Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ceasefire in Works (NO IDF INVASION, NO DISARMING OF HEZBOLLAH)
Ynet ^ | 08/10/06 | Ilan Marciano

Posted on 08/10/2006 11:27:49 AM PDT by mojito

US, French diplomats working on new formula that would lead to ceasefire in North; new proposal may be submitted to UN by Friday; sources say agreement based on French military deployment on northern border. Senior Israeli official: Revised UN Resolution will stop short of requiring peacekeepers to disarm Hizbullah

Getting close to ceasefire? While the IDF is preparing to expand military operations, a French-American proposal for a cease-fire is being formulated Thursday evening and may be presented to the United Nations Security Council by Friday.

According to various reports, the agreement is based on the deployment of French troops on the northern border along with UNIFIL and Lebanese army forces. UN officials expressed optimism regarding the plan but are still waiting for approval from Jerusalem and Beirut.

According to sources in Jerusalem, the new formula is premised on four components:

1. The deployment of a genuine military forces, apparently French and German, in southern Lebanon 2. The implementation of Resolution 1559 3. Negotiations on a prisoner swap 4. The establishment of a mechanism for future Israeli-Lebanese dealings

French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said that an agreement on a Security Council proposal for an end to the fighting in Lebanon will be worked out shortly. According to the French minister, "things started moving in New York."

The American-French draft resolution has been forwarded to both Israel and Lebanon for approval. Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Gillerman said the new proposal envisions the IDF staying in Lebanon until it is replaced by a multinational force. Israel hopes such force would have a mandate to deploy across the region and prevent the transfer of weapons from Iran and Syria.

The proposal being formulated followed a meeting Thursday morning between the American and French UN ambassadors, and still needs to be approved by Britain, Russia and China before being presented to the Security Council. American officials again stressed the need to avoid a gap between words and deeds on the ground, in order to avoid a return to the reality that prevailed before July 12.

'This decision is difficult'

According to various reports, the multinational forces being designed for this end includes Lebanese troops, UNIFIL forces, and several thousand French soldiers who are already in the region and can be deployed quickly, at least temporarily, until a more efficient and powerful international force is created. French soldiers are slated to play a major role in such force as well.

According to estimates, Hizbullah will be interested in a ceasefire and will end its rocket fire once a truce is declared, while continuing to fight against IDF forces in Lebanon.

A senior Israeli official said the revised UN Resolution will stop short of requiring peacekeepers to disarm Hizbullah but will call for an embargo to prevent the group from bringing in arms from Iran and Syria.

Kadima Knesset Member Otniel Otniel Schneller met with Prime Minister Ehuld Olmert, who told him that "at this time, a new diplomatic formula with positive implications that could end the fighting is being formulated. If it isn't accepted, Israel will take off the gloves."

Schneller said that he left the meeting with a good feeling and was impressed that the prime minister is decisive.

"At this time there's an attempt to produce a new diplomatic draft, and if what I saw will indeed materialize it would be fabulous. It would prevent Israeli victims," he said.

Schneller added that during the meeting, Olmert received a letter from one of the families who lost their loved ones in Lebanon.

"The letter only strengthened the prime minister, but I also saw dampness in his eyes – this is in fact the dilemma, bringing about a diplomatic agreement or continuing the battle. This decision is difficult both rationally and emotionally," Schneller concluded.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chamberlain; daralislam; dhimmis; enablers; francesurrenders; fwance; globaljihad; islamicnazis; islamofascism; islamonaziism; quislings; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
This is a disgrace. When I posted an article a few days ago highly critical of using the UN to negotiate an end to this conflict, I was much criticized. Now all the chickens have come home to roost. Hezbollah has won, thanks to Jacques Chirac, and Sec. Rice. The Resolution will call for the disarming of Hezbollah, although no one will be actually entrusted with the task of disarming Hezbollah, and certainly not the French.
1 posted on 08/10/2006 11:27:50 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojito

Pysop.
I hope anyway.


2 posted on 08/10/2006 11:30:22 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Who will the French surrender to first? The Israelis or Hezbollah? Or maybe they'll just go ahead and surrender to the Germans. They've had lots of experience with that.


3 posted on 08/10/2006 11:30:28 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

You are absolutely right. The French acting as a military buffer? Get real. What did the French run out of rape opportunities in the Congo? The French troops will do nothing to stop Hezbollah attacks on Israel nor to disarm them. Iran won. Good job Condi.


4 posted on 08/10/2006 11:30:58 AM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

The international force was never meant to disarm Hizballah not in this resolution and not in the previous one that failed. I do not know what exactly changed from the previous resolution rejected by Lebanon and Hizballah and this second resolution, they look very similar.


5 posted on 08/10/2006 11:32:48 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
I cannot believe Israel would go along with this. This is absolute suicide for the Jewish state. This is tantamount to defeat. Israel cannot afford a single defeat or they are done for.
6 posted on 08/10/2006 11:32:56 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal

the IDF already said it would take a couple days to logistically prepare the hammer to strike. this is likely just a coverage to them. psy-ops somebody else posted. yep.


7 posted on 08/10/2006 11:35:06 AM PDT by APRPEH (visit my profile page to donate to Israeli charities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mojito

If true, this is bad. Hezbollah must be destroyed, and a better opportunity wil not come.


8 posted on 08/10/2006 11:35:54 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
...genuine military forces, apparently French and German,...

Genuine French military forces? Did Napolean come back from the grave?..........

9 posted on 08/10/2006 11:36:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Hez-Ebola will be called the victor and they will soon rule Lebanon with an iron fist


10 posted on 08/10/2006 11:37:11 AM PDT by GeronL (http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If true, we deserve the fate that Islam brings.


11 posted on 08/10/2006 11:37:56 AM PDT by samadams2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mojito

That's my take as well, but remember that Rice is not implementing her agenda. And when you realize what that means, it really sucks!


12 posted on 08/10/2006 11:40:01 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

The Israeli leadership is getting soft. If they buy this deal, they sell out their own country and citizens.


13 posted on 08/10/2006 11:42:00 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

I've been thinking/hoping that it's psyop too.

Many of the Arab govt's want the Hezzies destroyed too (the old Sunni-vs-Shiite, Arab-vs-Persian stuff), and I would hope by now that many of the Euroweenies have figured out the same thing... but they're both too chicken$#1+ of their islamists to do anything except play the good-cop role.

I certainly hope it's psy-games on the US side. And I hope against hope the Frogs & Arabs are playing along too.


14 posted on 08/10/2006 11:42:12 AM PDT by sanchmo (If we wish to learn what was going on in Europe in 1938, just look around - V.D. Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

Israel is winning at this point. They would be wholly insane to stop at the very doorstep of final victory. Whatever deal the diplomats have cooked up, let's hope that either one or both sides (yes, I know there are 3 sides in this) dismiss it out of hand...........


15 posted on 08/10/2006 11:44:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mojito
French soldiers are slated to play a major role in such force as well.

If the French Foreign Legion is sent in, they will straighten out the situation in a flash. You don't screw with them.

16 posted on 08/10/2006 11:45:54 AM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH

Yep, this is logistic cover. Olmert has already said Israel will not accept anything that doesn't improve on what UNIFIL hasn't done in Southern Lebanon over the last 18 years. Hizbullah knows its days are numbered, so they will step up pressure on their "useful idiots." When the Israeli offensive begins, the weeping and moaning from the Western Media will be something to behold.


17 posted on 08/10/2006 11:45:58 AM PDT by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mojito
The resolution falls far short of Israel's declared objectives. If it does not lead to the disarming of Hezbollah, it will simply sow the seeds for a far bigger war down the road.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

18 posted on 08/10/2006 11:49:53 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCSteve

Wait til the IDF gets to the Bekaa valley and maybe finds some of dose WMD's dere. The howling from the left ....


19 posted on 08/10/2006 11:54:45 AM PDT by Vindicator1 ( ge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mojito

If it says the implemetation of resolution 1559 is part of it, then that means disarming Hezbollah.


20 posted on 08/10/2006 11:55:02 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson