Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thwarting the Airline Plot: Inside the Investigation (USA picked up chatter and shared) ... TIME MAG
Time Magazine ^ | August 10, 2006 | BRIAN BENNETT AND DOUGLAS WALLER

Posted on 08/10/2006 6:50:03 PM PDT by jdm

Wednesday night was a long and troubling one for Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. A bubbling plot by British citizens to blow up airplanes had come to a boil in the past three days, and as British authorities arrested dozens of suspects around London, it was Chertoff's job to coordinate the U.S. defenses. Scary intelligence reports pop up all the time, but this particular terror operation got close enough to being carried out that it rattled even the normally sedate Chertoff. "Very seldom do things get to me," he told Rep. Peter King, the Republican chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, in a phone call late Wednesday night. "This one has really gotten to me."

Chertoff had good reason to be worried. Senior U.S officials have confirmed to TIME details of the plot that led the secretary to ratchet up the color-coded security alert for British-U.S. flights to an unprecedented red for "Severe." A total of 24 individuals were arrested in Britain overnight and, says one senior U.S. official who was briefed on the plot, five still remain at large. Their plan was to smuggle the peroxide-based liquid explosive TATP and detonators onto nine different planes from four carriers — British Airways, Continental, United and American — that fly direct routes between the U.K and the U.S. and blow them up mid-air. Intelligence officials estimate that about 2,700 people would have perished, according to the official.

Britain's MI-5 intelligence service and Scotland Yard had been tracking the plot for several months, but only in the past two weeks had the plotters' planning begun to crystallize, senior U.S. officials tell TIME. In the two or three days before the arrests, the cell was going operational, and authorities were pressed into action. MI5 and Scotland Yard agents tracked the plotters from the ground, while a knowledgeable American official says U.S. intelligence provided London authorities with intercepts of the group's communications. Most of the suspects are second or third generation British citizens of Pakistani descent whose families hailed from war-torn Kashmir. U.S. officials believe the 29 members were divided into multiple cells and planned to break into small groups to board the nine planes.

"During the past few months the plotters' attack plans had changed," said Deputy Secretary for Homeland Security Michael Jackson. "There were different data sets about their interests over time that evolved," he said. It was only in recent days, said Jackson, that the plans began to focus on British-U.S. flights. The plot was "very near execution" but not imminent, Jackson said. "We didn't pull people off of airplanes."

So as not to derail the British round-up, Chertoff had to wait until the early hours of Thursday morning after all the London arrests were made before notifying U.S. airports of the threat, say senior DHS officals. When it became clear the arrests would be wrapped up around 1 a.m Washington time, Chertoff got on a conference call with his Homeland Security Advisory Committee to approve changing the threat level. Then calls when out to the airlines, airline security companies and labor unions affected by the changes, as well as to members of Congress.

Though the plot has all the hallmarks of an al Qaeda operation, U.S. officials cautioned that there isn't yet evidence of a direct link between the plotters and the organization's top leaders. "We're not convinced this particular operation is connected to the al Qaeda chain of command," Charles Allen, Chief of Intelligence for the Department of Homeland Security, told reporters on Thursday afternoon. As for whether the attack was being timed for the fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, Allen said he thought the attack would simply be launched when it was ready. "I am a long standing believer that terrorist plotters or planners execute when they have all of the plot together," said Allen. "We have no evidence this was timed to any particular holiday or special event."

The plot also appears to be a return to older terrorist tactics of trying to blow up an airplane in mid air, rather than turn the jet into a missile as the Sept. 11 attackers did. Allen stressed that the plans seemed designed to kill passengers, not crash into a city on the ground. "We have no evidence there was targeting of cities," said Allen, "This was an effort to destroy multiple aircraft in flight — not against any territory of the United States."

With five members of the cell believed to be at large, the threat still looms and intelligence officials are still working to unravel the full extent of the plot. "I don't believe we know all the dimensions of this plot. Time has to pass to determine that a network was disrupted," said Allen. Worries another U.S. official: "Plan A has been stopped, but the concern: Is there a Plan B?"

The possibility that liquid explosives could be smuggled onto a plane is not a surprise to counterterrorism experts, and the tightening of U.S. airport security could only be temporary as security officials learn more about the extent of the plot and how to defend against such an attack. The current measures — stripping passengers of anything liquid in their carry-on luggage — were in reaction to these particular arrests, and not to the realization of a new, unforeseen threat. "We're primarily concerned about this particular plot," said Allen, implying that the new security measures are not permanent.

FBI and Department of Homeland Security officials quickly alerted law enforcement agencies around the country to the peroxide-based liquid explosives the London plotters planned to bring aboard the American-bound planes. An alert the FBI and DHS sent out Thursday to state and local law enforcement agencies — which is classified "For Official Use Only" and was obtained by TIME — warns them that the peroxide-based explosives could also be employed in future attacks here.

The Joint Homeland Special Assessment, which the FBI and DHS's Office of Intelligence Analysis drafted and sent out, is titled "Possible Terrorist Use of Liquid Explosive Materials in Future Attacks." The document states: "The FBI and DHS have no information of plotting within the United States, but such a possibility cannot be discounted." The FBI-DHS report notes that Osama bin Laden's top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri insisted in a July 27 videotape that Al Qaeda was still intent on conducting another "spectacular" attack in the United States. Zawahiri, the report notes, used photos of the World Trade Center burning on Sept. 11 and 9/11 leader Muhammad Atta "in the background of this video."

The FBI-DHS report next warns law enforcement agencies about the two peroxide-based liquid explosive that could be used in a future attack against the U.S.--triacetone triperoxide (TATP) or hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD). The report describes how a terrorist would assemble bombs with these chemicals. Peroxide-based liquid explosives "are sensitive to heat, shock, and friction, can be initiated simply with fire or electrical charge, and can also be used to produce improvised detonators," the report states. "For example, TATP or HMTD may be placed in a tube or syringe body in contact with a bare bulb filament, such as that obtained from inside a Christmas tree light bulb, to produce an explosion." The report doesn't mention anything about a terrorist assembling such a bomb on a plane, but it does warn that manufacturing such a device can be dangerous for the bombmaker. "Because of the instability of these substances," the report notes, "spontaneous detonation can occur during the production process."

Over the past ten years peroxide-based explosives have popped up in a number of terror operations, according to FBI-DHS report. "Terrorist have used peroxide-based explosive both as a main charge (weighing in excess of 20 pounds) and improvised detonators," the joint assessment states. "TATP was popularized as a main charge explosive in suicide bombs used by Palestinian terrorist groups."

Ramzi Yousef, who was convicted in 1996 for plotting to simultaneously bomb up to a dozen U.S. commercial airliners flying in the Far East, had manufactured TATP detonators. Arrested Dec. 14, 1999, for planning to attack Los Angeles International Airport in the millennium bombing plot, Ahmed Ressam had HMTD and RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitrame) in a vial in the trunk of his car. He also had over 100 pounds of urea sulfate white powder and eight ounces of nitroglycerine mixture.

More recently, British shoe bomber Richard Reid tried to detonate his device with TATP as the initiator while aboard a Dec. 22, 2001, American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami. A mixture of TATP and ammonium nitrate was used in suicide bombs in Casablanca, Moroco on May 16, 2003. And the FBI-DHS report notes that four of the suicide bombers in the London subway attack July 7, 2005 "used peroxide-based explosive devices (IEDs), concealed inside rucksacks." With such a rich history, liquid explosives are sure to challenge America's counter-terror defenses for many years to come.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gwot; londonairlineplot; timemag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: b4its2late

Saw on Fox News earlier today that one of GWB's greatest concerns was that it would all be leaked before the arrests.


81 posted on 08/10/2006 9:11:13 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Most of the suspects are second or third generation British citizens of Pakistani descent

Our diversity is our death wish.

82 posted on 08/10/2006 9:15:18 PM PDT by TEEHEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I read that they wanted to explode the planes at the same time. That would lead me to believe they were going to do it over the ocean as it would be difficult to find 9 (or 10 or whatever) planes leaving from the UK and landing in the US at the same time. A couple of more points...Passengers would be required to be seated and belted in when approaching the US city, which would have required the explosive to be mixed earlier and stored somewhere so it could be detonated at the last moment. Waiting would increase the chances of it being found. And, last, the planes would be at a lower altitude as they got over the city they were to land in...so the pressure would be less...and the chance of the plane surviving a small explosion would be greater.

Now I don't know what was going on in the mind of the terrorists, but I think there are some good reasons that they might have exploded them over the ocean.
83 posted on 08/10/2006 9:18:03 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: nmh

On the other hand, if a plane falls in mid-Atlantic deep waters it would be hard to prove just what actually brought it down, adds to FUD factor (fear, uncertainty and dread) for future flyers let alone prosecute any others involved but AQ etc can still claim the credit. Think of the Air India 747 that blew up over the Pacific, not sure they ever got a conviction of the support staff in Canada. Lockerbie was almost certainly supposed to blow up over water.


84 posted on 08/10/2006 9:22:12 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nmh

"These cities are meaningful to them; not an ocean." Reminds me of Ghenghis Khan who considered cities a violation of gods plan that the world be one big pasture for horses.


85 posted on 08/10/2006 9:24:08 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I disagree. It's just a matter of opinion. Planes exploding above cities would be worse. More death. Not just people on the plane. They LOVE murdering innocent people.

Not really more death on the ground. A plan crashed in NYC after 9/11 and I don't believe there hardly any deaths on the ground at all.

86 posted on 08/10/2006 9:28:12 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Zawahiri, the report notes, used photos of the World Trade Center burning on Sept. 11 and 9/11 leader Muhammad Atta "in the background of this video."

I guess Zawahiri doesn't believe that 9/11 was an "inside job" the way most Democrats seem to.

87 posted on 08/10/2006 9:38:29 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Perhaps the infiltrator that they had in their midst misunderstood their intentions...


88 posted on 08/10/2006 9:42:14 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jdm

I have a friend who works for Scotland Yard. I sent him a note of thanks today.


89 posted on 08/10/2006 9:48:38 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

Little Tommy Daschle is sad, and so is Harry Reid!


90 posted on 08/10/2006 9:53:13 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Arrested Dec. 14, 1999, for planning to attack Los Angeles International Airport in the millennium bombing plot, Ahmed Ressam had HMTD and RDX (cyclotrimethylene trinitrame) in a vial in the trunk of his car.

RDX is a military explosive.

WTF did he get *that*...!!!!!?

"Lone disgruntled person" my ASS!

91 posted on 08/11/2006 12:26:22 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Deliberate, probably fake, leak.

Trying to get the cell to take out a few more of its real members in their suspicions--and if we're lucky generate new chatter for the NSA in doing so.

Cheers!

92 posted on 08/11/2006 12:28:55 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I disagree. It's just a matter of opinion. Planes exploding above cities would be worse. More death. Not just people on the plane. They LOVE murdering innocent people

By the time of arrival there wouldn't be much fuel left on board; the explosive would be limited pretty much to just what was in the bottles. A plane coming apart over a US city wouldn't appreciably add to the death toll unless it just happened to plunge into a stadium full of baseball fans, and this is unlikely given variables such as timing and the terrorists not having control of the cockpit.

Taking down 9 planes or so and all the passengers and crew would be spectacular enough for terrorist tastes. The side benefit of not giving the US another "ground zero" to rally around- just a generic wet spot in the Atlantic- is enough for their tastes- they know the long drawn-out recovery process of workers after the 9/11 attacks riled America up instead of making us quiver in fear as they had hoped. [Note that recently Palestinian propagandists were quick to stage their own "ground zero flag photo op" in Qana in the Lebanon conflict, and so on.] The economic impact on us again, is enough for their tastes. Perhaps they could in the hopes of further dividing us, exploit conspiracy theorists, sowing rumors that the aircraft were taken down by the US Navy, etc.

On the other hand, the terrorists would miss out on powerful imagery for recruitment since there was not likely to be any photographers in the mid Atlantic to take dramatic photos of their dirty deeds.

93 posted on 08/11/2006 12:59:52 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

There is one other thing they don't mention, that this murderous zealots are (shhhh) Muslim.


94 posted on 08/11/2006 5:00:52 AM PDT by RightCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightCanuck
"that this murderous zealots are (shhhh) Muslim."

Ahhhhhhhhh.........

You said the "M" word...

Oh, the humanity !

95 posted on 08/11/2006 5:08:18 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nmh
"I'd like to believe that passengers could be depended on to take back the plane "

Only if they're not a plane-load of Democrats!

96 posted on 08/11/2006 5:09:58 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Reuters' photoshop dept was on high alert! ;>)

since there was not likely to be any photographers in the mid Atlantic to take dramatic photos of their dirty deeds.

97 posted on 08/11/2006 5:20:10 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Thanks for this important article.


98 posted on 08/11/2006 6:58:17 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I was thinking the same thing, WIRETAPS. But the article glosses over the fact that the British authorities had been investigating the plot for months without notifying the CIA, for fear of a leak.


99 posted on 08/11/2006 8:38:28 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nmh

I heard that they wanted to blow up the planes over U.S. population centers and have the fiery debris rain down on the cities.


100 posted on 08/11/2006 10:39:41 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson