To: JeanS
Surprised they have to pay for ads in Connecticut to run against Republicans.
Most media there will give them extra bang for their buck with editorials and news coverage favorable to any librat.
5 posted on
08/02/2006 2:47:01 PM PDT by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: N. Theknow
Surprised they have to pay for ads in Connecticut to run against Republicans.Don't dis Connecticut -- it has a RINO governor and 3/5 of its members of congress are RINOs. Compare that to Massachusetts, where 10/10 congresscritters are RATS.
12 posted on
08/02/2006 3:00:34 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: N. Theknow
Not just CT but they are also wasting money in Vermont? Seriously? I'd be happier if they spent the entire $51M in Vermont. If a state will vote for a socialist, there is no amount of TV advertising which is going to turn it less blue.
17 posted on
08/02/2006 3:13:40 PM PDT by
bpjam
(Remember our fallen Marines from Beirut. Hezbollah deserves no peace.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson