To: nutmeg
2 posted on
08/05/2006 5:11:52 PM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Graybeard58
Theres another way...
Like myself and most of the kids I grew up with.....
Boy Scouts
Girl Scouts
3 posted on
08/05/2006 5:13:58 PM PDT by
digger48
To: Graybeard58
Liberals won't stop until they decide what we can eat, when we can shower and brush our teeth, when we can have a bowel movement, when we can exercise, where we can drive, how much we can work for and how long we can work for it, where we can sleep and how we'll be buried when we die. Socialism is truly cradle to grave. I kid y'all not.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
4 posted on
08/05/2006 5:14:49 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Graybeard58
Let's have special jumping instruction for the white boys.
8 posted on
08/05/2006 5:23:07 PM PDT by
Socratic
("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
To: Graybeard58
America has a "swimming gap," with racist origins, of course. Minority children 10 to 14 are more than four times as likely to drown than their white peers because, according to The Hartford Courant, Southern plantation owners prevented slaves from learning to swim so they would be less likely to escape. "I agree. We should compensate any former slaves that have drowned in these public swimming pools.
To: Graybeard58
Of course, that would require the construction (with union labor) of hundreds of new school pools at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars, plus the hiring of many more (unionized) gym teachers/swimming instructors. Nonsense. IF the state determined it had an interest in swimming instruction (gotta start with some premise ...), then give the families a voucher for Red Cross swimming lessons, and verify that the student had taken the course before admitting him to the new school grade.
Ipso facto, all over.
10 posted on
08/05/2006 5:29:47 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(I've always wanted to be 40 ... and it's as good as I anticipated!)
The responsibility for teaching children to swim belongs to their parents, not the state. It's saner, simpler and far less expensive than another any massive government debacle.
To: Graybeard58
Connecticut has minorities???
Oh. They're probably referring to people with net worths under a million dollars.
13 posted on
08/05/2006 5:40:45 PM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: Graybeard58
Pools at the schools is probably a good idea.
I've swum at inner city public pools. There was very little actual swimming to be seen -- mostly just coarse horseplay.
They tend to be dirty, dangerous places. The lifeguards are shouted at, ignored and abused. Some are victims of sexual harassment and even assault.
16 posted on
08/05/2006 5:52:32 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: Graybeard58
782 American children 14 or under drowned in 2003, the last year for which statistics are available, but drowning rates have been declining steadily in recent decades. Each drowning is a tragedy, but the National Safety Council says the average American child is more likely to die in a plane crash than drown accidentally
Isn't that wrong? How can the chance of a child getting killed in a plane crash be higher than drowning when the number of kids who get killed in plane crashes is much lower than those who drown?
17 posted on
08/05/2006 5:57:31 PM PDT by
RFC_Gal
(It's not just a boulder; It's a rock! A ro-o-ock. The pioneers used to ride these babies for miles!)
To: Graybeard58
When do we institute the gun safety and shooting classes?
18 posted on
08/05/2006 5:58:59 PM PDT by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Gabz
You are not gonna believe this nanny state mandate.
23 posted on
08/05/2006 6:58:13 PM PDT by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: Graybeard58; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...
Nanny State PING.........
Personally, I do think everyone should learn to swim, and at a young age............however, I'm not the government.
24 posted on
08/05/2006 7:36:30 PM PDT by
Gabz
(Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
it never ends i have not read any comments on this article so far but i would bet my life savings that 30-40 percent of the preepers responding are all for this
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
25 posted on
08/05/2006 7:38:25 PM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: Graybeard58
>>>>National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Foundation funding provided by Healthy People 2010
Injury-Related Websites Links to organizations found at this site are provided solely as a service. These links do not constitute an endorsement of these organizations or their programs by the Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC), the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), or the Federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC and NCIPC are not responsible for the content of the individual organizations' web pages found at these links.
Subject Access to Injury Information Resources
Subject Access to Health Information Resources
|
|
28 posted on
08/05/2006 7:50:13 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Graybeard58
Jeez. Don't let W hear about this. He'll propose another Federal program: The Department of Homeland Swimming.
In the interest of bi-partisinship, the President will appoint well known swimmer, Senator Ted Kennedy to oversea the department.
Senator John Kerry, Democrat MA will be responsible for developing the swimming training curriculum.
46 posted on
08/05/2006 8:31:49 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
To: Graybeard58
Let me guess, they need to raise tobacco and alcohol taxes to pay for them, right?
In a somewhat unrelated, but related manner, just today I received an advertisement from Scott's Corporation asking me to sign up for their lawn care service. I'm sure you all recall them as being one of the companies that have decided to test employees for off the job tobacco use and fire them if they ever smoke, anywhere.
Being the evil smoker I am, I sent it back with "WARNING: Sent by a smoking household" on the outside of the envelope. Inside, instead of the application order sheet, I wrote the following in a note; "Thank you for considering me for this service. However, I feel compelled to decline due to my being a tobacco user and your companies senibility against tobacco. As you are so concerned about the use of tobacco, a legal product, I would not like to subject any of your employees to my smoke. Again, thank you for thinking of me and I sincerely do regret my having to sever our over 30 year relationship of my using your product."
To: Graybeard58; Gabz
"Opponents will be condemned as racists, and if that fails, there's always the old saw: 'If it saves one life, it would be worth it.'"
Smoking Bans.
Eminent Domain.
Seatbelts.
Helmets.
Concealed Carry.
Your Weight.
Stupid Drug Laws.
Light Pollution.
Your Bedroom Activities.
Global Warming.
Banning Soda in School.
Mandatory Immunizations.
Farm Animal Tagging.
Electronic Chipping for Man and Beast.
Gee. I'm starting to see a pattern here! And I'm not all that smart to begin with. Wonder how many really stupid people welcome this invasion of their personal and property rights with open arms? *Rolleyes*
62 posted on
08/06/2006 5:56:03 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson