Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Babies may absorb smoke residue in home
KARE 11 ^ | 07 AUGUST 2006 | KARE 11

Posted on 08/07/2006 9:30:09 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

As any parent knows, crawling babies explore the world by touching - and tasting - anything they can get their wet little hands on.

If their parents use tobacco, that curiosity may expose babies to what some doctors are calling "thirdhand" smoke - particles and gases given off by cigarettes that cling to walls, clothes and even hair and skin. Up to 90% of the nicotine in cigarette smoke sticks to nearby surfaces, says Georg Matt, a professor at San Diego State University.

Preliminary research by Matt and others suggests the same chemicals that leave a stale cigarette odor on clothes and upholstery also can be swallowed, inhaled or absorbed through the skin of non-smokers. Smoke residue may linger for hours, days or months, depending on the ventilation and the level of contamination. In some cases, contaminants may need to be removed by rigorously cleaning or replacing wallpaper, rugs and drapes, Matt says.

Matt cautions that his research needs to be confirmed by other studies. But his work suggests that babies may take in nicotine and other chemicals just by hugging their mothers - even if their mothers never light up next to them.

About 43% of children ages 2 months to 11 years live with a smoker, according to research described in Matt's 2004 study in the journal Tobacco Control.

In his small study of 49 infants under 13 months old, Matt found nicotine in the air and dust throughout smokers' homes, even when parents smoked only outside. Tests also found a nicotine byproduct, cotinine, in babies' urine and inside shafts of their hair.

As expected, babies whose parents smoked around them had the highest cotinine levels - nearly 50 times higher than the babies of non-smokers, according to the study.

Smokers who tried to shield their infants had only partial success, Matt says. The babies of parents who smoked only outside had cotinine levels seven times higher than in the infants of non-smokers, the study showed.

Adults also may be exposed to significant smoke residue if they rent cars, hotel rooms or apartments that have soaked up years of smoke, Matt says. He worries more about youngsters, however, because they may be exposed day and night for years.

Children also may be at greater risk because they breathe faster than adults and inhale more chemicals, says Jonathan Winickoff, an assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. Crawling babies may take in chemicals through their skin.

Though scientists have extensive evidence about the damage caused by secondhand smoke, they know relatively little about the potential risks of thirdhand exposure, says Brett Singer, a scientist at California's Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. "The million-dollar question is: How dangerous is this?" Singer says. "We can't say for sure this is a health hazard."

Matt agrees that doctors should study children - ideally for 10 or 15 years or more - to see whether low levels of smoke residue worsen asthma or harm the development of a child's lungs.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: denial; health; pufflist; tobaccoaddicts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-234 next last
To: nopardons
People live longer today and I challenge your figure.

Don't be silly. Everyone dies, and there is always a reason. Do you find it surprising that death by falling off horses has fallen yet death by cancer has risen?

81 posted on 08/07/2006 10:34:45 PM PDT by burzum (Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mordacious

If you think that's bad, try cleaning out a house where the occupant had 10 cats for 40 years. That stink cannot be removed. The only thing that works on that is a match.


82 posted on 08/07/2006 10:35:18 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Triggerhippie
Mmmmm... Bar-room fresh!

Lol. As kids, we used to joke that my Aunt Rosey's favorite perfume was Ashtray by Phillipe Maurice.

83 posted on 08/07/2006 10:36:00 PM PDT by Mordacious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Yes galleries and auction houses are much more likely to properly care for paintings. I know what you mean about the soot. I am always amazed when there is an article about art restoration showing the results of centuries of soot, grime, dirt and other crap being cleared away. Wow who knew that the Sistine Chapel had color in it!!!.


84 posted on 08/07/2006 10:37:58 PM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: burzum

Perhaps that's because cancer is better detected than it was when people rode horses instead of cars.


85 posted on 08/07/2006 10:38:46 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You are welcome. I wish you a long and healthy life.


86 posted on 08/07/2006 10:39:04 PM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
If you think that's bad, try cleaning out a house where the occupant had 10 cats for 40 years.That stink cannot be removed. The only thing that works on that is a match.

Yeah, that definitely sounds like a job for your friendly neighborhood torch :)

87 posted on 08/07/2006 10:40:32 PM PDT by Mordacious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
That's VERY weird, indeed and almost unbelievable.

Almost unbelievable? So you think I'm almost a liar?

88 posted on 08/07/2006 10:43:21 PM PDT by Mordacious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: burzum

Plus people are eating more processed foods, and the chemistry used in them than they did 100 years ago.
Refined sugar consumption, a POISON, has increased dramatically. That alone causes cancer and other serious diseases, like diabetes.


89 posted on 08/07/2006 10:43:45 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: burzum
Yes, everyone dies, but 50% of them don't die from cancer. That's is what I was challenging.

Nobody dies from the measles, today, either. :-)

90 posted on 08/07/2006 10:44:10 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Chena
Tell your sister that I don't use margarine, but I do eat meat and I'll probably out live her; as will President Bush. :-)

Oh yes........follow the money!

91 posted on 08/07/2006 10:46:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: abner

So do I.


92 posted on 08/07/2006 10:47:18 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"If their parents use tobacco, that curiosity may expose babies to what some doctors are calling "thirdhand" smoke - particles and gases given off by cigarettes that cling to walls, clothes and even hair and skin."

And my Aunt may be my uncle is she stitched on a pair of testicles, but it ain't happening.

Seriously, these scientists are always coming up with these doom and gloom theories. They are doing it for one reason, and one reason only.....they need more funding. When the donations and grant money are running low, BINGO! we get another reason why we all are going to die tomorrow if these scientists don't get funding.

My theory on "global warming" is that it is caused by all the hot air coming from these scientists and Al Gore. Duct tape their mouths and we will have another ice age before you can spit.
93 posted on 08/07/2006 10:48:09 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid - Kierkegaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

So.... if people have more abortions they can place the fetuses around the home in order to reduce smoke residue? Sheesh. (Rolling eyes) Embryonic stem cells, smoke residue absorbers - - what will those sick liberal Democrat scumbags at Planned Parenthood think of next?


94 posted on 08/07/2006 10:49:06 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I looked up the number and it is currently listed at about 25% (PDF) for the US. Depending on whether we get better at fighting heart disease, cancer, or other diseases, that number will rise or fall. It is high right now because of the reduction of deaths due to accidental causes or simple infections.
95 posted on 08/07/2006 10:54:06 PM PDT by burzum (Despair not! I shall inspire you by charging blindly on!--Minsc, BG2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

My mom was a smoker. She turned 93 last month.


96 posted on 08/07/2006 10:54:20 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I don't think smoking causes cancer directly, it most likely just helps cancers take hold in a body which is weak from a whole variety of reasons, poor diet, exposure to other harmfull chemicals, such as working in a metal refinery, or a plastic molding factory, a paint factory, cloth factory, welding, diesel shop, etc etc.

people smoked, and DIDN'T die when they worked outdoors and chopped wood. Even non- smoking farmers died of black lung from inhaling SOIL and grain dust.


97 posted on 08/07/2006 10:55:53 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

try www.FreeCycle.org


98 posted on 08/07/2006 10:56:41 PM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mordacious

OMG That's funny!


99 posted on 08/07/2006 10:57:51 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
Are you being serious, or just uninformed?

Auction houses and most galleries, don't "take care" of the paintings they sell...they sell them. Sometimes they do get paintings cleaned, but not always. They are just the middlemen between the seller and the buyer; that's it.

I have a smallish painting ( oil ) that I inherited. It belonged to my great grandmother. She didn't smoke, but my great grandfather sometimes smoked a pipe. The painting was very dirty; dirty from age and exposure to whatever was in where they had lived. My grandmother never hung that picture and I was the first to do so.

I had the painting cleaned about 26 years ago. It's now very vibrant and I like it a lot. Oh, and BTW, I smoke and the painting still looks brand new. As a matter of fact, I have now smoked around it more, for the past 16 years, than I ever did, during the first 25 years I owned it. LOL

100 posted on 08/07/2006 10:58:23 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson