Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pitbull Journalist Goes Soft On Iranian Madman
Drudge Report ^ | 8-10-06 | DrudgeReport

Posted on 08/11/2006 3:58:23 AM PDT by nancyvideo

88-year-old CBS journalist Mike Wallace says Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a 'reasonable' man on Sean Hannity's ABC radio program... Points out Ahmadinejad not anti-Jewish... just anti-Zionist state. Says many Jews in Iranian Parliament, in great positions in Iranian life... Believes Ahmadinejad sincere in his hope for peaceful coexistence between Iran and West...

(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; cbsnews; iran; mediabias; mikewallace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2006 3:58:24 AM PDT by nancyvideo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

Allow me to point out the Wikipedia entry on Persian Jews.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Jews

Interesting to note is that they're only allotted one seat in their Parliament, and that discrimination and intimidation pretty much keeps them from doing much that might attract more negative attention than they do just by being alive.

"Jews in Iran are not allowed to communicate with Jewish groups outside of Iran unless the group is opposed to the existence of Israel..."

It is likely that until the mullahs are removed from power and the Persian Jews are allowed to express themselves candidly without fear of reprisals against themselves and their families, the real state of opinions among Persian Jews will remain unconfirmed. Wallace may have read a great deal of propaganda put out by the Iranian government and public statements made by Persian Jews under probable duress, and his internal bias has him inclined to believing that rather than noting that any community which is out numbered ten thousand to one, in a country noted for its religious fanaticism and arbitrarily unjust judicial system, is not going to vocally and publicly denounce their neighbors or call much attention to themselves.


2 posted on 08/11/2006 4:09:56 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

This got pulled by the mods yesterday. Wonder why?


3 posted on 08/11/2006 4:13:34 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

I heard Hannity's chat with Wallace yesterday. Wallace was babbling and incoherent for most of the time.


4 posted on 08/11/2006 4:17:22 AM PDT by LIConFem (Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MurryMom
RATS do enjoy their leftist dictators. Wallace with Ahmadinejad, Rather with Castro, Rather with Saddam, and of course anyone with Gorbachev.

I've heard lately that it's the dictator's power that RATS wish to emulate. Maybe it's time for the RATS to get some new friends...

5 posted on 08/11/2006 4:21:06 AM PDT by Libloather (I would give my left arm to be ambidextrous...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo
Unfortunately I lack the time to do it, but I'm sure that if someone were to compare Mike Wallace's comments about some other great leader like ... oh I don't know ... Castro, or Stalin, to his comments on this loon, the similarities would jump right off the page.

The guy is a mainstream journalist so by definition he's not all that smart, and profoundly lacking in creativity.
6 posted on 08/11/2006 4:28:43 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
Wallace was babbling and incoherent for most of the time.

Nothing new for the senile old fool.

Anyone that thinks that idiot has anything worthwhile to contribute to the world of journalism is seriously deluded.

And anyone that submits to an interview by him is similiarly deluded, although in the case of AshcanIbinbad, he started off in a state of delusion.

A pox on the lot of them.

7 posted on 08/11/2006 5:02:09 AM PDT by OldSmaj (As a sworn enemy of islam, I desecrate the koran on a daily basis in the privacy of my own toilet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

Wikipedia is the last source for any reference on FR. As a matter of fact, it should be ignored.


8 posted on 08/11/2006 5:05:06 AM PDT by toddlintown (IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo

He thinks the Madman is sincere, but he still thinks Bush is dishonest.


9 posted on 08/11/2006 5:05:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

I don't think he was incoherent. Just shockingly naive.



The guys at cBS who think Bush should be impeached over TANG place an awful lot of blind confidence in Ahmadinejad's bona fides.


10 posted on 08/11/2006 5:07:58 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

They are smart enough not to conduct their own Jewish holocaust in Iran at this time, even though they would dearly love to do so. They know that such an action on their part would PO even the Europeans.


So they'll wait until they have the a-bomb before doing so.


11 posted on 08/11/2006 5:10:18 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Why was Mike Wallace picked for this interview?Does it have anything to do with his son working on Fox?


12 posted on 08/11/2006 5:17:01 AM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
Wikipedia is the last source for any reference on FR. As a matter of fact, it should be ignored.

That's not true. Wikipedia is a useful reference, as long as it is kept in mind that it isn't an authoritative reference. Unless you're inclined to spend a month in a university library doing the necessary research to get a good grip on Persian Jews, Wikipedia's entry is sufficient for getting a grip on what is currently known.

Besides, it isn't that hard to read past the bias. The wikipedia entry I referenced was clearly carefully edited, but a few telling lines and facts emerge from it to indicate that Persian Jews are not "equal" citizens in Iran, and that they are carefully monitored. If not for their wealth and ability to generate wealth - they probably not have been tolerated to the degree that they have been. It is the same story from the time of the Ottomans, when Jews were tolerated for their industry and honesty in business, as well as for their inability to defend themselves against their neighbors if they should happen to piss them off.

With Wikipedia, it is trust and verify, and read carefully for bias - but it is also a quick reference for information. It doesn't take much to verify questionable statistics and facts in wikipedia entries, but even bad entries are good starting points for investigating a topic. At the least an entry will yield up names, dates, and other hard facts that can be used to hunt down details.

13 posted on 08/11/2006 5:17:37 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nancyvideo
That's like saying Hitler didn't mean what he said about the Jews. They are protected in Germany, Hitler dreams only of peace and dialogue with the West. Yeah, we've heard that garbage before.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

14 posted on 08/11/2006 5:19:33 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
Chris Wallace said of his father (maybe after the meatloaf scuffle) "The man has lost it", on the Howie Carr Show.

(Howie plays the sound clip fairly often)

15 posted on 08/11/2006 5:19:34 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ardara

No. The Madman picked him because Wallace did an interview many years ago with Komeini, and they liked the way Wallace did it then.


16 posted on 08/11/2006 5:21:14 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
They are smart enough not to conduct their own Jewish holocaust in Iran at this time, even though they would dearly love to do so. They know that such an action on their part would PO even the Europeans.

It wouldn't take much. There are probably less than 50,000 Jews in Iran, and all of them are probably registered somewhere. All it would take is a few nights with a few provocateurs with lists of names and addresses embedded in some mobs and the Jews would probably be wiped out.

I'm sure the Jews know this, and they must live their lives in perpetual fear of an outbreak of riots and violence. In many ways, the Jews in Iran are probably hostages to Israel's being careful when it comes to relations with Syria and Iran.

17 posted on 08/11/2006 5:22:09 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I've heard lately that it's the dictator's power that RATS wish to emulate.

Exactly. They admire anti-American dictators because that's what they most want to be.

18 posted on 08/11/2006 5:22:22 AM PDT by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

A sign, to this ol' boy, that I'mafoolajihad has a demonic mantle ... Wallace wouldn't have recognized the demonspirit if it had reached out and slap him. We are seeing the live expression of demonic spirit and won't even acknowledge it!


19 posted on 08/11/2006 5:27:51 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
Wiki is garbage, the primary source for lazy researchers. I'd be embarrassed to mention it as my source for a posting.
20 posted on 08/11/2006 5:28:45 AM PDT by toddlintown (IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson