Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Labor Unions Fight Ban On Gay Marriage
WFRV.COM ^ | 31 JULY 2006 | AP

Posted on 07/31/2006 4:19:38 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

(AP) MADISON -- Labor unions are joining forces to fight a proposed ban on gay marriage and civil unions in what could become a powerful force in the Nov. 7 referendum.

The groups, representing employees ranging from teachers to prison workers, say they are worried the amendment will take away their ability to bargain for benefits such as health insurance for the domestic partners of gay and straight employees.

They are making donations, organizing volunteers and educating their members as part of their attempts to make Wisconsin the first state to defeat a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

AFSCME, which represents 44,000 public service and health care workers in Wisconsin, became the latest to join the cause on Monday with a strong denunciation of the ban from its political arm and a vow to get its message out.

The unions are underscoring the main argument made by the ban's critics: that it is not about gay marriage, which is already illegal in Wisconsin, but that it threatens a range of legal protections for all unmarried couples. Others say those fears are overblown.

Brian Weeks, director of AFSCME's political arm, called the amendment "an attack on labor unions' collective bargaining rights." He said the group's locals representing public employees for the city of Madison and Dane County stand to lose benefits if the amendment passes. "Backers of this ban are trying to break deals and take away rights and protections that working people have earned through good-faith negotiations," Weeks said.

That contention is hotly disputed by amendment supporters, who say gay rights activists are vastly distorting the potential impact to shift the terms of the debate.

The amendment would declare that marriage is between one man and one woman and that unmarried individuals cannot be granted a legal status similar to marriage such as civil unions pioneered by Vermont. "It's just inflammatory rhetoric," said Julaine Appling, president of Vote Yes For Marriage. "This amendment isn't going to change benefit structures that exist ... It's about whether or not we are going to live with a redefinition of marriage as something other than between a man and a woman."

She also downplayed the significance of the unions' positions, saying they do not speak for all of their members.

But Mike Tate, campaign manager of Fair Wisconsin, which is fighting the ban, said labor unions would help spread the group's message that the amendment could have far-reaching effects. "They are going to be focused on communicating to their members about why this is bad for Wisconsin, work with us on our door knocking and canvassing and some have donated to the campaign already," he said. "I think that labor unions are a really critical part of the coalition."

The group's latest campaign filing shows the Wisconsin Education Association Council, the state's largest teachers' union, gave $25,000 while AFT-Wisconsin, another public employees' union, donated $5,000. The Milwaukee branch of Communication Workers of America gave $1,000.

WEAC President Stan Johnson said the group made its donation after its membership voted in May to oppose the amendment. He said it will be up to local unions across the state to determine whether to get involved. "Members have an opportunity to be involved in this," he said. "Some will and some won't."

Cathy Rought, spokeswoman for 17,000-member AFT-Wisconsin, said the amendment threatens benefits enjoyed by some of technical college faculty and staff it represents. Other employees would not be able to bargain for similar benefits in the future, she said. "We will be collaborating to go door to door and talk to people about the importance of defeating the amendment," she said. "Most people, once they understand this is not an issue about being gay or being straight and that it's an access to health care question, they oppose this."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Philosophy; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: afscme; biglabor; elections; homosexualagenda; localwinews; perverts; pervertspervert; prevertperverts; unions

1 posted on 07/31/2006 4:19:38 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Wonder what the rank & file union members say about "gay marriage"?


2 posted on 07/31/2006 4:22:02 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Looking at their two photos, and going on the premise that the ugliest candidate always loses, Bachmann wins this easily.


3 posted on 07/31/2006 4:25:59 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You want the benefits, stop shacking up with a sex partner and work on getting a family together. Sounds cold, but the reason why they offer benefits to family members is because it makes the worker more efficient. They have less to worry about, and general work better for it.

Besides, what company really wants to offer benefits to domestic partners? Just keeping up with 'partner' changes would drive a human resource department nuts. Oh, that's right, I forget - most of these 'benefits' are supposed to come from the state - these are state employees, after all. Don't like what's offered, get a job somewhere else so someone can have your job.
4 posted on 07/31/2006 4:28:41 PM PDT by kingu (Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Well said.


5 posted on 07/31/2006 4:37:30 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

didn't half of union members vote Republican?? Guess where their dues went?


6 posted on 07/31/2006 5:03:15 PM PDT by GeronL (http://www.mises.org/story/1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu
"Oh, that's right, I forget - most of these 'benefits' are supposed to come from the state - these are state employees,"

The funds come from, what a shocker, the TAXPAYER pays for sex deviates (again).

7 posted on 07/31/2006 5:03:54 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
If they want to waste their money on a losing cause, let's just say they've been warned. Gay marriage does not exactly have a perfect batting average in terms of political victories in the real world. The Left keeps on trying on the theory that this time they just might succeed. Where have we heard that before?

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

8 posted on 07/31/2006 5:09:26 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Diana in Wisconsin

Labor Unions haven't represented the real interests of their rank and file for many, many years. But now, they've stopped even pretending to.


9 posted on 08/01/2006 5:56:22 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson