Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton Blasts Bush's Anti-Terrorism Record
WCBSTV ^

Posted on 08/14/2006 1:08:15 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: weegee

The chance of that is zero, but I sincerely wish you luck.


81 posted on 08/14/2006 1:59:47 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

The Clintonistas sat and watched while terrorists attacked U.S. interests repeatedly. The list of attacks is very long, but just two examples: 1)the attack on the US Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya which killed a couple of hundred people. The chemicals used were supplied by Iraq (which was controlled by Saddam Hussein at the time); 2) the first attack on the World Trade Center, which also involved Iraqis under the direction of Saddam Hussein.
Now, the Dumbocrats say there is no connection between the Iraq war and the war on terrorism, that Iraq is an expensive diversion from the war on terror!!! Their brains are filled with cotton, hay and rags.


82 posted on 08/14/2006 2:00:12 PM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary! blasts ball.

83 posted on 08/14/2006 2:14:49 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
[Hillary]...criticized the Bush administration for failing to do enough to protect the country from terrorists.

Except for the wire taps they complained about, and the secret prisons they complained about, and Gitmo they complain about, and the terrorist financial monitoring they complained about, and the added security they complained about, this administration has allowed... well... no attacks on US soil since 9/11, but they're still out there planning something!

84 posted on 08/14/2006 2:15:44 PM PDT by infidel29 ("The Democrat Party is like a mule. It has neither pride of ancestry nor hope of posterity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

"Remember the FALN terrorists."




It is so interesting to look back throughout the 90's and see who the Clintons considered the greatest threat to American soverignty. There isn't a better example of this than the Clinton's administration's reaction to the first WTC attack in 1993...and the event that followed only several months later.

Unlike the federal resources and public display that were allocated for the seige at Waco, the 1993 WTC attack was treated as a mere criminal act. Were Janet Reno and Bill Clinton refused to identify the WTC attackers as Islamic fundamentalists and the terrorists they were, they...and their media brethren had no problem identifying the situation at Waco as a Christian fundamentalist problem.

From the release of the FALN terrorists...to the continued funding and support of the Indonesian government while Christians were being murdered...to even the Balkans, it was obvious who the Clintons considered the greatest threat to peace. Just looking at how Clinton treated the OKC bombing compared to the 1993 WTC attack exposes this hypocrisy. Were Clinton called-out Rush Limbaugh and right-wing "hate-radio" as responsible for the OKC bombing, he didn't have nearly the same condemnation for those responsible for the WTC attack.

It's such hypocrisy to listen to liberals whine about terrorist surveillance and profiling when the Clinton admnistration did many of these same things...targeting American militias and bringing many of them under suspicion, while continually ignoring the greater threat. What's perhaps most ironic is that even through all the appeasement, concessions (Clinton and Barak) and even hostility towards Christians that Clinton showed (Serbia, America, Indonesia, etc), radical Islam was still attacking us...and planning even more attacks (9/11/01).


85 posted on 08/14/2006 2:39:31 PM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This POS has not told the truth about anything in years.


86 posted on 08/14/2006 2:51:28 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Sure couldn't match old BlowJobBilly's record.


87 posted on 08/14/2006 3:00:40 PM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She drinks from Nasrallah's cup.


88 posted on 08/14/2006 3:01:32 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

STFU, Hillary. You're going down -- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1683604/posts


89 posted on 08/14/2006 3:02:51 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Peach; Mo1

Gee, no attacks in 5 years, many terror plots foiled (some we won't know about) and terrorist funding and communications being cut off in spite of leaks from the Clintonistas and the Slimes.

Hillary's wet dream would be able to do as well. And she wouldn't.

disgusted white trash power beotch ping


90 posted on 08/14/2006 3:04:11 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I am a proud friend of Israel. We're all Jews now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hillary only knows of 4 blasts:

The blast of the OKC Federal Building
The Kobar Towers blast
The USS Cole blast
And her husband blasting his fluids on Monica's dress!

91 posted on 08/14/2006 3:54:34 PM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Don't know if I'm repeating someone else, but the simple explanation is this: she expects another attack at some point and wants to be on record condemning our efforts before the fact. Simple. and Evil.


92 posted on 08/14/2006 3:59:17 PM PDT by XavierLarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

"Hillary's wet dream would be able to do as well. And she wouldn't. "

Hey ... The Lunatic President from Iran seems to pushing for Hellary's national healthcare


Video: Ahmadinejad on 60 Minutes
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/13/video-ahmadinejad-on-60-minutes/


93 posted on 08/14/2006 4:05:48 PM PDT by Mo1 (Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Every time I see that picture, it is a stark reminder that there is often no connection between age and maturity!


94 posted on 08/14/2006 4:09:39 PM PDT by CarolinaGOP ("A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both." - Dwight D. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Mrs. Clinton... the Bush administration's record on taking care of the terrorists speaks for itself.

If you've forgoten... they started it on 09/11/01, the U.S. with the help of some good allies are in the process of finishing it.

95 posted on 08/14/2006 4:09:48 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"I don't think our long-term strategy for homeland security is yet what it needs to be," she said"

Why didn't they ask her which strategy the Impeached one used when he was in office - so we can use that one!!

She & her scummy side-kick so called husband are a disgrace to our country.

96 posted on 08/14/2006 4:10:21 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I have an idea, let's explore the Clinton terrorism record first. Like how Clinton let Bin Laden go free.

http://www.cafenetamerica.com


97 posted on 08/14/2006 4:12:12 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Too bad a few freepers can't put up a huge signboard at every home Yankee game which says "Yankees championship record while Hillary Clinton has represented them: 0!"


98 posted on 08/14/2006 4:13:15 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cwb
Democrats want to use this threat to employ and expand the government workforce…

Excellent point.

99 posted on 08/14/2006 5:39:59 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: cwb

And, I should add, this is the equivalent of politica war profiteering.


100 posted on 08/14/2006 5:40:37 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson