Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HBO To Air Goldwater Granddaughter's Bio Film -- Attacking Religious Right
newsbusters.org ^ | Aug 4 06 | Tim Graham

Posted on 08/04/2006 12:59:47 PM PDT by churchillbuff

Variety reviewer Robert Koehler (formerly of the L.A. Times) recently reviewed a new documentary titled "Mr. Conservative: Goldwater on Goldwater." The main driver behind the project is his granddaughter, C.C. Goldwater, and it's scheduled to air on HBO on September 18. The list of interviewees underlines it's not a big right-wing project: it includes Walter Cronkite, Ted Kennedy, Al Franken, Helen Thomas, James Carville, Bob Schieffer, Andy Rooney, Julian Bond, Ben Bradlee and Sally Quinn, John Dean, and erstwhile Goldwater Girl Hillary Rodham Clinton. A few righties appear (Richard Viguerie, George Will) and some more centrist GOP types do, too (John Warner, Sandra Day O'Connor).

Here's how Koehler sums the film up: "Pic reflects on a contempo religious GOP right wing that would have profoundly alienated Goldwater, who rarely brought God into his politics."

Koehler extolled the film for showing "some of the contradictions of Goldwater, who opposed expansion of civil rights for African-Americans in the '60s and -- as various family anecdotes illustrate -- was tolerant toward gays and lesbians as well as female reproductive rights. (Daughter Joanne tells of her abortion as a young woman, and gay grandson Ty speaks warmly of him.)"

At first, Koehler seems unhappy there's not enough angst toward the religious right: "Even with an impressive roster of journos and political sharpies (including Hillary Clinton, who was a Goldwater Girl in '64 and a devout conservative in her teens), little is made of libertarian Goldwater's differences with the right-wing Christian movement that swept into the GOP in the 1980s. John Dean, whose new book, 'Conservatives Without Conscience,' began as a collaboration with longtime friend Goldwater, articulates best how Goldwater's straight-talking politics was rejected by his Bush-era party."

But he later concludes: "Response to the pic from GOP pundits and opinionmakers will provide a telling indicator of the current political climate. Walter Cronkite overstates the case that the older Goldwater turned liberal, while George Will is more on point, noting that what changed wasn't Goldwater but the GOP's extreme shift toward moralistic conservatism."

It will be interesting to hear if that's exactly how it sounds out of the mouth of Will.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ac; auh2o; christianbashing; dnctalkingpoints; documentary; goldwater; hbo; indoctrination; liberalbigot; liberalmedia; moviereview; mrconservative; persecution; propaganda; rattricks; religion; religiousintolerance; religiousright; religiousrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: jla

I could have easily included many of the founders, but chose Washington because he is the rock from which this nation was built (and personally very conservative) and little James because he was MOST responsible for the drafting of the constitution.

Thomas was more egalitarian and libertarian, and deserves much credit in history. However, I think Ben Franklin was the wisest of the bunch.


21 posted on 08/04/2006 1:52:06 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Quix

What the hell does that mean?


22 posted on 08/04/2006 1:52:38 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No Alexander Hamilton, the greatest man of his generation after Washington?


23 posted on 08/04/2006 1:54:03 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jla

Uh, probably because the more you learn of Jefferson the less admirable he appears. He was the most overrated of American presidents.


24 posted on 08/04/2006 1:55:08 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Surely you jest!


25 posted on 08/04/2006 1:55:22 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Maybe it just means that though I strongly supported his run for President and read his book . . .

given all I've heard and seen in AZ over the years about him and his family etc.

I wouldn't exactly list him as my most trustworthy friends. I also doubt he was the kind of conservative I'd have a lot of faith in. I think he was too compromised by too many big people . . . not all of them all that kosher in a list of ways.

Just my opinion.


26 posted on 08/04/2006 1:57:20 PM PDT by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

How did Teddy Roosevelt get on the list?

The man was a progressive.

I wouldn't have put Jesse Helms on an all time list, either... Although the Senate could certainly use him now. Anyway, good list!


27 posted on 08/04/2006 1:58:25 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Thanks!


28 posted on 08/04/2006 1:58:53 PM PDT by AdvisorB (For a terrorist bodycount in hamistan, let the smoke clear then count the ears and divide by 2.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jla

Not at all. Jefferson was an underhanded sneak and a disaster as President. His only notable achievements were having Louisiana handed to him (he didn't believe its purchase was constitutional) and the Lewis and Clark expendition. Jefferson was the era's greatest rhetoritician but was clueless about the Constitution. Thank God he was out of the country during its writing and ratification as I am sure he would have opposed it.

If there was a bigger hypocrit in American history I haven't heard of him.


29 posted on 08/04/2006 1:59:13 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
You've posted lies about Mr. J here before.
I'll not entertain your malicious misrepresentations of this great American and personification of liberty.
30 posted on 08/04/2006 2:03:56 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jla

I have never posted a lie about anyone Jefferson included.
Any inaccuracies I will correct when they are pointed out. Point some out.


31 posted on 08/04/2006 2:09:55 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: x
Thank you!

That article is so informative!

I'm not surprised George Will is in this "documentary"--- the guy is a federalist but not really a conservative; nor do I think he ever has been the latter.
32 posted on 08/04/2006 2:21:47 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

We ought to celebrate Thomas Jefferson for his many contributions to human liberty and Aaron Burr for his marksmanship in liberty's cause.


33 posted on 08/04/2006 2:38:00 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mjolnir

Teddy was a man's man. A conservationist, big game hunter, and yes, a conservative. He had soem "progressisve" ideas, but the word progressive back then did NOT mean left wing. He was a FRIM believer in American exceptionalism. In fact, he embodied it, to a large degree.


34 posted on 08/04/2006 2:47:23 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

As long as its understood that Hamilton was not of Franklin's generation.


35 posted on 08/04/2006 2:51:47 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff; All
“I find that America is fundamentally a Conservative nation. The preponderant judgment of the American people, especially of the young people, is that the radical, or Liberal, approach has not worked and is not working. They yearn for a return to Conservative principles.” – Barry Goldwater, The Conscience Of A Conservative, 1960.

“Conservatism, we are told, is out-of-date. The charge is preposterous and we ought boldly to say so. The laws of God, and of nature, have no dateline. The principles on which the Conservative political position is based have been established by a process that has nothing to do with the social, economic and political landscape that changes from decade to decade and from century to century. These principles are derived from the nature of man, and from the truths that God has revealed about His creation. Circumstances do change. So do the problems that are shaped by circumstances. But the principles that govern the solution of the problems do not. To suggest that the Conservative philosophy is out of date is akin to saying that the Golden Rule, or the Ten Commandments or Aristotle's Politics are out of date. The Conservative approach is nothing more or less than an attempt to apply the wisdom and experience and the revealed truths of the past to the problems of today.” – Barry Goldwater, The Conscience Of A Conservative, 1960.

Barry Goldwater, The Conscience Of A Conservative.

36 posted on 08/04/2006 2:55:50 PM PDT by PsyOp (Any man can make a mistake; only a liberal keeps making the same one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Barry Goldwater was a libertarian, western-state, "whorehouse" conservative who never had much use for religion other than to get votes. I believe he also procured an abortion for a female relative back in the Fifties.


37 posted on 08/04/2006 3:57:35 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Nachamu, nachamu, `ammi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
"I could swear that, when running for president, Goldwater advocated an amendment to let prayer back into public schools. I remember seeing a Goldwater pamphlet that quoted the Bible, "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.'"

'Ashrei ha`am 'asher bachar-bam; 'ashrei ha`am sheHaShem 'Eloqayv!

38 posted on 08/04/2006 4:00:18 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Nachamu, nachamu, `ammi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
A good counterbalance would be to show that past liberal icons such as Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman held socially conservative views. Could you imagine what Truman would have to say about homosexual marriage were he alive today? You could also highlight the positions of current day liberals earlier in their careers. Fore example, when Jesse Jackson, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and Dick Gephardt entered public life, they were opponents of abortion.

Liberalism regards human history as a "budding rose unfolding;" it develops teleologically until it reaches perfection (the "omega point") and then magically stops. And this programming took place without a Creator; in fact, the unfolding universe itself seems to be regarded as the creator.

Anyway, according to liberals, a "moderate," "centerist," "decent" person is one who keeps up with the unfolding of history (from the Tennessee Valley Authority to "gay rights") and a "dangerous radical" is a person who maintains his original position instead of changing with the times.

39 posted on 08/04/2006 4:06:17 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Nachamu, nachamu, `ammi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Was he a man's man?

Definitely-- Teddy was that and more, he was an exceptional painter, poet, historian, one could go on and on.

He was, as you say, an exceptional man who believed in the exceptionalism of America...

But he was NOT a conservative.

He believed in American exceptionalism, yes, but not in the wisdom of the Founders, or in the free market.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1660615/posts

His conservationism, while moderate and wise compared to the enviro-whacos of today, was also largely misguided, NOT because Roosevelt did not know hopw to conserve nature-- he did-- but because in grabbing land for the government to control, he assumed such wilderness areas would be managed in the future by men who knew as much about them as he did, a hope that was to be disappointed in his own lifetime: http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-news/1551707/posts

TR famously urged

"far more active governmental interference with social and economic conditions in this country"

Those aren't the words of a conservative.


40 posted on 08/04/2006 4:12:03 PM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson