Posted on 08/09/2006 4:19:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
UNITED NATIONS - The United States and France appeared at odds Wednesday over Arab demands to change a U.N. resolution they are co-sponsoring to call for a complete halt in Israeli-Hezbollah hostilities and withdrawal of Israeli forces, diplomats said.
France proposed new language on a total cease-fire and Israeli pullout, but the Americans rejected it out of concern that without a robust international force, a vacuum would be created in southern Lebanon, a Hezbollah stronghold, the diplomats said.
While both countries welcomed Lebanon's announcement Monday that it will deploy 15,000 soldiers to the south when Israel withdraws, the U.S. does not believe this force and U.N. peacekeepers can prevent a vacuum without the international force, the diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the negotiations are private.
U.S. and French diplomats had been hoping for a vote on the draft early this week. But the differences between the co-sponsors meant that a Security Council vote on the resolution to try to end the fighting would be delayed at least until Thursday.
French President Jacques Chirac appealed to the United States to speed up its response to Arab nations' demands for changes to the resolution, saying that giving up the push for an immediate cease-fire would be the "most immoral" response.
Chirac, who interrupted his vacation in southern France to attend an urgent meeting on Lebanon with three Cabinet ministers, appeared increasingly frustrated with the U.S. position — and even suggested France could present a new version of a draft resolution to the Security Council on its own.
If France and the United States do not reach agreement, he said, "we will have a debate in the Security Council and each will affirm clearly its position, naturally including France, through its own resolution."
France's U.N. Ambassador Jean-Marc de La Sabliere said he still expects a vote this week.
"Our goal is to produce a text that will be helpful, which will help to have the hostilities ending, and a text which will help to a sustainable solution," he said. "The text will be improved, and I am working to improve the text."
U.S. Ambassador John Bolton refused to comment on specifics of the negotiations but acknowledged in an interview that differences remain.
"We're still pressing for a vote on a resolution as early as we can, but we've got to reach agreement, and there are still a lot of issues that need to be considered," Bolton told The Associated Press. "So, when will the vote be? It's hard to say at this point."
Bolton and de La Sabliere were expected to continue their negotiations Wednesday and meet with three Arab envoys who flew to New York to address the Security Council and support the Lebanese government's seven-point plan, which it wants incorporated in the resolution.
The U.S.-French draft circulated Saturday calls for "a full cessation of hostilities," with Hezbollah immediately stopping all attacks and Israel ending offensive military operations. But Israel would still be allowed to take defensive action and there is no call for the withdrawal of its 10,000 troops from southern Lebanon.
Lebanon opposed the draft, saying it favored Israel. The Lebanese government demanded that the cessation of hostilities must be complete and said all Israeli troops must leave, warning that their presence would be viewed as a new occupation and citing Hezbollah's threat to shoot at any Israeli soldiers in the country.
De La Sabliere, asked about these two demands, said "we are trying to incorporate more to take into account the concerns they have expressed about the two issues."
Lebanon also wants the resolution to include a commitment to release Lebanese and Israeli prisoners, an agreement to put the disputed Chebaa Farms area on the Lebanon- Syria-Israel border under U.N. jurisdiction, an extension of Lebanese government authority throughout the country, a beefed-up U.N. force in southern Lebanon and international help to rebuild the country.
At an open Security Council meeting on Tuesday, Qatar's Foreign Minister Hamad bin Jassem Al Thani, speaking on behalf of the Arab delegation, warned Israel that continuing attacks on Lebanon will "sow the seeds of hatred and extremism in the area" rather than restore peace and stability.
___
Associated Press writer Nick Wadhams contributed to this report.
French President Jacques Chirac gestures during a press conference held in Toulon, southern France, Wednesday Aug. 9, 2006, following a special cabinet meeting on the situation in Lebanon and the Middle East. French President Jacques Chirac said Wednesday that giving up on efforts to secure an immediate Mideast cease-fire would be the international community's 'most immoral' possible response. (AP Photo/Remy de la Mauviniere)
Jacques wanted a retreat clause included.
Wow that was quick even for the French! The French did not even wait a whole week before surrendering to the Terrorists this time.
Arab league says jump the French jump.
A solution putting Lebanese forces and some goofball UN forces on the border is a slight improvement over what the situation was before, but it won't stop Hezbollah from regrouping and re-arming.
The only solution that would work is to put an armed force in their willing to actually shoot at Hezbollah.
Let it continue till Israel gets into a better position and mops up more Hezzies.
Leni
France made a deal and agreed to text that they then wanted to change. How very French of them.
This is the same garbage they pulled over the Iraq resolution. The French were gung-ho until their Arab friends applied enough pressure to get them to surrender.
France has come a long way from the French Underground days.
France rejects it's own proposal out of hand!
At least they can stand up to themselves...
The right position is:
Hizb'Allah vacates the Lebanon (since they initiated the issue).
Israel vacates the Lebanon (problem solved).
Frace has its knickers reversed and inside-out.
I'm shocked and surprised.
French changes to resolution rankle U.S., French changes resolution TO rankle U.S.... there, i fixed it.
Tant piss...
Isn't this similar to what they did before we went into Iraq? Didn't they promise Powell something and then turned around and stabbed us in the back?
It's clear there is no French word for "Rope a dope".
"The only solution that would work is to put an armed force in their willing to actually shoot at Hezbollah."
No. The only solution is for Israel to rout Hezbollah, chase them into Syria, take out the entire Syrian army and threaten to turn Iran into a non-oil producing country if they don't call off the dogs.
In the same breath, the US kills Al Sadr and his henchmen and declare that if radical Islam rears its ugly head again, Iran and Saudi Arabia will cease to exist.
Of course this is done after the president signs the bill to drill ANWR and other areas within the US.
UN Resolution
What the hell is that
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.