Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/12/2006 4:17:25 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pokey78

They should not be lulled to sleep with the false statement that is only a few among them. They are so wrong.


2 posted on 08/12/2006 4:18:55 PM PDT by ladyinred (Thank God the Brits don't have a New York Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

"...witness all the absurd theories about 9/11 and 7/7..."

I hadn't heard the conspiracy theories about 7-7, as opposed to 9-11. Anyone have a link to such URLs? Just curious...


3 posted on 08/12/2006 4:22:04 PM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

It is amazing. These socialist-driven countries let them in, then whine about it. What in the heck did they expect?? And there will be more, around the globe, as long as these radical Islamo-freaks are allowed to function in the countries they hate....


4 posted on 08/12/2006 4:23:27 PM PDT by EagleUSA (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
None are so blind as those that will not see.

L

5 posted on 08/12/2006 4:23:49 PM PDT by Lurker (I support Israel without reservation. Hizbollah must be destroyed to the last man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The country may indeed be in its greatest danger since the second world war, as John Reid, the home secretary, said last week. But as Britain prevailed then, so it will again.

We are witnessing the most formidable anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-life collective in the history of mankind.

7 posted on 08/12/2006 4:32:32 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"Most of this relatively small group of fanatics are British-born Muslims who have been educated here and brought up within our tolerant democracy."

There are over 1 1/2 million Muslims in that small country.

From the CIA World Factbook:

Population:

60,609,153 (July 2006 est.)

Religions:

Christian (Anglican, Roman Catholic, Presbyterian, Methodist) 71.6%, Muslim 2.7%, Hindu 1%, other 1.6%, unspecified or none 23.1% (2001 census)

8 posted on 08/12/2006 4:33:56 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --pre-Road-Map President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

I'm sure glad the USA version of islam is a religion of peace.


10 posted on 08/12/2006 4:39:18 PM PDT by umgud (Gov't needs a Department of Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"Why is Britain such a breeding ground for these young men, for that is what most of them are?"

Here's the answer as excerpted from the YouGov poll of British people:


YOUGOV / DAILY TELEGRAPH RESULTS
Sample: 1,633; fieldwork: July 24-26, 2006


As you probably know, the recent violence followed the kidnapping of three Israeli soldiers, one in Gaza and two in southern Lebanon. Which of the following statements comes closer to your own view?



Israel has the right to defend itself and the Israeli attacks in Gaza and the Lebanon have been an appropriate and proportionate response to the kidnappings
17
Israel has the right to defend itself but the Israeli attacks in Gaza and the Lebanon have been an inappropriate and disproportionate response
63
Neither/Don't Know
20


Some people say the Israelis have brought the present violence on themselves by refusing to withdraw behind their original borders and by taking over Palestinian land in the West Bank. Do you think the Israelis have, to any extent, brought the present violence on themselves?



Yes, there would be fewer attacks and a real chance for peace if Israel withdrew behind its original borders
40
No, the opponents of Israel will always attack Israel and try to destroy it, no matter where its borders are
35
Don't know
25


How would you rate the American administration's performance in the current crisis?




Excellent

1

Good

4

Fair

18

Poor

32

Very Poor

27

Don't Know

18



Which of the following statements comes closer to your own view?




Tony Blair in the current crisis gives the impression of making up his own mind and taking his own line

15



Tony Blair in the current crisis gives the impression of siding with the Americans, whatever the Americans say

64



Don't know

21




...and an older survey.


ICM (Poll of British people)
ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,000 adults aged 18+ by telephone on 20-21st April, 2002. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults.
. . .
"Q3. In the dispute in the Middle East between Israel and the Palestinians, from what you have seen and heard about the conflict which of the two do you sympathise with more, Israel or the Palestinians?"

Israel           14%
Palestine      28%
Both            14%
Neither         23%
Don't know   20%

11 posted on 08/12/2006 4:39:48 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --pre-Road-Map President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
While the Times wrings its hands, the answers are fairly simple.

1. Suspend civil liberties for Muslims.

2. Stop all immigration Muslim immigration.

3. Arrest all imams who preach hate.

4. Round up the 1500 "most likely" suspects and hold them until we can decide what to do with them.

5. Do not let them travel on airplanes or any other form of public transportation until they have been throughly vetted by the security services. This might take some time, too bad.

If they continue their terrorist activities, close all the mosques. These measures may sound harsh and undemocratic, even un-politically correct but we are at war and if we are going to win, we are going to have to push back, hard and fast.

13 posted on 08/12/2006 4:49:56 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

The Brits are, as usual, blaming themselves. The US, with its "intolerant" policies, has actually not been that much more successful in discouraging Muslim killers; we have just been more successful in catching them before they do any real damage. But our Muslim inhabitants, including native and foreign born and converts, have certainly been trying.

It's probably going to take a few more attacks for Britain to learn the only history lesson worth learning: Islam is a cult built on violent conquest, and there is no way of dealing with it other than opposing it head-on and defeating it.

Muslims make good citizens of non-Muslim countries only when they think Islam is powerless to conquer those countries. But even then they don't stop trying. Some Muslims, mostly poor laborers and farmers, had been permitted to stay in Spain after the expulsion of the Jews and Muslims in 1492, but in about 50 years, they were all deported - after having wiped out some Christian villages on the Mediterranean coast, torturing the priests to death, and then being caught receiving weapons smuggled in from Muslims in the Middle East.


14 posted on 08/12/2006 4:50:42 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Instead of wringing our collective hands about the unfairness and difficulty of it all, I have a better idea. It works. It has been done before in recent history. It just takes some determination and guts. But it also takes throwing out the toxic PC bilgewater we are all drowning in.

When international Communism and subversion was a deadly threat, we banned the Communist Party. So, ban the Muslim party. If they don't like it, they can go back to wherever they came from before they turn our countries into clones of the hell holes from which they came!

18 posted on 08/12/2006 5:00:17 PM PDT by Gritty (Laws should treat an Islamic outlook as excludable on political, not religious grounds- S Trifkovic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

When voices spoke up opposing the radical change in British immigration policy in the 1960s, arguing that the multiculturalism being thus imposed was without parallel in a thousand years of British history and portended a serious danger of violent conflict, they were branded as racists and their objections were declared outside the bounds of legitimate debate.

Because the enlightened liberals who controlled British policy had no strong attachment to Christianity or British culture, they did not and do not comprehend the strength and depth of commitment to Islam and their native culture that the muslim communities have. Ironically, we see this more in the second generation immigrant than the first; the first generation at least voluntarily chose to come settle in Britain, whereas the second generation had no choice in the matter, and is proving a more fertile ground for Islamofascism.


20 posted on 08/12/2006 5:01:16 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

bttt


24 posted on 08/12/2006 5:09:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

"It is now self-evident that there is an enemy within Britain who wants to destroy our way of life"

Yep, its called ISLAM


26 posted on 08/12/2006 5:24:12 PM PDT by observer5 (It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

If terror is to be defeated, you have first to drain the swamp.

If you're going to drain a swamp the first thing you do is
blow the dam.


28 posted on 08/12/2006 5:27:02 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The great challenge for Britain is how to stop this and minimise the future risks.

Make the UK a moose free zone.

29 posted on 08/12/2006 5:53:01 PM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Edward I/England 1291;
Ferdinand of Aragon & Isabella of Castile/Spain 1492
These monarchs did not engage in battles for "hearts and minds" [although Ferdinand & Isabella employed Inquisition in the battle for souls]. They believed it to be easier to merely clear the hearts and souls in question out of their corresponding realms, and were satisfied with it. Edward I could probably be used as a legal precedent for UK.
32 posted on 08/12/2006 6:20:37 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

This stupid article acknowledges that the damned animals were hard to spot because they were so completely integrated, running shops and enthusiastic about cricket.

Then it suggests that the problem is that muslims haven't been "integrated" well enough.

The problem is that they are muslims, and muslims want to take over the world by force.


45 posted on 08/12/2006 11:44:55 PM PDT by watchin (Facts irritate liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson