To: N. Theknow
Surprised they have to pay for ads in Connecticut to run against Republicans.Don't dis Connecticut -- it has a RINO governor and 3/5 of its members of congress are RINOs. Compare that to Massachusetts, where 10/10 congresscritters are RATS.
12 posted on
08/02/2006 3:00:34 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
Don't dis Connecticut -- it has a RINO governor and 3/5 of its members of congress are RINOs. Compare that to Massachusetts, where 10/10 congresscritters are RATS. Lived there for 25 years. My post was referring to them spending money in CT where liberal media is THE norm. They don't have to spend money in Mass.
14 posted on
08/02/2006 3:04:25 PM PDT by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: Alter Kaker
Spending success in CT will depend on how next week's primary turns out. If Lieberman runs as an independent, it could be a high turnout election that wouldn't necessarily favor any GOP canddiate except in the safest of Districts.
Can I assume CT is like so many other states where outside the big cities the counties are red ?
16 posted on
08/02/2006 3:08:05 PM PDT by
EDINVA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson