Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stung Lung: Volatile Chemical May Cut Respiratory Capacity
Science News ^ | 8-6-2006 | Beh Harder

Posted on 08/06/2006 2:18:53 PM PDT by blam

Stung Lung: Volatile chemical may cut respiratory capacity

Ben Harder

A chemical in some air fresheners and pest-control products may slightly impair lung function in millions of people, a nationwide study suggests.

The compound, para-dichlorobenzene, is used to make mothballs, urinal deodorizers, and air-freshening blocks for household use. At room temperature, the strong-smelling chemical gradually changes from a solid to a gas.

Para-dichlorobenzene was previously detected in the blood of more than 95 percent of the participants tested in a U.S. study called NHANES III.

Scientists at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in Research Triangle Park, N.C., looked for effects of the chemical and 10 other volatile organic compounds commonly detected in U.S. residents. Led by internist and epidemiologist Stephanie J. London, the team analyzed NHANES III data from 953 adult volunteers.

The researchers compared the recorded blood concentrations of each of the 11 chemicals to several measures of lung function, including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). They also considered related factors, such as exposure to cigarette smoke.

The tenth of the study's participants who had the most para-dichlorobenzene in their blood—more than 4.4 micrograms per liter—had about 4 percent lower FEV1 values than did the tenth of participants with the lowest blood concentrations—averaging 0.1 µg/l. That difference in FEV1 amounted to an average of 0.15 l. The average FEV1 of people in the study was 3.44 l, the researchers report in the August Environmental Health Perspectives.

While "it's not some huge effect," London says, "at the borderline [of healthy lung function], losing 4 percent of your FEV1 could be a problem."

FEV1 is low in people who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or who are regularly exposed to cigarette smoke. The FEV1 deficit associated with para-dichlorobenzene exposure is on par with that linked to secondhand smoke, London says. One-quarter of the volunteers were smokers, and others had been exposed to secondhand smoke in various amounts. The link between para-dichlorobenzene and reduced lung function persisted even when the researchers took those factors into account.

"This is an interesting new finding that will need to be replicated," comments Ralph J. Delfino of the University of California, Irvine.

Delfino and London agree that para-dichlorobenzene may not be the culprit behind the reduced lung function that London's team reports. Rather, there may be other environmental hazards that are common in homes and workplaces that have products emitting para-dichlorobenzene, London says.

If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: capacity; chemical; cut; health; lung; may; respitory; stung; volatile

1 posted on 08/06/2006 2:18:55 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
The compound, para-dichlorobenzene, is used to make mothballs, urinal deodorizers, and air-freshening blocks for household use. At room temperature, the strong-smelling chemical gradually changes from a solid to a gas.

I guess I'd better quit aiming at the urinal cake.

2 posted on 08/06/2006 2:21:44 PM PDT by dirtboy (Why does Israel take border security seriously but we do not, when Islamists wish us both harm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; neverdem

Thanks for the post. Thanks for all of your science pings, neverdem. Here is one for you.


3 posted on 08/06/2006 2:25:49 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
slightly??

and they use a headline like that?

4 posted on 08/06/2006 2:30:06 PM PDT by GeronL (http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Well, at least this hasn't shown up on snopes.com yet. Sounded like a good candidate, so I checked.


5 posted on 08/06/2006 2:44:42 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Citrus Magic (advertised by Tony Snow on his radio show) is the best air freshener I've ever used and contains no chemicals. There's another aerosol spray can w/similar contents called Pure Citrus. I bought one of these to compare q/Citrus Magic. It's good too, but I prefer Citrus Magic.


6 posted on 08/06/2006 3:58:23 PM PDT by Carolinamom (Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue. ---Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
I always wonder what was in Febreeze. The ingredients only says odor elimanator.

But this may help

http://www.ciao.co.uk/Febreeze__Review_5142664

7 posted on 08/06/2006 4:18:08 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
more than 4.4 micrograms per liter

Thats a boatload of the stuff - the article doesn't specify if this was naturally aquired or if they challenged the subjects with administered chemical.

With the sensitivity of current equipment you can find pretty much anything in everybody but 4.4 mikes/L sounds like they found people who snort mothballs.

8 posted on 08/06/2006 5:13:49 PM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Yeah, don't piss off the urinal cakes (pardon the pun).


9 posted on 08/06/2006 5:38:31 PM PDT by gotribe (It's not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why doesn't the gov't require all businesses to post a "Do Not Eat the Urinal Cakes" sign on every bathroom door? Somebody has to protect the drunk and the ignorant.
10 posted on 08/06/2006 5:42:25 PM PDT by Nachoman (Have you hugged a Garand today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Here's a chemical we really should be worried about: DHMO

http://www.dhmo.org/


11 posted on 08/06/2006 6:30:42 PM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

12 posted on 08/06/2006 10:53:06 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson