Posted on 08/05/2006 7:41:46 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein
August 5, 2006 - 10:21
Amongst the many fulminations by Derrick Z. Jackson in his Boston Globe column of this morning, The Divide Remains, this one leapt out at me: "the great gorge between the working poor and the wasteful rich remains far from being bridged."
Jackson never gets around to substantiating his 'wasteful rich' slap. Hard to see it as other than a gratuitous slur by a entrenched class warrior. Jackson is the apparent captive of a socialist mindset in which 'the rich' are straight-from-Monopoly caricatures who steal from the poor while not laying about or downing champagne in big-band nightclubs.
Other annotated tidbits from Jackson's column, written in praise of minimum wage increases and condemnation of those would oppose them:
"The Legislature ignored ridiculous rationalizations against an increase and overrode Governor Mitt Romney's veto of the hike. The minimum wage will be $8 an hour by 2008. When he vetoed the increase, Romney whined that 'such abrupt and disproportionate increases would threaten to eliminate jobs in Massachusetts.'"
Ridiculous rationaliziations? Try this one, Mr. Jackson: it's not the legislature's money. If it wants to improve the lot of the working poor, perhaps they should consider increasing welfare, and let taxpayers fund it, rather than imposing what amounts to a tax on the very people who are offering jobs to low-skilled workers.
"Even as advocates for the working poor were celebrating here and in places like Chicago, where the city council passed an ordinance requiring 'big-box' retailers such as Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and Target to pay $10 an hour by 2010, virtually everyone knows this is the least that politicians can do. The progressive think tanks of United for a Fair Economy and the Institute for Policy Studies have calculated that if the minimum wage had risen at the same rate of CEO pay since 1990, it would stand at $23 an hour."
So $10/hour is 'the least' employers can do. Jackson would apparently like to see a $23/hr. minimum wage, but fails to inform us how many millions of entry-level workers would be left unemployed as a result.
Concludes Jackson: "Even with the rises around the nation, America's wealth and income remains cut into proportions beyond moral justification."
Give Jackson credit for not being coy in calling for the application of government power to radically redistribute income. From each according to his abilities, to each . . .
Boston Globe/NewsBusters class-warfare ping to Today show list.
How much does Jackson make and how much does he give away to the "pur."
While I agree with point of his article, he lost me with this particular suggestion.
Link to Derrick Z's column:
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/05/the_divide_remains/
Elbert Hubbard
In all this Cuban business there is one man stands out on the horizon of my memory like Mars at perihelion. When war broke out between Spain and the United States, it was very necessary to communicate quickly with the leader of the Insurgents. Garcia was somewhere in the mountain fastnesses of Cubano one knew where. No mail or telegraph could reach him. The President must secure his co-operation, and quickly. What to do!
Someone said to the President, "There's a fellow by the name of Rowan will find Garcia for you, if anybody can." Rowan was sent for and given a letter to be delivered to Garcia. How "the fellow by name of Rowan" took the letter, sealed it up in an oil-skin pouch, strapped it over his heart, in four days landed by night off the coast of Cuba from an open boat, disappeared into the jungle, and in three weeks came out on the other side of the island, having traversed a hostile country on foot delivered his letter to Garciaare things I have no special desire now to tell in detail.
The point I wish to make is this: McKinley gave Rowan a letter to be delivered to Garcia; Rowan took the letter and did not ask, "Where is he at?" By the Eternal! There is a man whose form should be cast in deathless bronze and the statue placed in every college in the land. It is not book-learning young men need, nor instruction about this or that, but a stiffening of the vertebrae which will cause them to be loyal to a trust, to act promptly, concentrate their energies; do the thing "Carry a message to Garcia." General Garcia is dead now, but there are other Garcias.
No man, who has endeavored to carry out an enterprise where many hands were needed, but has been well-nigh appalled at times by the imbecility of the average man the inability or unwillingness to concentrate on a tying and do it. Slipshod assistance, foolish inattention, dowdy indifference, and half-hearted work seem the rule; and no man succeeds, unless by hook or crook, or threat, he forces or bribes other men to assist him; or mayhap, God in His goodness performs a miracle, and sends him an Angel of Light for an assistant.
You, reader, put this matter to a test: You are sitting now in your officesix clerks are within your call. Summon any one and make this request: "Please look in the encyclopedia and make a brief memorandum for me concerning the life of Correggio." Will the clerk quietly say, "Yes, sir," and go do the task?" On your life, he will not. He will look at you out of a fishy eye,and ask one or more of the following questions: Who was he? Which encyclopedia? Where is the encyclopedia? Was I hired for that? Don't you mean Bismarck? What's the matter with Charlie doing it? Is he dead? Is there any hurry? Shan't I bring you the book and let you look it up yourself? What do you want to know for? And I will lay you ten to one that after you have answered the questions, and explained how to find the information, and why you want it, the clerk will go off and get one of the other clerks to help him find Garcia and then come back and tell you there is no such man. Of course I may lose my bet, but according to the Law of Average, I will not. Now if you are wise you will not bother to explain to your "assistant" that Correggio is indexed under the C's, not in the K's, but you will smile sweetly and say, "Never mind," and go look it up yourself.
And this incapacity for independent action, this moral stupidity, this infirmity of the will, this nwillingness to cheerfully catch hold and lift, are the things that put pure socialism so far into the future. If men will not act for themselves, what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all? A first mate with knotted club seems necessary; and the dread of getting "the bounce" Saturday night holds many a worker in his place.
Advertise for a stenographer, and nine times out of ten who apply can neither spell nor punctuateand do not think it necessary to. Can such a one write a letter to Garcia?
"You see that bookkeeper" said the foreman to me in a large factory."Yes, what about him?" "Well, he's a fine accountant, but if I'd send him to town on an errand, he might accomplish the errand all right, and, on the other hand, might stop at four saloons on the way, and when he got to Main Street, would forget what he had been sent for." Can such a man be entrusted to carry a message to Garcia?
We have recently been hearing much maudlin sympathy expressed for the "down-trodden denizen of the sweat shop" and the "homeless wanderer searching for honest employment," and with it all often go many hard words for the men in power. Nothing is said about the employer who grows old before his time in a vain attempt to get frowsy ne'er-do-wells to do intelligent work; and his long patient striving with "help" that does nothing but loaf when his back is turned. In every store and factory there is a constant we "help" that have shown their incapacity to further the interests of the business, and others are being taken on. No matter how good times are, this sorting continues, only if times are hard and work is scarce, this sorting is done finer but out and forever out, the incompetent and unworthy go. It is the survival of the fittest. Self-interest prompts every employer to keep the bestthose who can carry a message to Garcia.
I know one man of really brilliant parts who has not the ability to manage a business of his own, and yet who is absolutely worthless to anyone else, because he carries with him constantly the insane suspicion that his employer is oppressing, or intending to oppress, him. He can not give orders, and he will not receive them. Should a message be given him to take to Garcia, his answer would probably be, "Take it yourself." Tonight this man walks the streets looking for work, the wind whistling through his threadbare coat. No one who knows him dare employ him, for he is a regular firebrand of discontent. He is impervious to reason, and the only thing that can impress him is the toe of a thick-soled No. 9 boot.
Of course I know that one so morally deformed is no less to be pitied than a physical cripple; but in your pitying, let us drop a tear, too, for the men who are striving to carry on a great enterprise, whose working hours are not limited by the whistle, and whose hair is fast turning white through the struggle to hold the line in dowdy indifference, slipshod imbecility, and the heartless ingratitude which, but for their enterprise, would be both hungry and homeless.
Have I put the matter too strongly? Possibly I have; but when all the world has gone a-slumming I wish to speak a word of sympathy for the man who succeeds the man who, against great odds, has directed the efforts of others, and, having succeeded, finds there's nothing in it: nothing but bare board and clothes.
I have carried a dinner-pail and worked for a day's wages, and I have also been an employer of labor, and I know there is something to be said on both sides. There is no excellence, per se, in poverty; rags are no recommendation; and all employers are not rapacious and high-handed, any more than all poor men are virtuous.
My heart goes out to the man who does his work when the "boss" is away, as well as when he is home. And the man who, when given a letter for Garcia, quietly takes the missive, without asking any idiotic questions, and with no lurking intention of chucking it into the nearest sewer, or of doing aught else but deliver it, never gets "laid off," nor has to go on strike for higher wages. Civilization is one long anxious search for just such individuals. Anything such a man asks will be granted; his kind is so rare that no employer can afford to let him go. He is wanted in every city, town, and villagein every office, shop, store and factory. The world cries out for such; he is needed, and needed badly the man who can "Carry a Message to Garcia."
and the religious right is a bunch of moralists? What is the morally justifiable wage for every single job? Who decides? This idiot has never even considered those questions.
As the author of the original column, let me clarify that I'm not by any means recommending an increase in welfare; only that it would be a more equitable, less job-killing, approach to the goal Jackson has set.
So I wounder how much of his over inflated salary does Jackson give back to his employer? After all anying over $30,000 a year he makes is obviously way more then he "needs" and is robbing the "poor" of their fair share.
Give it BACK Jackson you Robber Baron!!!!!
If we'd just let the really smart people in our society, like writers and editors of the newspaper, make all the important decisions for us, why, it'd be a wonderful world.
Yes! They could decide how much each of us needs, and take from the wasteful rich and give to the deserving poor. It couldn't take long before total utopia broke out ;-)
I don't think the GLOBE should be paying this guy $23 per column
As El Rushbo has suggested,why not make the"minimum wage"that someone can be paid $100,000?That way we could employ more people at Un-Employment offices!
We're starting to fear they make succeed with their understanding of SHeeple :o(.
We're starting to fear they make succeed with their understanding of SHeeple :o(.
Good read from Mr. Hubbard. Thanks for sharing it!
The Politburo, of course, Tovarish!!

"Wasteful Rich", ya know for once Derrick Jackson might just have a point.

Ha! Shooting fish in a barrel, today? Lemme guess - - this "Derrick Z" is a failed rap star?
Good job, and thanks for the ping.
Regards,
LH
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.