Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israeli Airstrikes Target Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon (Good Shootin)
Fox News ^ | 8/7/2006 | Fox News/AP

Posted on 08/07/2006 11:46:45 AM PDT by tobyhill

BEIRUT, Lebanon — Israeli troops shot down an explosive-laden drone aircraft Monday, FOX News has learned, as Israel continued its assault on Hezbollah guerrillas along the southern border of Lebanon.

The drone, an Ababil, was shot down over the Mediterranean Sea near the port city of Haifa, the Israeli Defense Forces told FOX News. Officials believe it may have been headed for Tel Aviv. Ababils are Iranian-made aircraft that can be shot from a pneumatic launcher, according to Globalsecurity.org.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; hezbos; israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2006 11:46:46 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Just wondering - there must be some Iranian rebel groups that Israel can supply with sophisticated weapons...
2 posted on 08/07/2006 11:48:29 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Currently the U.S. is pursuing "diplomatic" efforts to end the War between Israel and Hizballah. While this may in fact be simply a ploy to look good in front of the media, should we be discussing how to put an end to Isreal irradicating a threat to the world?

I have my doubts as to whether the U.S. actually wants a cease-fire prior to the dismantling of Hizballah. However, if this is the truth, then the U.S. should state its policy and not back away from it. If we push forward with a premature cease-fire, this only benefits the enemy. We're trying to score big with "public opinion," but they could care less about the current admin. anyway.

I imagine the current actions of the administration will have a big role come November and this could explain our role, but couldn't some step back and say that our current actions compared to those in Afghanistan and Iraq are contradictary?


3 posted on 08/07/2006 11:50:36 AM PDT by dynamite98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

There are groups within Iran that hate their government but the only problem is they hate Israel worse.


4 posted on 08/07/2006 11:51:26 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

"Some analysts assume, that Hezbollah used an "Ababil" type UAV produced by Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industries (HESA). "Ababil" UAV is a canard configuration and similar in size to "Mheger 4": wing span - 3,25 m, fuselage length - 2,9 m. It is launched by a pneumatic launcher or by a rocket, and uses a parachute to land. "Ababil" can fly in an autopilot mode, however its operator can also guide the UAV remotely from the ground. The drone has a more powerful (25 hp) engine than "Mheger 4", and according to the manufacturer, it can fly with a cruising speed of 165 knots (about 300 km/hr). As one may see from the table, "Ababil" can carry a 40 kg payload,..."

From the Russian website, "Armscontrol.ru"


5 posted on 08/07/2006 11:52:42 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynamite98
The Hezbos rejected it before it made its way to NY.
6 posted on 08/07/2006 11:53:00 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

I read long ago that US and British Special Forces and Intelligence were arming and training Iranian arabs (southern Iran) to fight as a low level insurgent group. I also understand that Special Forces from time to time cross the Iranian frontier from Kurdistan, do a little damage and then race back across the border.


7 posted on 08/07/2006 11:53:54 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Why isn't the U.S. taking a more active role? When?


8 posted on 08/07/2006 11:57:31 AM PDT by dynamite98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Seems like it's fairly slow (munition wise) and easy to shoot down. Sounds like a lame desperate attempt by the Hezbos to hit Tel-Aviv as was promised.
9 posted on 08/07/2006 11:59:21 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

bttt


10 posted on 08/07/2006 11:59:51 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynamite98

I hope the US just keeps their nose out of it long enough to let Israel take care of business.


11 posted on 08/07/2006 12:01:17 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dynamite98
Why isn't the U.S. taking a more active role? When?

Israel's doing a good enough job, and we've got their backs. What more would you have us do?

12 posted on 08/07/2006 12:01:22 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Seems like it's fairly slow (munition wise) and easy to shoot down.

Not to mention a relatively expensive way to carry only 40 kg of bomb load.

13 posted on 08/07/2006 12:02:13 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dynamite98

You're kidding aren't you?


14 posted on 08/07/2006 12:02:19 PM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Secretary Rice should take a long vacation on a tropical beach somewhere until Hizbolla's wiped out.


15 posted on 08/07/2006 12:07:02 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yoe; etcetera

Hizballah isn't the only enemy.

We'll eventually need to address Iran, most likely Syria, possibly N. Korea, China and Russia.

Our military is stretched in Iraq and Afghanistan, but we can't expect Israel to take on the Middle East themselves. I agree they're getting the job done, but who will take the lead in getting rid of the President of Iran and their arsenal?

Will it be solely Israel, or U.S., Isreal, Britain combined?

The U.S. also has cause to go into Syria. (Hint: WMD's)

I'm just thinking two steps ahead, not day-to-day.


16 posted on 08/07/2006 12:07:24 PM PDT by dynamite98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
"Just wondering - there must be some Iranian rebel groups that Israel can supply with sophisticated weapons..."

I would say that this is impossible given the side that some in the State Department, CIA, NY Slimes and other Traitorous rags have taken.

Some anti-Bush traitor within the Washington circle would have divulged this to the Drive-By-Media by now.

17 posted on 08/07/2006 12:10:48 PM PDT by lormand (Nuke the Islamic States, or kiss your @55 goodbye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

You never know, a "REAL" plane might just fly into it and blow up /Sarc


18 posted on 08/07/2006 12:13:15 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Eventually the terrorists will be running out of munitions. Maybe that's why the islamic world is screaming for negotiations to get Israel to stop and run away.


19 posted on 08/07/2006 12:34:20 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

They said this morning that there was over 4,000 rocket launches out of approx. 10,000 rockets but I have to figure that Israel has taken out a third of the original total leaving about 2,700 left. One more week will probably do it for Israel in reducing the threat about 95%. The other 5% is built in just for Israel being Israel.


20 posted on 08/07/2006 12:42:32 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson