the Koran clearly articulate that this type of activity is outside of bounds for Muslims." Really ? Then why Al-Qaida, Hezbollah, Hamas and other terror groups find justification for their terror acts in Koran ? And why "Moderate" Muslims are not as angry at those who use Koran as justification for terror as they are angry at those who simply point at the connection between terror and the teachings of Islam ?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: Convert from ECUSA; SJackson; veronica; Yehuda; Alouette; JewishRighter; pbrown
Global Jihad/Jihad in America PING !
To: sergey1973
That's a lame Barf Alert. Here is a real
BARF ALERT.
3 posted on
08/12/2006 12:16:08 PM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: sergey1973
He said it was wrong to link the actions of violent Muslims to their religion.Translation:
They're on to us, so we must deflect attention away from that fact.
4 posted on
08/12/2006 12:16:17 PM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Don't mess with Israel.)
To: sergey1973
I guess Dubya just lost the Muslim vote in his re-election bid. :)
5 posted on
08/12/2006 12:16:34 PM PDT by
kesg
To: sergey1973
They are upset about his use of terms like "Islamic fascists", which he used this week both for Hezbollah and the suspected bomb plotters held in the UK.
**
And loyal Americans like me cheered when he finally called them by their right name.
6 posted on
08/12/2006 12:17:37 PM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Never trust Democrats with national security.)
To: sergey1973
If they don't like it, they're free to leave. Leftists also seem to get offended when I point this out to them.
To: sergey1973
Like we give a sh** what angers muslims.
8 posted on
08/12/2006 12:18:03 PM PDT by
calex59
(The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
To: sergey1973
In the days after the horror of the 11 September attacks, President George W Bush made a point of saying Muslims per se were not America's enemy.Well, he was mistaken then, and now he is making up for it, Ahmed.
To: sergey1973
As a caller to Rush said, The only thing we want to hear out of you is loud condemnation of the killers and a promise to weed them out of your midst.
11 posted on
08/12/2006 12:19:21 PM PDT by
Marylander
(Please stand behind the tagline.)
To: sergey1973
They can complain to me when they form a Muslim version of the 442d Combat Regiment and earn the honors that the 44Deuce did, until then they can STFU!
14 posted on
08/12/2006 12:21:47 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: sergey1973
President Bush should have added to the term
"Islamic fascists" islamic fascist M/F's !
This group of people have defamed themselves and continue to do so at every opportunity . Who can blame the rest of us that
now both suspect and dislike them?
To: sergey1973
Don't like harsh words? HA! These are the good old days for you Islamist trash.
|
|
|
To: sergey1973
"It offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims," Ahmed Younis said.If they're moderate and non-fascist, why would they be offended? If the shoe fits, I guess.
19 posted on
08/12/2006 12:23:55 PM PDT by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: sergey1973
The Muslims are free to be upset.
However if they would channel some of that energy to teach other Muslims how to express their anger without murdering thousands of innocent people... then perhaps there would be nothing to be upset about in the first place.
Hmmmmmm Muhammad?
20 posted on
08/12/2006 12:25:12 PM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: sergey1973
"Why are 'Moderate' Muslims not as angry at those who use Koran as justification for terror as they are angry at those who simply point at the connection between terror and the teachings of Islam?" I know it was a rhetorical question, but don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.
21 posted on
08/12/2006 12:26:29 PM PDT by
watchin
(Facts irritate liberals)
To: sergey1973
Fascists should be insulted to have their name coupled with islam.
22 posted on
08/12/2006 12:27:24 PM PDT by
RouxStir
(Refreshingly Offensive, with Hints of Cohiba and Auchentoshen.)
To: sergey1973
We don't need Muslims in this country.
23 posted on
08/12/2006 12:27:41 PM PDT by
Dallas59
(WHAT THE HELL ARE MUSLIMS DOING IN AMERICA???)
To: sergey1973
![](http://images.indymedia.org/imc/chiapas/20040405faluja_08tqbr.jpg)
Here are US soldiers in the country of "Peace lovers" of Islam!
How did G.Bush dare to call these angels islamofascists?
It's blasphemy!!! (sarcasm)
To: All
"It offends the vast majority of moderate Muslims," Ahmed Younis said.
YEAH IT OFFENDS BOTH OF THEM
"The use of the term casts a shadow upon Islam and bolsters the argument that there is a clash of civilisations between Islam and the West."
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE JIHAD, AHMED
He said it was wrong to link the actions of violent Muslims to their religion.
"There is nothing Islamic about their fascism. The Prophet [Muhammad] and the Koran clearly articulate that this type of activity is outside of bounds for Muslims."
UNLESS THE TARGETS ARE NON-MUSLIMS OR APOSTATES ... IT'S IN THE KORAN. QUIT LYING. WE'RE CATCHING ON.
25 posted on
08/12/2006 12:30:00 PM PDT by
inottawa
To: sergey1973
Yeah - IslamoCommies is the correct term for these fools.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson