Skip to comments.
Heads Up! Michael Chertoff on O'Reilly Factor NOW!
Fox News
| 8/10/2006
| staff
Posted on 08/10/2006 5:06:30 PM PDT by kellynla
Michael Chertoff on NOW!
TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; chertoff; dhs; foxnews; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Reagan Man
I had hoped Franks retired so he could enter political realm. Maybe he will.
21
posted on
08/10/2006 5:30:29 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: NormsRevenge
>OK, Ollie
North then.;-) <
Now there's an idea!
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Half the nation would be on the floor grabbing their sides!
23
posted on
08/10/2006 5:34:57 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: kellynla
Fox's Greg Burke is Pro Hezbo
24
posted on
08/10/2006 5:36:03 PM PDT
by
Rosemont
To: South40
I had hoped Franks retired so he could enter political realm. Maybe he will. Why would Franks run? If he's pro-choice, or isn't "kick 'em all out" on immigration, you vultures would crucify him, no matter what his stance on terrorism was.
At least, that's what you're doing to Rudy.
25
posted on
08/10/2006 5:45:50 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: DTogo
“If we use a term from Soviet doctrine, it is:
Inside the decision cycle.
Our forces were actually inside the ability of the enemy to react.
The Iraqi forces were 48 to 72 hours behind our ability to see what they were doing.”
--General Tommy Franks 
26
posted on
08/10/2006 5:56:44 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: kellynla
Actually, all I read and hear is that Chertoff was a very good conservative judge.
He is not considered by many (ie. Freepers) to be a good administrator.
His management ability is surely in question.
27
posted on
08/10/2006 6:05:43 PM PDT
by
Prost1
((We can build a wall, we can evict - "Si, se puede!"))
To: sinkspur
Why would Franks run? If he's pro-choice, or isn't "kick 'em all out" on immigration, you vultures would crucify him, no matter what his stance on terrorism was. At least, that's what you're doing to RudyDo you normally put your foot in your mouth or did you make an exception for this time?
I would not crucify Rudy. I met the man when he was in stumping in San Diego for Bill Simon. I chose to go to that rally just to see him.
I can only assume you have mistaken me for someone else. Whatever the case, you are wrong.
28
posted on
08/10/2006 6:18:02 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: South40
I'm sorry if I misidentified you.
But this forum is filled to overflowing with people who don't see the WOT as the number one issue, and would rather focus on gay marriage, or abortion, or guns or something else.
They won't support Rudy because of his stance on those issues, and they'd dump Tommy Franks if he didn't toe the true conservative line, too.
29
posted on
08/10/2006 6:27:33 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
To: sinkspur
I know the type but I am not one.
The point of my last post was you should know who you are addressing before you do.
30
posted on
08/10/2006 6:33:54 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: sinkspur
31
posted on
08/11/2006 1:44:20 PM PDT
by
mthom
To: mthom
32
posted on
08/11/2006 2:13:42 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Today, we settled all family business.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson