Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Light Pollution (If you think it's a joke, think again. The movement seeks to change laws)
Campaign for Dark Skies (CfDS.org) ^ | 8-5-06 | J. Appleton

Posted on 08/05/2006 2:32:45 PM PDT by sully777

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last
To: shempy
Cool. I hope the new technology catches on. BTW, anything happening with LED lighting in your field?
261 posted on 08/06/2006 6:25:46 PM PDT by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: stevio
SOME lighting engineers(who I doubt are worthy of the name engineer)just love arrays of ground mounted high power flood lights aimed up towards the clients' buildings. They call it "painting with light" and claim it showcases the architecture and enhances security. If inside one of those buildings you can't see nothing outside but the glare.A large portion of the light is wasted in the air above the buildings.But "design",installation and maintenance is simple and easy!

Reminds me of a neighbor and landlord who installed electric resistance heating in his uninsulated rental house.After all he wasn't planning on paying the monthly utility bill and electric resistance heat was the least expensive to install.Renter after renter left suddenly upon getting $400 monthly electric bill come cold weather.

There is always an easy way and the right way;seldom are they the same.

262 posted on 08/06/2006 6:45:11 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
"What kind of person lives next door to a shopping center anyway? That's a zoning problem, not a lighting problem."

Plenty of these things were built next to existing homes. Those people don't have much of a choice.

"And, you would probably be the first to sue the store if you tripped over a bump or got mugged becasue of insufficient lighting."

With all due respect, are you even able to follow what people here are saying?

I said point the lights towards the ground and at your building. Cap the tops of the lights so it doesn't just go upwards where it does no good. Unless you are one of these nuts that think washing out the night sky in yellow lights is some sort of conservative value or a sign of economic progress, where on Earth could you possibly think this is a stupid idea?
263 posted on 08/06/2006 7:28:19 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (Fitzmas Has Been Canceled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Unless you are one of these nuts that think washing out the night sky in yellow lights is some sort of conservative value or a sign of economic progress, where on Earth could you possibly think this is a stupid idea?

Government mandates are generally stupid ideas.

264 posted on 08/06/2006 8:09:52 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
where on Earth could you possibly think this is a stupid idea?...Government mandates are generally stupid ideas.

I wholeheartedly agree. We do not need the government to intervene for every cause that comes out of the woodwork. When we live in an age where "eminent domain" has gone from a rarely used last resort for the public good, to a "tool" for engineering "economic progress", the last thing society needs is government regulations dictating the use of light. Enough, already! How much social engineering must we put up with?

265 posted on 08/06/2006 10:32:38 PM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: biggerten

I own property and believe in property rights. But I'm civic minded, I allow a high-powered security light in my neighborhood sponsored by my city without complaint. It happens to flood my backyard with light. But I simply close the shades. I know my elderly neighbors feel secure and my other neighbors can easily use the light to spot intruders if necessary. The light also bedevils any peeping toms that wish to visit a window or two.

As a business owner, I am commercial minded. The growth of urban sprawl delights me. Neons make me smile. Street lights make it easier to see roads, stray animals, etc.. The low-powered lights are useless without more of them used,, which IMO, defeats the purpose.

I concede that lights should be more economic, which they have become. I concede that solar power would be advantageous as a back-up to all outdoor lighting. But, I am most concerned about infringing on commercial viability with pseudo-science that states as fact light is pollution.

BTW, your twice mentioning the size of your telescope made me chuckle in a sophomoric way. I could not resist the Freudian reference.


266 posted on 08/07/2006 8:25:53 AM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: sully777

I am civic minded as well. If I'm doing something that bothers my neighbors, I'd like to know about it so that I can quit annoying them. If everyone had respectful neighbors regulations wouldn't be needed.

I don't know what solar power has to do with this. I just want my yard dark so I can enjoy my hobby.

If you welcome the light on your property, fine. You have yet to justify other folks right to become a nuisance and prohibit my enjoyment of my property, and I suspect you never will, as it's not a reasonable thing to defend.

I suspect we've worn out this argument anyway. I hope nobody interferes with your enjoyment of your property, and if you move next to me with floodlights, I know what a BB gun is for.

I also have a penlight type laser aimed at particularly pesky security light to foil the light sensor and turn it off when I need to.

Have a good day. As for sophomoric responses, I'll try not to think of you in your house, with the shades drawn, speculating on the size of other folk's tools.

Take care.


267 posted on 08/07/2006 9:37:55 AM PDT by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: biggerten

As for sophomoric responses, I'll try not to think of you in your house, with the shades drawn, speculating on the size of other folk's tools.



Goodgod I hope not.


268 posted on 08/07/2006 9:58:40 AM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: sully777
I have to take biggerton's side in this one. There's no good reason to light up large vacant lots all night with the orange mercury vapor lights that shine up and out as well as down. Out in the middle of Nevada, miles from any population. I've seen timers on lamp posts that shut down or drop to maybe 25% power after midnight.

Sure, leave the lights on all night in the high crime areas, but there are countless places where timers or some other creative solution would be preferable to the neighbors 5000 watt neon yard light fooding your yard and bedroom all night.

If you are walking around at night, and are afraid of tripping over something - do what millions of folks have done for years - get a flashlight.

269 posted on 08/07/2006 10:27:25 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

You'll hate this point then: The city light in my neighborhood NEVER turns off.


270 posted on 08/07/2006 10:34:25 AM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: kittycatonline.com
> the last thing society needs is government regulations dictating the use of light.

Point this wherever you like. Shine it at jetliners. It's PROGRESS!!!!!

271 posted on 08/07/2006 1:47:22 PM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: sully777
All the envirowackoisms aside, I do think there should be more consideration of neighbors when commercial construction and school construction decides on their outside lighting. I live behind a grade school which has outdoor floodlights that are left on year-round. They don't just flood the schoolyard, but everything around it.

My question is this: Why do you presume to light up my back yard and bedroom windows at night for me? Is it any more expensive to choose light fixtures that control the beam a bit more and keep it on your own property?

272 posted on 08/07/2006 1:59:08 PM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
The engineers and especially the installers don't work at night so they don't see any problems.

I wonder are those who somehow see shining a light in the neighbors' windows also approving of loud stereos blasting until 3 a.m. ?

After all,if you can draw the blinds then you can put in earplugs,too.

Let each person have the freedom to light ,or ont light, his own property.

273 posted on 08/07/2006 5:26:48 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
the last thing society needs is government regulations dictating the use of light...{pic of green laser} Point this wherever you like. Shine it at jetliners. It's PROGRESS!!!!!

Okay, fine, howsabout a revision: "The last thing society needs is government regulations dictating the use of non-laser light."

274 posted on 08/07/2006 6:22:58 PM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham
I wonder are those who somehow see shining a light in the neighbors' windows also approving of loud stereos blasting until 3 a.m. ?

I suspect that the difference between "ambient sound" and "loud stereo blasting" is far greater than "ambient light" and "you're messing up my stargazing light."

275 posted on 08/07/2006 6:27:07 PM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: kittycatonline.com
> "The last thing society needs is government regulations dictating the use of non-laser light."

Yay! That means I can put xenon flash lamps on the back of my car!


And point these at low flying aircraft!


And use one of these to project hard-core porn onto the sides of nearby churches and schools!
After all... it's *just* light. It's not like it's pollution or anything.
276 posted on 08/07/2006 7:00:32 PM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
Yay! That means I can put xenon flash lamps on the back of my car!

And that's different from those weird bright-blue headlights the "wannabe fast-n-furious" kids put in their plasticky Hondas and Mitsubishis with the 300-pound airfoils on the back?

And point these at low flying aircraft!

If it's flying that low, it might not be such a bad idea. Maybe the guy's instrumentation is busted. Losta pilots find mountains in the middle of the "sky", ya know.

And use one of these to project hard-core porn onto the sides of nearby churches and schools

Pff, that's so old school. Folks already did that for a Robert Mapelthorpe outdoor extravaganza. I forgot it was at, it definately was outdoor, though. I think it was on the outside of some "artsy" place.

I doubt that the "dark skies" folks have xenon lamps or outdoor theatres in mind, though. Well, maybe they do have outdoor theatres in mind, but I do believe this discussion centered more around affecting existing businessess and homes. If you've got your xenon flashlamp rear bumper already rigged up, you might get grandfathered in. Your porno-show-on-a-church would certianly get pro bono from the ACLU, but I think the FAA wouldn't go for the "grandfather rights" on the arc light, though.

Here, let me give you a fine example: Proper flag etiquette calls for illuminating outdoor flags at night, and this almost certainly calls for upward illumination. If some guy has his flagpole out there and he's doing Old Glory justice, I don't see how the petulant whining of some astronomer trumps the proper display of our flag. Same for some guy who's got a laundromat on the corner and it's been there for 15 years. None of this "Dark Skies" talk works unless you apply it to existing strucutres; grandfathering existing structures won't provide any real reduction in light pollution. I would hope that local assemblymen (or whatever you call your local leaders) would exercise enough common sense to see that forcing burdeonsome regulations on local businessess for the sake of a priviledged few is a complete waste of time and money.

277 posted on 08/07/2006 10:06:38 PM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: kittycatonline.com

> the petulant whining of some astronomer

What, you mean like the petulant whining of someone who wants to light up the sky? Someone who whines that locals laws *save* him money? Someone who whines that laws might make him clean up his act and improve the quality of life for his neighbors?

> burdeonsome regulations on local businessess for the sake of a priviledged few

A) What is "burdensome" about using your lights more efficiently? That's like a gun owner at a range claiming that it is a "burdensome" regulation that he must only fire his weapon when pointed in the general direction of the target, not just spray randomly into the sky.
B) That "priviledged few" is everybody who wants to see the night sky, not just astronomers.
C) Very few people want to light up their flag displays at night. That makes them a "priviledged few." Plus, these are the folk who are just plain lazy. Can't be bothered to go to the trouble of taking their flags down when they should come down; instead, they can only gin up the strength to flip a light switch.


278 posted on 08/08/2006 7:11:46 AM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
I find it disrespectful to leave the flag out in inclement weather,nailed or painted to the side of a building,etc.But some consider themselves patriots by doing so.It is easier to just put a ground mounted light to shine into the sky than take the time to show proper respect for the nation's flag.

I can't think why no one doesn't sell or use a ball light on top of the flagpole for illumination.The wiring could simply run inside or alongside the flagpole and if the upper portion of the light fixture is internally reflective and externally opaque the flag ,yet not the sky, could be lit.

Since few low flying aircraft will patronize the laundry on the corner,it might better use the lights to illuminate just its own grounds and parking.

279 posted on 08/08/2006 3:10:02 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

No...but I think I might know Ted....is he from PA?


280 posted on 08/12/2006 3:38:06 AM PDT by KeepUSfree (WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson