Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Complete text: Secretary Rice makes no mention of Hezbullah's using human shields
IMRA ^ | 7-30-06

Posted on 07/30/2006 9:19:49 AM PDT by SJackson

Call for opponents of terror to protest Rice] Complete text:Secretary Ricemakes no mention of Hezbullah's using human shields in remarks after Qana bombing

[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA: Now is the time for all friends of freedom and opponents of terror to make their voice heard in Washington in strong protest of the position voiced by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that encourages terrorists around the world to use human shields. The closest she comes to a reference is: "We also have to realize that we cannot have a circumstance in which there is a return to the status quo ante, in which there is a zone in Southern Lebanon in which a terrorist can violate the Blue Line, and create the kind of devastating circumstances that we see today." - Hardly a sound bite condemning Hizbullah!

This is no time for political/party considerations.

It is extremely important that all friends of freedom and opponents of terror let President Bush and their representatives in Congress know that they expect the United States of America to take a clear and vocal stand against those who exploit human shields to protect their forces as they launch attacks against civilian targets.

Secretary Rice's reward to Hizbullah cannot and must not be accepted.

It is critical that a clear voice be heard from Washington correcting this incredible error in judgment.

Today human shields protect Hizbullah rocket launching teams.

Tomorrow America and the rest of the free world will find itself facing the same terror method of operation.

In the midst of what is already a worldwide battle against terror, Secretary Rice's words must not be America's final word on the matter.] =============

Briefing on Efforts To Stop Violence in Lebanon Secretary Condoleezza Rice Jerusalem July 30, 2006 www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/69720.htm

SECRETARY RICE: Good afternoon. I am deeply saddened by the terrible loss of innocent life in the bombing in Lebanon this morning. The people of Lebanon have the deepest sympathies of President Bush, the people of the United States and my own heartfelt condolences. Our prayers go out to all the victims and their families.

I first learned of this tragic loss of life as I was meeting with the Israeli Defense Minister this morning and once again I was reiterating our strong concern about the impact of Israeli military operations on innocent civilians during crisis.

We are working very hard to try to stop the violence. Too many innocent people - Lebanese and Israeli - have suffered. Too many people have lost their lives; too many families are homeless and too many children have been killed, injured, are living in fear for their lives.

The circumstances are very difficult and emotions are understandably running high on all sides. I just spoke by telephone with Prime Minister Siniora and conveyed my condolences personally to him, to the people of Lebanon.

In the wake of the tragedy that the people and the government of Lebanon are dealing with today, I decided to postpone my discussions in Beirut. In any case, my work today is here. I will continue to meet with Israeli officials as we work to put in place the elements necessary to bring an end to this conflict.

We are making real progress on a political framework and believe the parties are coming together on this aspect. We are also pushing for an urgent end to the current hostilities. But the views of the parties on how to achieve this are different. The work we do here will make it possible for the United Nations Security Council to take decisive action for a cease-fire as soon as possible.

Now I am happy to take questions. Andrea.

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, how upset are you that Israel proceeded with this action today while you were here on your way to Beirut? Have they not scuttled the diplomacy and debate beyond the loss of life? Isn't this an unacceptable action in the midst of the most sensitive time in the diplomacy?

SECRETARY RICE: Andrea, I fully understand and fully understood when I came here that I am working on this issue in the midst of ongoing military operations. I am quite aware that there are many dangers associated with military operations. I might note that there are, of course, rocket attacks continuing against Israel, as well. So, I recognize that this was not a situation in which there was already a cease-fire. I fully understand that. My job is to come here and to do what I have been doing: to work very urgently to help on the humanitarian side, to represent our views to the Israelis on what needs to be done on the humanitarian side - we had long discussions about that this morning - to talk about the impact that this is having on civilians. Most importantly, to try to work toward political arrangements that the Security Council can act on the basis of - to have a cease-fire that is going to be enduring.

I was really struck and in fact saddened by the references to the fact that it is very near this area that this happened in 1996. It just reminds us how fragile cease-fires are in this part of the world and it reminds us that we have to try and do our work well so that there will not be more and more and more incidents over many and many and many more years. That's why we are working so hard on the political framework. But I knew precisely what the circumstances were when I came.

QUESTION: The Prime Minister of Lebanon has said that he does not want to hold talks with you until there is a cease-fire. Does that change your thinking and planning? And secondly, you have told us repeatedly that you have mentioned your concern about this striking on civilian targets in Lebanon. Are you disappointed that the Israelis have not listened?

SECRETARY RICE: I am certainly going to continue to press the case that there be extraordinary care taken during military operations to avoid civilian casualties. I think we all recognize that this kind of warfare is extremely difficult, because in fact it is warfare within - situations within territory in which civilians are residing. It is extremely difficult. And it unfortunately has awful consequences sometimes, and these are awful consequences.

I spoke with Prime Minster Siniora, and what he said to me was that he was feeling extremely depressed and -depressed is not quite the right word - he was feeling very emotional about what had happened to his people. I fully understand that-fully understand that. But I want you to understand something too: I called him and told him that I was not coming today, because I felt very strongly that my work toward a cease-fire is really here, today.

QUESTION: What does that mean?

SECRETARY RICE: It means I have work to do here, on the political arrangements, and on how we get a security environment in Southern Lebanon that will permit a sustainable cease-fire. And I have work to do here on that issue.

QUESTION: Who is arguing against an immediate cease-fire? (Inaudible.)

SECRETARY RICE: I think it's time to get to a cease-fire. We actually have to try and put one in place. I've made the point and I made the point in Rome that we want a cease-fire as soon as possible. I would have wanted to have a cease-fire yesterday, if possible. But the parties have to agree to a cease-fire, and there have to be certain conditions in place. Any cease-fire has to have circumstances that are going to be acceptable to the parties.

We also have to realize that we cannot have a circumstance in which there is a return to the status quo ante, in which there is a zone in Southern Lebanon in which a terrorist can violate the Blue Line, and create the kind of devastating circumstances that we see today. And we would be not very responsible if we were not attending to those circumstances as well as working as urgently and as quickly as we can to get the fighting stopped.

QUESTION: Some of your critics say that you are not putting enough pressure on Israel and you bear some of the responsibility for what is happening. What is your response to that? And also have you spoken to Prime Minister Olmert and what was your message?

SECRETARY RICE: First of all, the United States has been working harder, and harder and harder. I would put our efforts beside anyone's efforts to deal with the current situation, to have a way to address the humanitarian concerns, to have a way to address the inevitable problems of warfare in which civilians get caught up. I would remind that it is because the United States pressed and worked with Israel to get the airport open so that humanitarian flights could get in that that got done. It is because the United States pressed for humanitarian corridors, that that got done. The Israelis don't want to see a humanitarian crisis, so we have been really pressing that case. It is also the case that I am here, as Andrea noted, in pretty difficult and dicey circumstances, because I do believe that it is best to try to address these issues face-to-face with the parties, and to see what we can achieve.

Now, I think the Security Council will take this up. We want the Security Council to take it up soon, and we want the Security Council to take it up with as much concrete progress toward a real cease-fire, as is humanly possible by the time that that meeting takes place. So, I will continue to work, and work and work, that is what we can do. If there is any way humanly, to accelerate our efforts, I would do it. But we are already doing really what is of the human limitation to try to get to an end of this conflict.

Thank you.

QUESTION: Prime Minister Olmert?

SECRRETARY RICE: I have not spoken with the Prime Minister, I was speaking with the Defense Minister when this happened. I understand that there is an Israeli Cabinet meeting, and I will be speaking with the Prime Minister immediately after that Cabinet meeting.

Thank you.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2006 9:19:50 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.

also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

BREAKING: FOX reporting IDF has video proving Qana building had launchers

If the Fox report is correct, this is an important omission, which encourages the terrorists. Even if one ignores Israel, the impact on the people we're fighting in Iraq should be considered.

2 posted on 07/30/2006 9:22:48 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I noticed it. There was no condemnation from the Secretary of Hezbollah's reprehensible practice of using Lebanese civilians as human shields. The very least Secretary Rice could have said is that this practice is wrong and Israel was not to blame for those deaths, the sole responsibility of which rests with Hezbollah that has converted Lebanese towns and villages into killing fields. We must protest this error in judgment and Hezbollah must not escape the consequences of its breaking every law known to man and God alike.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

3 posted on 07/30/2006 9:28:23 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE

ping


4 posted on 07/30/2006 9:28:30 AM PDT by zip (((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Sometimes it seems to me that this admin as a whole seems unwilling or unable to bring up certain truths about the enemy. This is one occasion; the WMD is another. Frustating, and perhaps counterproductive--even if they think it is the high road.


5 posted on 07/30/2006 9:31:35 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I noticed it. There was no condemnation from the Secretary of Hezbollah's reprehensible practice of using Lebanese civilians as human shields. The very least Secretary Rice could have said is that this practice is wrong and Israel was not to blame for those deaths, the sole responsibility of which rests with Hezbollah that has converted Lebanese towns and villages into killing fields.

A fair person would state that, if only to delegitimize their use against Americans in Iraq.

6 posted on 07/30/2006 9:32:09 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
There was no condemnation from the Secretary of Hezbollah's reprehensible practice of using Lebanese civilians as human shields.

Careful now. You'll have the 'Condi for President' or 'Condi for Saint' people swooping down on you, pecking like a buzzard on roadkill.

7 posted on 07/30/2006 9:32:58 AM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Look, we are trying to give the IDF time.

We have to show sympathy for the dead Lebanese today, while the IDF produces the evidence of Hezzie missile perfidy.

Give Condi a break, will you? She is dealing with an Israeli Government that is pursuing a war strategy of half-measures. Try to remember that the IDF is stuck with Olmert as PM, not Sharon.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

8 posted on 07/30/2006 9:33:55 AM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

We must establish a simple foundation here before getting too far ahead of ourselves. Hezbollah are the criminals here. It is Israel that is the aggrieved party. All the Qanas in the world and all the diplomatic double-talk Rice can muster won't change that. No justice, no peace!


9 posted on 07/30/2006 9:38:43 AM PDT by claudiustg (dou•ble•think ('d&-b&l-"thi[ng]k), noun, 1949: a simultaneous belief in two contradictory ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
We also have to realize that we cannot have a circumstance in which there is a return to the status quo ante, in which there is a zone in Southern Lebanon in which a terrorist can violate the Blue Line,

It sounds like Rice and the Israelis are discussing the size and boundaries of a buffer zone, and the make-up of forces that will police the buffer zone.

That sounds like they have backed off the original requirement that Hezbollah disarm. If so, its a mistake, because it guarantees that this war will re-ignite, and next time will be tougher than this time. The arabs take a long view; they are observing what worked, what didn't work, and they will adjust accordingly.

Any "cease-fire" that leaves Hezbollah in place will guarantee that war continues.

Olmert seems to have set for himself very modest goals. Rice seems to be giving him time to meet those goals, Israel won't be stopped until the Nato force is identified. But while a buffer zone is necessary, it is insufficient. Syria and Iran are the ultimate authors of this war, and they are the ultimate authors of the insurgency we face in Iraq. I would like to think we are putting in place a pause so we can go after the source of the problem, but I don't see it. I see a pause so we can get past the elections in November, which are very important, but hardly a strategy for a reformed middle east.

10 posted on 07/30/2006 9:39:14 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbrown; goldstategop

I couldn't care less if she's ever President.

I support the President's policy, which is exactly the right one and has been clearly spelled out.

I have no problem with what she said. This is diplospeak. But she is absolutely firm in her words of blaming the entire thing on Hezbollah attacking Israel from Lebanese territory being the reason all of this has happened, and that more than a mere ceasefire is absolutely to be insisted upon.

Israel says it has proof of firing coming from near the building. The issue of human shields is out there and will stay out there.

I will let the whole thing play out and trust the President and Condi unless they go back on their basic policy.


11 posted on 07/30/2006 9:43:03 AM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marron
That sounds like they have backed off the original requirement that Hezbollah disarm. If so, its a mistake, because it guarantees that this war will re-ignite, and next time will be tougher than this time. The arabs take a long view; they are observing what worked, what didn't work, and they will adjust accordingly....Any "cease-fire" that leaves Hezbollah in place will guarantee that war continues.

You're right. I can't imagine a force, other than a restructured, retrained Lebanese Army that will enforce order. I don't want to see US or British troops there, it's a losing proposition. The best solution would be for Israel to stay till the Lebanese Army was capable and willing to stand up, but I doubt that will happen.

12 posted on 07/30/2006 9:43:08 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
On the face of it Madam Secretary has lost her mind. The terrorists have been bombing Israel for about 50 years now.
This time the Hizzies have gone to far and are getting what they deserve for it. It appears that Sec. Rice thinks that a ceasefire is the answer, it is not. They will only rearm and try it again and again. There is a time when dedicated people refuse to learn from history.
13 posted on 07/30/2006 9:49:30 AM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
The issue of human shields is out there and will stay out there.

Not if our SOS doesn't bring it up in news conferences and keep hammering them on it. They could say, 'It's not true or America's SOS would have said something.'

These terrorist are PR geniuses. We need to be as well.

14 posted on 07/30/2006 9:52:55 AM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
It appears that Sec. Rice thinks that a ceasefire is the answer, it is not.

Amen, it is not. Time to annihilate them or be prepared to do it all over again...in perpetuity. Hell, like you said, it's already been 50 years.

15 posted on 07/30/2006 9:59:31 AM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Why can't the Bush admin just keep its freakin' mouth shut for a change? I have never seen such spineless pandering to the media and to the world. Just keep out of it. But no, they are so worried because we support the right of Israel to exist....rotten, stinking politics.


16 posted on 07/30/2006 10:00:47 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Ms Rice may be a highly intelligent woman, with a great future in politics, but she is a failure as a Sec of State. As others have said before me, we need someone with fire in their eyes, ice in their veins, fluent in ME language(s) and testicles. She fails in at least two of the categories.


17 posted on 07/30/2006 10:08:25 AM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ANGGAPO
There are some ideas that are so outlandish, that only a scholar could believe them...........one of those is that with the proper wording in a document, or giving enough land or food or aid will bring peace. Send a clear message to Israel completely in the open, do as you see fit.
18 posted on 07/30/2006 10:11:33 AM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Wait a minute! She's not saying anything about terrorists using human shields. That fact needs to be reiterated time and time again to get the fact home that these murdering terrorists aren't nice people and don't deserve to live. Rice is playing right into the islamic hands. Sheesh!


19 posted on 07/30/2006 10:13:56 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Rice is doing what all mediators do...pressure the parties. Unfortunately, its easier to pressure the sane and rational. This is why Israel must be resolute even if it means showing what others perceive as barbarism and otherwise scare the living piss out of the world. So long as others perceive her to be more likely to give in then that's who they'll pressure. Scorched earth and unconditional surrender is the only way.

GINGRICH FOR PRESIDENT


20 posted on 07/30/2006 10:15:02 AM PDT by HockeyPop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson