Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At 40, is NOW what it set out to be then?
The Boston Globe ^ | August 14, 2006 | Cathy Young

Posted on 08/14/2006 6:29:09 AM PDT by A. Pole

EARLIER THIS month, amid relatively little media fanfare, the National Organization for Women celebrated its 40th anniversary.

[...]

NOW's 1966 statement of purpose declared: ``The purpose of NOW is to take action to bring women into full participation in the mainstream of American society now, exercising all the privileges and responsibilities thereof. . . .

[...]

While paying lip service to the idea of equal parenting, NOW has steadfastly opposed efforts to broaden the rights of divorced fathers. With the exception of a few chapters, it has staunchly opposed such proposals as joint custody and mediation instead of litigation. Ten years ago, NOW issued an ``Action Alert against fathers' rights," which accused divorced men who seek a role in their children's lives of abusing power ``in the same fashion as do batterers."

[...]

Today, it's mostly boys and young men who are on the short end of educational inequality -- as high school and college dropouts and the ``missing persons" on college campuses. Yet NOW has nothing to say on this issue.

While NOW has done important work in spearheading legislation to combat domestic violence and aid victims, it has also helped perpetuate a gender-biased, one-sided view of the problem in which men are virtually always the abusers and women virtually always the victims -- despite abundant research suggesting a far more complex picture.

[...]

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: andreadworkin; butimasinglemom; children; divorce; family; feminism; feminizm; helenreddy; jobs; marriage; nags; now; radicalfeminists; schools; women

1 posted on 08/14/2006 6:29:10 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Thank NOW for making dating more difficult. And thanks FR for deleting my article post for no reason. Real classy of you.


2 posted on 08/14/2006 6:35:57 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

NOW set out to undermine the family, convince women they were nothing if they didn't work outside the home and that men were an impediment to women's sense of self.

I'd say they succeeded quite well for a while.


3 posted on 08/14/2006 6:36:14 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

NOW was never even THEN.

They are a microscopically tiny number of shrill voices given prominence only by the collusion of the sympathetic MSM.

They refuse to divulge the numbers of their membership which, given the high profile and worshipfully grovelling coverage they have enjoyed for 40 years, should be in the millions.


4 posted on 08/14/2006 6:36:28 AM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
N - Nagging

O - Old

W - Women......

5 posted on 08/14/2006 6:37:25 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Birkenstocks, Depends & Bad Haircuts....

This is NOW today.


6 posted on 08/14/2006 6:39:43 AM PDT by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

If not for NOW, ugly lesbians would be without an action group.


7 posted on 08/14/2006 6:43:37 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

So first you purchase large blocs of stock in the lesbian sex toy business, then set up an front org. to allow huge manly grotesquely overweight ugly porker lesbians to sign up, then sit back and rake in the dough!


8 posted on 08/14/2006 6:48:54 AM PDT by Doc Savage (Bueller?....Bueller?...Bueller?...Bueller?...Pelosi?...Pelosi?...Pelosi?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Recent accompishments:

1. Abandoning all semblance of principle to defend a sexual predator-rapist president.

2. Joining the chorus which holds that it's none of our business when we see the total subjugation of women by the most genuinely misogynist ideology in the past 1000 years (that'd be Islam).

Way to go girls!

9 posted on 08/14/2006 6:49:08 AM PDT by Monti Cello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

N.O.W.'s main legacy has been making men into women and women into men and teaching both groups of morphed "ladies" to claim they are proud of their self-destructive social mutation.


10 posted on 08/14/2006 6:54:23 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

People don't know that lesbians were banned from the organization, but in less than a decade, lesbians had infiltrated it and shortly after won total control.

Now was largely destroyed as an effective force by it's total submission to President Clinton.


11 posted on 08/14/2006 7:12:04 AM PDT by ansel12 (Life is exquisite... of great beauty, keenly felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson