Massachusetts State Police patrol with automatic weapons at Logan International Airport in Boston, Thursday, August 10.
1 posted on
08/10/2006 6:50:04 PM PDT by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: jdm
As sure as there's a God in Heaven, they got it from a
WIRETAP
Talk about a slap in the face to the liberals!
2 posted on
08/10/2006 6:51:20 PM PDT by
Howlin
(Pres.Bush ought to be ashamed of himself for allowing foreign countries right on our borders!!~~Zook)
To: jdm
Interesting update. Thank God for Brit Intel that is all I can say.
3 posted on
08/10/2006 6:53:13 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(Thank God the Brits don't have a New York Times!)
To: jdm
Notice how they very carefully did NOT mention NSA wire-taps? Don't Democrats to have it "explode in their faces", so to speak........
To: jdm
Are all pilots armed now? If there is an unarmed pilot shouldn't we know what plane he/she is flying so we can stay home?
8 posted on
08/10/2006 6:58:42 PM PDT by
groanup
(Anti fair taxers are profiting from the IRS. How can they sleep?)
To: jdm
"Allen stressed that the plans seemed designed to kill passengers, not crash into a city on the ground. "We have no evidence there was targeting of cities," said Allen, "This was an effort to destroy multiple aircraft in flight not against any territory of the United States."
This I don't believe. A terrorist wants to kill as many people as possible - just as they did on 9/11. There is NO WAY in this world you can convince me that terrorist ONLY WANTED TO KILL THE PEOPLE ON THE PLANE in the MIDDLE OF THE OCEAN. Come on!
Of course cities were targeted. They want the most death for their plans and blowing up in the middle of the ocean would not accomplish that.
9 posted on
08/10/2006 6:59:36 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: jdm
You mean intercepting communications and covert surveillance of terrosts actually works? Whoda thunk it.
To: jdm
But what about my OINTMENT?
13 posted on
08/10/2006 7:01:22 PM PDT by
JOE6PAK
(FAKE, but ACCURATE!)
To: jdm
This is the sort of thing the New York Times attempted to stop happening.
It's pretty clear they're working for the enemy now.
14 posted on
08/10/2006 7:01:38 PM PDT by
muawiyah
(-/sarcasm)
To: jdm
Just watching FOX news right now ... news flash ... announcing that an undercover British agent infiltrated a UK terrorist group that foiled the plan. WHY oh WHY announce THIS? Now that agent will be useless. Guess the ratings will compensate for that. Geesh! How stupid. Some things should NOT be reported.
15 posted on
08/10/2006 7:01:59 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: zot; The Shrew
Lots of new informaton here.
Too much, perhaps...
To: jdm
Great post, jdm. Thank you!
23 posted on
08/10/2006 7:08:02 PM PDT by
Chena
(I'm not young enough to know everything.)
To: jdm
Maybe they should also consider retaliatory plans to let the muzzies know that this time they wont get out clean...
27 posted on
08/10/2006 7:11:24 PM PDT by
ChristianDefender
(Never Give Your Enemy (ROP) A Foothold.)
To: jdm
"An alert the FBI and DHS sent out Thursday to state and local law enforcement agencies which is classified "For Official Use Only" and was obtained by TIME warns them that the peroxide-based explosives could also be employed in future attacks here." Someone should have their azz handed to them for giving official security documents to the Times. Yeah, like that's gonna happen.
40 posted on
08/10/2006 7:22:27 PM PDT by
lonevoice
(Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
To: jdm
" U.S. officials believe the 29 members were divided into multiple cells and planned to break into small groups to board the nine planes."
Do the math...9 planes.
Are 26 suspects enough to pull this off?
43 posted on
08/10/2006 7:25:23 PM PDT by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
To: NerdDad
Bump to pass on in the morning.
46 posted on
08/10/2006 7:33:10 PM PDT by
NerdDad
(Aug 7, 1981, I married my soulmate, CDBEAR. 25 years and I'm still teenager-crazy in love with her.)
To: jdm
49 posted on
08/10/2006 7:36:03 PM PDT by
VOA
To: jdm
"An alert the FBI and DHS sent out Thursday to state and local law enforcement agencies which is classified "For Official Use Only" and was obtained by TIME"
How was it obtained by Time ?
50 posted on
08/10/2006 7:38:25 PM PDT by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
To: jdm
An alert the FBI and DHS sent out Thursday to state and local law enforcement agencies which is classified "For Official Use Only" and was obtained by TIMESo, TIME is now "Official"?
56 posted on
08/10/2006 7:44:26 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: jdm
I'd like an opinion from someone who is an expert here on whether or not the volume of the explosive in the bottles could have taken out a passenger plane from a pack in the overhead compartment. experts only reply pls or ridicule i'm up for both.
To: jdm
The plot also appears to be a return to older terrorist tactics of trying to blow up an airplane in mid air, rather than turn the jet into a missile as the Sept. 11 attackers did. Allen stressed that the plans seemed designed to kill passengers, not crash into a city on the ground. "We have no evidence there was targeting of cities," said Allen, "This was an effort to destroy multiple aircraft in flight not against any territory of the United States." Blow those planes up over any urban area and thousands more would perish!
70 posted on
08/10/2006 8:33:08 PM PDT by
demsux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson