Posted on 08/13/2006 12:39:36 PM PDT by omega4179
http://ak.imgfarm.com/images/ap/ADDITION_CUBA_CASTRO.sff_NY110_20060813062244.jpg This is one of four photographs published Sunday Aug. 13, 2006 by Cuba's Communist Youth newspaper's online edition Juventud Rebelde proporting to show The first photographs of Fidel Castro since his illness two weeks ago. Castro holds a copy of the Saturday Aug. 12, 2006 edition of Granma, the Communist Party newspaper. The headline reads "Absolved by history." The Associated Press cannot verify the authenticity or the date when these photographs were shot. (AP Photo/HO)
Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All right reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The actual newspaper was printed with red ink
sounds like CNN is playing with photoshop
cannot find that one
Yes it does look photoshopped
Look closely at the two photos at Sticky Notes and compare the photo of the newspaper held by the ordinary guy with the same edition held by Castro -
not only is the color of the headline changed, but the RIGHT MARGIN of the newspaper in the hands of the ordinary guy is much wider than in the newspaper purported to be held by Castro
Thanks for the link - he's got something there...
Saw it on TV as I was channel surfing. I had just read the article here, and the first thing I thought was.....that's not the same picture that was posted here. It was clearly in a "normal" paper format, but it had the black headline rather than the red one, and I didn't see any sign of the staple. They showed the picture two or three times.
CNN is apparently doing a bang-up propaganda job then
IT'S STAPLED TO HIS FINGER !!!
ROFLOL
They had to staple the paper to his finger to get it to stay in place.
could be
"Sometimes we miss the forest for the trees. Why would Castro pose for these shots, including pictures of him on the phone, when he could have just as easily have had someone film or tape him giving his birthday message? Why pose with a dated newspaper?"
Why not? Why would you pretend an 80 year old guy who is deathly ill in the hospital is alive when he isn't? There is no upside to pretending he's alive when he isn't. The conspiracy theory is far less credible than the non-conspiracy theory.
One would have to believe that Raul is quietly killing all of his possible political opponents before making the announcement. It's possible but much less likely than the obvious probability that Fidel is still alive. A video could have just as easily been pre-recorded as some photos.
Caption on CNN reads "Happy Birthday Fidel"...instead of the more journalistic "Castro turns 80". And they wonder why the MSM is called the liberal media.
"Happy Birthday Fidel"...
No way!
Conspiracy theory? There is certainly an upside for brother Raul to delay the announcement of his brother's death so he can consolidate his control over the country. It is far better to drag it out so that the public is conditioned to the fact that Fidel is seriously ill and possibly dying. I am sure that Raul is concerned about the public reaction and the reaction of Cuban-Americans if they learned that Castro died suddenly. Also, there are also the pedestrian matters of arranging for the funeral and burial, which will involve many heads of state coming to the country. This will be a major PR event requiring lots of preparation and logistics.
I have never heard of an instance in a Communist state where the leader [read absolute dictator] formally and publicly passed the reins of power to someone else while he underwent an operation. Have you?
One would have to believe that Raul is quietly killing all of his possible political opponents before making the announcement. It's possible but much less likely than the obvious probability that Fidel is still alive. A video could have just as easily been pre-recorded as some photos.
I answered why Raul may be delaying the announcement. A video is not as easy to doctor and pose as still photos. I wonder if they would have included a newspaper in the video. To me, this whole show is just a case of the dog not barking. Castro and his ilk manage the media to stay in power. They are masters at it.
The photos are real and have not been doctored. He looks gravely ill however. My guess is that he has a malignancy, probably colon Cancer. I'd give him three months at the most.
Or brother of dead dictator concocts story to assume power and avoid being a victim of a coup.
Make your own:
Oh, and the paper headline was printed in red in the real newspaper. The photo is a phake.
The thing I notice most is the difference in the apparent age of the individuals. In the "hospital" shot, he looks 20 years younger, his beard is darker and fuller, his face is fleshier and he does not exhibit the liverspots that are prominent on his face in the most recent picture of him shown on the right. A little makeup would cover the spots, all right, but how did they plump up his skin and augment his facial hair? (I know it can be done. Are they desperate enough?) I think there are a couple of conclusions: 1. Not the same person; 2. Same person, separated by ten years or so; 3. Same person, loaded with makeup, collagen, hair weavings, and dye.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.