"It is believed that terrorists were planning to use liquid explosives to blow up the aeroplanes and as a result, airport security checks are forcing mothers to taste their bottles of baby milk before boarding."
Now this is my last reply, some people like to argue just to argue. I'm done playing.
I don't see what you are arguing about. It's obvious that the woman didn't have the baby just as a terrorist device as one baby does no good when you are trying to down 10 planes.
And it's not clear what your quote from the British newspaper is supposed to prove. Mothers have been forced to taste baby formula and even bottled breast milk way before this incident.
So again, if they were trying to down 10 planes, how is one baby on one plane going to help?