Posted on 08/01/2006 8:10:14 AM PDT by JSedreporter
Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., has a simple answer to the people who say its not possible to deport nearly twenty million illegal aliens as a means of resolving the immigration problem: “Yes, you can!”
As one of four speakers at Accuracy in Academia's Conservative University forum on immigration, Tancredo spoke about the challenges and political implications associated with addressing the hot topic of immigration reform. Having the role of Chairman of the bipartisan House Immigration Reform Caucus provides him with the status as a political expert on the subject.
Speaking to the difficulties of establishing immigration reform laws, Rep. Tancredo acknowledged that many Americans view borders as anachronistic and relayed their message: “Why would we be building walls on the border when, in fact, borders are going to become meaningless?” Because there exists a hope for borders to become obsolete in favor of a free trade market region similar to the European Union, Rep. Tancredo admitted, “These issues… are preventing us from doing what we need to do about borders.”
Seeing this matter as one of the utmost importance for the 2006 midterm election cycle, Rep. Tancredo recognized that many of his fellow Republicans are hesitant to support immigration reform legislation for fear of alienating potential voters, especially those in the Hispanic community. To that end, he discussed the passage of Arizona Proposition 200 in 2004, which requires proof of citizenship before individuals in the state can receive social benefits or register to vote, and the fact that it received 47% of the Hispanic vote at the ballot.
“We will not lose the election, we will not lose Hispanic votes, if we push for secure borders, a common language, and the idea of holding us together as a nation,” Rep. Tancredo said to nay-saying Republicans. He then went on to question whether his Grand Old Party had the political will to push an immigration reform bill through Congress before the election: “Do we have the actual nerve?”
Representative Tancredo is a man with ideas and a man with answers. For every scenario that poses as an obstacle to immigration reform, he presented a solution. To the question of deporting twenty million people, he simply offered, “Yes you can, the answer is yes!”
He even proposed an idea that is simple in its objective: “Stop giving [illegal immigrants] jobs.” Rehashing the fact that providing jobs to people who are not legally in this country is illegal, he quipped, “So I’ve got another bold radical idea for us – Enforce the law!” In that way, the government would not need to expend resources on deporting these immigrants, but rather these people would willingly return home when faced with the prospect of no economic opportunities for them here.
Recognizing that a primary step to managing this issue is better law enforcement, Rep. Tancredo noted, “If you don’t like the law, you change the law, but you don’t keep ignoring the law.”
Ending his speech on a high note, Tancredo left his captivated audience, but not before offering a job to this standing-room only crowd and answering a barrage of questions about his formative opinions.
Jacqueline Merzer is an intern at Accuracy in Media, Accuracy in Academia's parent group.
" == He even proposed an idea that is simple in its objective: “Stop giving [illegal immigrants] jobs.” Rehashing the fact that providing jobs to people who are not legally in this country is illegal, he quipped, “So I’ve got another bold radical idea for us – Enforce the law!” == "
While technology will not SOLVE the problem, it certainly can be a large part of the solution. Centralized employment verification via SSN/TIN, matched against name, birthdate, previous employer, and (for aliens) status, would trigger an attrition process that would reduce the problem to a manageable size within a couple of years.
And we don't have to re-invent the wheel, just expand a pilot program already in operation.
ANY credential can be counterfeited, so a central database is the only workable solution. A limited availability, optional program already exists that could be expanded and made mandatory, called the "basic pilot" part of the "Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE)" Program - http://www.uscis.gov/text/services/SAVE.htm .
This is a program to provide verification of employment eligibility documents, that is currently limited and voluntary. It checks and matches the SSN/ITIN, name, birthdate, and sex, and verifies the valid issuance of other documents. It needs to be expanded and made mandatory, to keep employers from excusing themselves from compliance.
It does seem somewhat "big brotherish," but the information is already required by law, collected, and available. You MUST present your SS CARD (not just the number) to be hired, and you must complete an I-9. Employers must report this information quarterly anyway for taxes, so more frequent reporting and reconcilation would not be difficult.
Returning responsibility for verifying documents to the government that issued them will take that responsibility - and the excuse for non-compliance - away from employers.
"He then went on to question whether his Grand Old Party had the political will to push an immigration reform bill through Congress before the election: 'Do we have the actual nerve?'"
Uh, no. It's quite obvious the GOP does NOT have the will to push a reform bill short of amnesty through Congress.
I don't think it'd solve the problem at all. For one, the Federal government has proven time and time again that it can't manage records to save anyone's life. Instead of reducing the problem, I think you'd see that more illegals simply bypass the SSN/ITIN portion of the employment process, and merely work for cash (something I'd argue they're already doing, largely).
I think a more sensible solution would be to eliminate the use of SSN numbers as identification, combined with a simplification of the Federal tax system to such a degree that it's more easily verifiable, and less easy to scam.
Of course, identity fraud should continue to be punished to the maximum extent allowable...
The Nerve Of Unwashed Voters
E.J. Dionne writes, “Elections Interfering w/ Immigration Reform.”
I can see how a liberal democrat is disturbed that voters are influencing their best laid plans.
Kind of like the Editorial Board of the Orlando Sentinal saying that “House immigration hearings hurt chances for compromise with the Senate.” Of course they do, because voters will be informed!!!!
-- Oak Leaf
ping
“If you don’t like the law, you change the law, but you don’t keep ignoring the law.”
Yep.
"I think you'd see that more illegals simply bypass the SSN/ITIN portion of the employment process, and merely work for cash (something I'd argue they're already doing, largely)."
That's why you go after employers. The ones paying cash have to get that cash somewhere, they are either laundering illegal money or withdrawing large sums from the bank which is a red flag and makes them liable for prison terms and fines much larger than just hiring illegals.
It's a proven strategy.
BTTT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.