed by Elmasry were Globe columnist Margaret Wente; David Harris, former chief of strategic planning for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service; and "Rory Leishman who writes for The London Free Press.")

Elmasry charged Fatah "is well known in Canada for smearing Islam and bashing Muslims." In response, Fatah contends this statement is akin to the issuance of a fatwa pronouncing blasphemy -- a crime punishable by death under Muslim shariah law.

The Muslim Canadian Congress is clearly a fringe group on the left among Canadian Muslims. It has renounced shariah law and endorsed same-sex marriage, but it hardly qualifies as a voice of Muslim moderation in foreign policy. It recently denounced Israel for "acting like an unleashed pit bull set loose among the innocent children of Lebanon."

Elmasry is no less vitriolic. In an article published in the Kitchener-Waterloo Record on July 25, he wrote: "The merciless killing of innocent Lebanese civilians (including women, children, the elderly and the disabled) and the savage destruction of Leb-anon's infrastructure are testimony to Israel's criminal malevolence."

With supposedly moderate Muslim leaders resorting to such inflammatory rhetoric, is it any wonder we have a problem with homegrown Muslim terrorists in Canada?

As in Canada, so in Britain, there is profound concern about the degree of alienation and disaffection within the country's Muslim population. In a speech on national security last week, British Home Secretary John Reid said mass migration can bring benefits, but warned it "can also carry insecurity into the heart of our communities." He added: "We have to get away from the notion that anyone who wants to talk about immigration is somehow a racist."

Michael Portillo, a Conservative and former British defence minister, concurs. In the Times of London on Sunday, he wrote that Britain had imported terrorism unwittingly "by pursuing liberal policies on immigration (and) extending asylum to those who faced 'persecution' without much reflection on why they found themselves in that position."

Are any Canadian MPs likewise concerned about the urgent need for immigration and refugee reform? If so, will they please also stand up and speak out on these vital issues of national security?

The aforementioned Elmasry article is available on-line at:
http://www.canadianislamiccongress.com/ar/opeds.php?id=2933

"Sohail Raza, national security director of the Muslim Canadian Congress, is alive to the danger. As reported in The Free Press on Saturday, Raza warns that some of Canada's mosques are breeding grounds for homegrown terrorists."

Well, SURPRISE, SURPRISE! Welcome to the Twenty-First Century, Rip Van Winkle...

He said: "It's a tiny percentage of Muslims, but the message is being broadcast widely. It's very tragic that a minority of so-called Muslims can hold the whole community hostage."

We all feel your pain. If you are sincere and truthful, and it's only a "tiny percentage of Muslims... holding the whole [Muslim] community hostage", then stop letting them be the ones who speak for your religion.

If their behavior really is "contrary to Islam", then put a a stop to these false Muslims who's actions sully your religion's reputation.

Clean up your own mess, ask for help if you need it, but identify the troublemakers to the authorities at the very least. This really is a situation where Muslims are either part of the solution or they are part of the problem.

Talk is cheap. Actions count. Your move.

Muslims with bombs isn't the problem, Muslims with votes are the problem. Their physical presence is the problem. Their effect on the culture is the problem. Even a small number has a profound effect on politics and the culture, they've already changed Britain, for example. Terrorism is a secondary issue.

Agreed:
Just prior to Canada's 2004 national general election, infamous far-left, America-baiting then Liberal MP Carolyn Parrish was compelled, because of electoral redistribution (redistricting) to run against another, more moderate also sitting Liberal for that Party's nomination in her electoral district.

Her final ultra thin margin of victory was achieved by the last minute arrival of bus loads of 'instant Liberals' trucked in from the local Mosque.

Canada also has a growing problem in certain urban areas, especially around Toronto, of tribally voting, self-ghettoized ethnic groups - not just Muslims - hijacking the political Parties' (mainly Liberal) local Riding Associations (like District ones Stateside).

In one GTA (Greater Toronto Area) Riding which I know well, in the 2006 election all of the major Parties' candidates were Punjabis even though that particular ethnic group is barely a two digit demographic therein.
Apparently memberships were mass purchased for each Party & then many of the same people attended & voted at all the respective nomination meetings.
While doing so violated each Party's internal rules, unfortunately it isn't a criminal offence.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.