Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voter Suppression in Missouri (or fraud?)
New York Times ^ | 8/10/06

Posted on 08/10/2006 4:55:14 PM PDT by seutonius1234

Missouri is the latest front in the Republican Party’s campaign to use photo ID requirements to suppress voting. The Republican legislators who pushed through Missouri’s ID law earlier this year said they wanted to deter fraud, but that claim falls apart on close inspection. Missouri’s new ID rules — and similar ones adopted last year in Indiana and Georgia — are intended to deter voting by blacks, poor people and other groups that are less likely to have driver’s licenses. Georgia’s law has been blocked by the courts, and the others should be too.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: elections; missouri; photoid; polls; votefraud; voterid; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: seutonius1234

They'd whine about the purple inked fingers to limit votes to one to a customer, too!


21 posted on 08/10/2006 5:12:48 PM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coldoc
"As an aside, how does this new law work with Absentee Ballots? Do you send in a copy of the ID along with the ballot??"



Hello,

That I do not know, perhaps another MO Freeper knows the answer.

Glad to be here, MOgirl
22 posted on 08/10/2006 5:14:53 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MOgirl

And the only time liberals scream voter fraud is when THEY lose.. and then they can't prove anything because it's a crock.... They are STUNNED when they lose because they can't believe THEIR fraud didn't swing the votes!


23 posted on 08/10/2006 5:15:19 PM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts ("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: coldoc
As an aside, how does this new law work with Absentee Ballots? Do you send in a copy of the ID along with the ballot??

How about a spot for a fingerprint, and a little ink patch? What a rights violation THAT would be! < /sarc >

24 posted on 08/10/2006 5:17:25 PM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: divine_moment_of_facts
Hello,

My favorite thing about the screams from the Left when they lose, is that they always point to areas controlled by them.

St. Louis City would be a prime example. Oh, the wailing, the disenfranchised, the agony.

Idiots. The Dems CONTROL St. Louis City. How I hate their lies.....

Glad to be here, MOgirl
25 posted on 08/10/2006 5:19:53 PM PDT by MOgirl (Democrats: The Culture of Treason (and you know what I'm talkin about!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

What a bunch of bullship. How can anyone not despise the Slimes when that is the crud they put out?
:(


26 posted on 08/10/2006 5:21:22 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

No ID -

Can't cash a check
Can't buy smokes
Can't buy a drink
Can't get on a plane

Hello. How is there a rational argument that these ID requirements regarding racial inequality.


27 posted on 08/10/2006 5:21:27 PM PDT by rwilson99 (R) South Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

Voter eligibility in Missouri bump! Great news!


28 posted on 08/10/2006 5:28:45 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

More than a century of Demo fraud in St. Louis is about to come to an end. A new era.

Bill Clay....check up on your retirement account.


29 posted on 08/10/2006 5:30:25 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (This space for hire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MOgirl
Well, if it means anything, I would ask you for your ID.
30 posted on 08/10/2006 5:31:23 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
One very interesting thing about the Mexican Election held in Mexico a few weeks ago:

ALL MEXICAN VOTERS HAD TO HAVE A VALID GOVERNMENT APPROVED ID TO VOTE - EVEN POOR PEOPLE (and there are a lot of poor people in Mexico).

WHAT A GREAT FACT TO HAVE AT MY FINGERTIPS!!!

31 posted on 08/10/2006 5:33:03 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

The idea that any yankee writing in the NYT should have an opinion worth more'n a rat's a$% about what the Great State of Missouri will do to insure the validity of its citizen's ballots in unfreaking beleivable!!!!


32 posted on 08/10/2006 5:33:28 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234; All

IS THE NYT ON CRACK?!!

Why do they constantly ignore the states that have had photo ID requirements FOR DECADES?!!!


Look at Hanging Chad FLORIDA where NOBODY complained about the photo ID requirement.

DOES ANYONE HAVE A MAP WHICH SHOWS A STATE BY STATE BREAKDOWN?


33 posted on 08/10/2006 5:35:49 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

I would allow a liberal hardship exemption for picture ID's, that way there will be no excuse for it.

It's worth the cost.


34 posted on 08/10/2006 5:35:57 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

That is, a hardship exemption for the processing fee of picture ID's


35 posted on 08/10/2006 5:37:16 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

Hi guys, Even though I am living in China I am from Missouri. A few years ago I had to move two or three times in about 2 years. Dont ask why its a long story. This coupled with some district changes in my area caused me to have to try and find out where I was supposed to vote. I went to my usual voting location to find out where my new location was. To my suprise I was on the voting role there. I thought this was strange and continued to track down my voting location. I went to two other places. Both places I was on the log. Well I was friends with the Republican representative at the County Election Board. So I called her up. She said yes this was a mistake and told me the proper place to go. After I put in my legal vote I decided to test things. I went back to the other two locations and ask for a ballot. I was provided with one in each location. While the temptation was great to vote three time I didnt.

4 years before this I had lived in Kansas, just across the river. So I decided to check my old voting location there. YEP, you guessed it. I was still on the log there and could have voted. SO in the presidential election I could have cast 4 votes.


36 posted on 08/10/2006 5:40:52 PM PDT by KungFuBrad (American In China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

The poor in the inner cities have a high motivation to vote, thus getting a free state ID card is not a significant impediment to casting a vote.

Maybe voter turnout will decrease from 110% to 105?


37 posted on 08/10/2006 5:43:16 PM PDT by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seutonius1234

If one wants to vote badly enough; go to the proper agency and get a driver license or a State picture I.D.

DUH!!!


38 posted on 08/10/2006 5:46:12 PM PDT by no dems (www.4condi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Spot on.


39 posted on 08/10/2006 5:47:44 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Thinking back on it; it might be a good idea to bring back the $2 Poll Tax of the '40s and '50s (Adjusted for inflation of course.) At least you'd get only people who value their right to vote and our Constitutional Republic and who are informed and politically astute.

You'd have two years to save the $10 or so.

Wow! Can't wait to see how much wrath this comment generates.


40 posted on 08/10/2006 5:51:21 PM PDT by no dems (www.4condi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson