Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day of terror strikes was planned for August 16
Daily Mail ^ | 8/11/2006

Posted on 08/11/2006 7:11:41 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-216 next last
To: Lucky9teen
I was thinking the same thing. And how do we know this isn't a diversion from what they really planned?

It would be silly to use something like this as a diversion as it actually heightens security everywhere.

181 posted on 08/11/2006 12:51:48 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Yes I know. But what I was saying is that she had it on purpose b/c the plan was to put some part of a liquid explosive in the baby's bottle to carry on a plane.


182 posted on 08/11/2006 12:54:08 PM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: sasha123
Does anybody know the cities that were targeted on 8/16?

From what has been released, there doesn't seem to any cities that were targeted. With this type of attack - an explosion to rip apart the plane - it would be very difficult to inflict any significant casualties on the ground.

183 posted on 08/11/2006 12:54:43 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Yes I know. But what I was saying is that she had it on purpose b/c the plan was to put some part of a liquid explosive in the baby's bottle to carry on a plane.

Yeah, I know what you're saying but my point is that would be totally in character with these islamists to not abort a baby because abortion is an abomination to Allah but then not hesitate to take it along on a suicide mission.

I really don't see how baby formula at that time would have been critical to their attack. If they needed to conceal a white looking liquid then they could just as easily have done it with an adult with milk.

Also, there was one baby put 10 planes were supposedly targeted.

184 posted on 08/11/2006 12:58:35 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Ok, Here you go from a British newspaper-

"It is believed that terrorists were planning to use liquid explosives to blow up the aeroplanes and as a result, airport security checks are forcing mothers to taste their bottles of baby milk before boarding."

Now this is my last reply, some people like to argue just to argue. I'm done playing.

185 posted on 08/11/2006 1:06:14 PM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

I'm glad right now, I and wife will be flying into National on the 16th.


186 posted on 08/11/2006 1:13:24 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Thank you for including the other Continental hubs. You are correct about the airports you mentioned as being international ports of departure/arrival for overseas flights. I didn't know they were also hubs for Continental.

This makes it somewhat easier to sort out what airports may have been the targets for 10 aircraft. How many times have documentaries on Al Quida (sp) mentioned how patient these people are in regard to planning and effecting their terror plans. Just when the world starts to get comfy with flying again....


187 posted on 08/11/2006 1:24:30 PM PDT by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Fairview
I do not know how security staff could deal with this.

Truthfully there is no way we can absolutely be sure that millions of passengers cannot slip some innocuous package onboard. It is inevitable.

What we should do is as the Israelis do; look for terrorists, not for weapons. Look for nervous, sweating, shifty people. They are about to die, they may be showing some stress. Look for empty eyes. Look for cash tickets bought in numbers. And yes, look for Muslims. Even the 'lily-white' converts. When in doubt, pull passengers aside and interview them. We should have El Al train the TSA.

188 posted on 08/11/2006 1:40:57 PM PDT by Sender (“Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

that was close!


189 posted on 08/11/2006 1:42:15 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Lawrence of Arabia born.
Abu Nidal died (some idspute on this). Maybe the date means nothing.


190 posted on 08/11/2006 1:48:27 PM PDT by PghBaldy (CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

I am beginning to lean towards TWA 800 as being the first successful attack of this type.


191 posted on 08/11/2006 2:01:36 PM PDT by Clink ("Government is not the solution, government is the problem".--Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seeker41

I don't see what you are arguing about. It's obvious that the woman didn't have the baby just as a terrorist device as one baby does no good when you are trying to down 10 planes.

And it's not clear what your quote from the British newspaper is supposed to prove. Mothers have been forced to taste baby formula and even bottled breast milk way before this incident.

So again, if they were trying to down 10 planes, how is one baby on one plane going to help?


192 posted on 08/11/2006 2:05:20 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Clink
I am beginning to lean towards TWA 800 as being the first successful attack of this type.

I've always thought that something more was a play on that flight but the thing that makes me doubt it is that no one has ever come forward to claim responsibility.

193 posted on 08/11/2006 2:06:49 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Yes and no. Who is to say they aren't trying to divert our attention to say, the skies (airlines), while they approach by land or sea?

Knowing people in the trucking industry, I've heard that area is a BIG target for terrorism and truck hijackings.


194 posted on 08/11/2006 2:09:44 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Ask not what the government can do for you. Ask why it doesn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

Thanks, - I should have been a little more clear. above which cities were they planning on blowing up planes. Just curious about general locations. I had heard some cities mentioned and even a diagram of where the planes were scheduled to go.

There wouldn't be loss of life from an explosion in the air (unless someone got hit by a large piece of debris), but I am sure it would scare the *^$% of everyone underneith, which is half their goal.

I feel like we are going through the post 9/11 days right now. When everyone was unsure of what was going to happen next.

As in Psalms 91:11: My prayer for all of you:

"For He will command his angels concerning you to guard you in all your ways."


195 posted on 08/11/2006 2:10:55 PM PDT by sasha123 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Expedited Airliner Boarding:

On right side, a "strict" aisle: here, boarders pass through multiple x-rays, MRI, barking dogs, lecherous old men wearing latex gloves, and lastly members of the NYFD in wife-beaters, holding heavy lead pipes...

On left side, an express aisle: 15-foot long, wall-to-wall, 3-inch deep depression in floor. Thousands of copies of the Koran fill this shallow walkway depression.

Same thing for customs, court-houses, and welfare offices. And DMV. And Wal-Mart

Budget negligible, no unreliable technology, immediately implementable, elevates "seperation of church and state" to unheard-of levels...

196 posted on 08/11/2006 2:16:02 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Thank you so much for the prayers, OldFriend.

(And thanks especially for the hug. :)

197 posted on 08/11/2006 3:04:54 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

All are Muslims, but not all are men; TWO ARE WOMEN.


198 posted on 08/11/2006 3:08:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
It could have been worse, the attack could have actually taken place.

One of my oldest and dearest friend's birthday is September 11th.

199 posted on 08/11/2006 3:13:17 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnite

Bizarre. Just bizarre.....


200 posted on 08/11/2006 3:32:47 PM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson