Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keeping the trust is the first order (Minutemen-Simcox)
Jewish World Review ^ | July 28, 2006 | Wesley Pruden

Posted on 07/28/2006 3:05:06 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182

The first thing a Minuteman has to learn is to keep his powder dry. The bigger the powder magazine, the bigger the risk of getting it all wet.

This is the lesson that Chris Simcox, the president of the volunteers on the border, who have almost single-handedly aroused the nation's conscience about the tide of illegal immigration, seems to have missed in basic training.

The "powder" is the hundreds of thousands of dollars that Americans have contributed to the Minutemen, who have been exceedingly helpful to the U.S. Border Patrol. The careful, rigorous reporting of Jerry Seper in The Washington Times reveals that the Minutemen management has not made its records of fundraising and finances public in more than a year, raising the hackles and suspicions of several top Simcox aides. Some of them have resigned, protesting the loose management of the money...."[snip]

"... All the more reason that Chris Simcox and his lieutenants must account for the money and explain what the Declaration Alliance, the grandly named political public-relations firm in Herndon, has done with the money it has collected and disbursed in the name of the Minutemen. The Declaration Alliance is the creation of Alan Keyes, the smooth-talking conservative activist and sometime pol, and is meant to provide mass mailings, public relations and "a fully accredited and independent audit." So far no one in the Minutemen management has said how much has been paid to the Declaration Alliance, and what the Minutemen got for the money...."

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrantlist; immigration; minuteman; minutemen; mmp; pruden; simcox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-328 next last
To: Texasforever

$128k for camping out is a pretty good deal.


61 posted on 07/28/2006 7:20:42 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles

You are making even less sense than usual. Are you high?


62 posted on 07/28/2006 7:21:31 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

The states dont pay for it. The Fed gov does. All records on individuals are kept in the DoD repository in St Louis.

If the states were funding the Guard, there would be an oath of allegiance to the state.

The oath taken by the NG folks is the same as the Active Duty; they are under the UCMJ in addition to local law jurisdiction while on drills.


63 posted on 07/28/2006 7:28:36 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

64 posted on 07/28/2006 7:28:56 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles
If the states were funding the Guard, there would be an oath of allegiance to the state.

Oh baloney. You were never in the NG or you wouldn't be posting this crap. Yes, when the feds nationalize the NG for out of state missions they reimburse the states for the extra costs. That is what delayed the California mobilization. The Arnie didn't like the money offered to cover the cost.

65 posted on 07/28/2006 7:32:18 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

You are pretty slow for a friday tex.

The NG is under OPCON by the states. They are under TACON by the feds.

The feds/president ask to use the NG, a formality, to deploy to Iraq, an exercise, the border etc.

TACON (tactical control of an operational commander) takes over and they belong to the theater commander, not the state, not funded by the state.


The State does fund the NG if its a deployment above the one weekend a month 2 weeks a year deployment; Fires, Hurricanes, Emergencies in the state. Not on DoD funded missions.

What crack are you smoking Tex? You think Texas taxes pay for all the bases in Killeen, and San Antonio, San Angelo, Lubbock, Dallas and Corpus Cristi?

Why do Texans have all those arguments about funding schools then? They could close a few bases if they fund them all.


You are missing a few meds, im afraid.


66 posted on 07/28/2006 7:41:03 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I would send you my DD214 if you knew what that is. You are full of it.
67 posted on 07/28/2006 7:42:37 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles

When was that? Your personal pages states that you REGULAR military and left same in '03.


68 posted on 07/28/2006 7:43:15 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

How much of the $128,000 funded per deployed soldier is going to the soldier and how much is going to overhead?

What's the percentage, Tex?

Are the NG soldiers bivouacing or are they staying in hotels and commuting to work?

Tell me mr expert.


69 posted on 07/28/2006 7:45:24 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles
Since WHEN us the USAF the National Guard?

You either lied on this thread, or lied on your personal page.

WHICH IS IT?


70 posted on 07/28/2006 7:45:52 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles
Here -

Asked how she'll approach the immigration issue while campaigning, Napolitano said she'll continue to call for border enforcement, employer sanctions _ "we've had no interior enforcement to speak of" _ and a guest worker program as part of comprehensive federal action.

Napolitano has said she'd expand the National Guard's existing role on the border if the GOP-led Legislature provides funding, and she said she vetoed the trespassing bill because it was unconstitutional and an unfunded mandate on local law enforcement.

71 posted on 07/28/2006 7:46:25 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

NYARNG. You Know Green Uniforms, Guns, Jeeps, Light Infantry.

C/C 1/174 Infantry. Look it up. We had SF Observers for summer camp.


72 posted on 07/28/2006 7:50:10 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Geez, maybe he was in both the AF and the NG. A very common thing among the Military.

He's not lied and you're jumping to conclusions.

73 posted on 07/28/2006 7:51:27 PM PDT by Marine Inspector (Deacon Blues!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

You have defeated your own agument and shown your idiocy.

Napolitano would not fund the guard mission and vetoed the funding and authorization bill the Repubs put before her.


Why dont you get your story straight about the Nationa Guard.

Take your meds.


74 posted on 07/28/2006 7:51:56 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles
Were you ever on active duty? Did you get mobilized for Iraq?
75 posted on 07/28/2006 7:52:01 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Both.


76 posted on 07/28/2006 7:52:51 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles

Why did she need funding if the feds paid for her state guard? Man you are dense.


77 posted on 07/28/2006 7:52:55 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

I guess you can't read my profile.

I was in the AOR 2 Weeks after 9/11.


78 posted on 07/28/2006 7:53:49 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

Read post #63.


79 posted on 07/28/2006 7:54:32 PM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles
Either you were in the National Guard, or you were in the regular Air Force.

You have one claim on your personal page and another on this thread.

Which is the lie and which is fact...neither?


80 posted on 07/28/2006 7:54:35 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson