Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hezbollah Invading U.S. From Mexico
newsmax.com ^ | 7/27/06 | unknown

Posted on 07/27/2006 5:14:32 AM PDT by beyond the sea

"We've had Hezbollah agents that came across the border with Mexico," Jerome Corsi, co-author of "Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America's Borders", told Sean Hannity during an appearance Wednesday night on Fox News Hannity & Colmes.

Appearing with co-author and Minuteman co-founder Jim Gilchrist, Corsi agreed with Hannity that border security is important for national security because Hezbollah terrorists could be coming across the border with weapons of mass destruction.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; aliens; border; bordercrisis; bordersecurity; corsi; globaljihad; gwot; hezbollah; huzziemuzziechacha; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; infiltration; invasion; islamicterrorism; israel; jihad; jihadinamerica; lebanon; mexicanborder; mexico; middleeast; muslim; muslims; nationalsecurity; openborder; terror; terrorism; usmexicoborder; waronterror; webehuzziehaters; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last
To: beyond the sea
I'm shocked, simply shocked I tell you to discover that Hezbollah operatives are crossing that sieve we call a border! /sarc.

Personally, I say create a 100 yard "red zone" where anyone caught will be shot on sight. Until we get serious about our borders we are wasting money on other security measures.

I don't buy this "they're just coming here for a better life" argument. This statement applies to legal immigrants. Illegal immigants are criminals, scoffing at our laws and at a minimum need to be punished and deported. I am all for legal immigration.

61 posted on 07/27/2006 10:38:37 AM PDT by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea; Czar; nicmarlo; texastoo; Kenny Bunk; EternalVigilance; janetgreen; hedgetrimmer; ..
Hezbollah Invading U.S. From Mexico



 

62 posted on 07/27/2006 10:46:56 AM PDT by Smartass ("In God We Trust" - "An informed and knowledgeably citizen is the best defense against tyranny")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
They may have stupid immigration policies in their country but they still do a better job of protecting their border than Mexico.

Actually, they don't. Canadian immigration law is extremely liberal; you have to work really hard to violate Canadian immigration law--mostly, you have to (a) be a convicted felon, (b) not get an exemption in advance (which takes maybe 20 minutes on the phone with the nearest Canadian consulate), and (c) you then have to actually get caught entering Canada.

Canada holds out the welcome mat for terrorists everywhere. They give them generous welfare benefits (Mexico gives none), they give them citizenship (Mexico does not), and they give them new identities in secrecy to prevent their "persecutors" (read: the US government) from finding them.

Here's the deal: there's about a 10% chance of getting caught illegally entering the US through the Mexican border. There's a less than 1% chance of getting caught entering illegally through the Canadian border--and, because the Canadian government has given known terrorists citizenship, there's no need for the terrorist to even risk "illegal" immigration into the US. The terrorists will simply come through the port of entry with their Canadian passport in hand, and be waved into the country with a smile.

63 posted on 07/27/2006 11:02:59 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

OK sure whatever.


64 posted on 07/27/2006 11:16:31 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Everybody's entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

Ping!


65 posted on 07/27/2006 11:16:31 AM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Corsi's "agenda" appears to be securing America's borders against enemies that would do us harm.

Your agenda, otoh, appears to be the precise opposite.

66 posted on 07/27/2006 11:29:17 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RochesterFan
Personally, I say create a 100 yard "red zone" where anyone caught will be shot on sight.

Aha............ Good idea, I see a 'Best Shot Awards Banquet' in the future.

;-)

67 posted on 07/27/2006 11:31:53 AM PDT by beyond the sea (The truth exists even when it is ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

Very creative!


68 posted on 07/27/2006 11:32:39 AM PDT by beyond the sea (The truth exists even when it is ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Arcy

"I have losed a fair amount of respect for the man "

...lost.... I think you meant to say.


First, I would like to say that you have placed yourself in a fairly large group. The group that blames President Bush for not closing the border.

The distinctions evident amongst this group are apparently not obvious to anyone in the group.

1. The President asked for increases in manpower to guard the border. Our Senate and Congress only authorized and increase of so many per month, below what he requested.

2. We have caught, and continue to catch invaders at the Canadian and Mexican borders.

3. That we know of, NONE have successfully gotten through and initiated a terrorist attack, since 9/11.

4. The borders cannot be just 'closed'. There is no magic lock. One can either try to penetrate our borders by getting through customs checkpoints with fake id's, or sneaking through an area where this is not a border patrol or customs checkpoint. The borders are not 'open', in the sense that everyone is free to pass, no questions asked.

Those that think the borders can be 'closed' with just a wish, or a word, are demonstrating thier ignorance of reality.

In other words, let's say you are the President.
Right now, today, you have decided to CLOSE the borders.

Please tell us all exactly how you will accomplish this and prevent anyone from going to or from either side.

You must accomplish this by the end of the day, and it must be 100% effective. Are you ready? Tell us all , we are listening.


69 posted on 07/27/2006 12:40:45 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea
We've had hezbola agents CAUGHT crossing the Mexican border. This notion that shutting down the Mexican border will prevent terrorists from entering our country is utterly ridiculous.

Did not the 19 hijackers come through our airports and/or across the Canadian border?

Since Canada is islam friendly and Mexico is anti-all-immigation, why in the heck should I believe the larger threat is the Mexican border when we all full well know it will be much easier to enter across the Canadian border?

Are the posters here aware that the reason we caught these islamafacists is because the Mexican illegals came to our guys and pointed them out for us?

Do you think the illegals do not know that if a single future terrorist succeeds in America and that his entry is traced through Mexico, the illegal gravy train ends?

Does anyone here believe that if the next terrorist is determined to have crossed the Canadian border, the U.S. will shut that border down?

70 posted on 07/27/2006 12:47:59 PM PDT by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat

To listen to the rhetoric from the all-illegal-immigration-all-the-fricking-time folks, you'd think that the guys who flew the planes into the WTC and the Pentagon were named Miguel, Jose, and Carlos...


71 posted on 07/27/2006 12:53:33 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat

"Did not the 19 hijackers come through our airports and/or across the Canadian border?"

No, they did not. Check your facts.

You worry about the Canadian border which is well-monitored and where pretty much anyone crossing outside the normal manned border crossing is at least noticed, while so many enter daily from Mexico that you have no idea who might be among them?


72 posted on 07/27/2006 12:59:06 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat
You haughtily asked five questions. Answer them YOURSELF, genius.
73 posted on 07/27/2006 1:00:14 PM PDT by beyond the sea (The truth exists even when it is ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Diplomat
And, "Diplomat" does not fit you as a screen name.... unless you are John Bolton.

;-)

74 posted on 07/27/2006 1:01:11 PM PDT by beyond the sea (The truth exists even when it is ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
You worry about the Canadian border which is well-monitored where pretty much anyone crossing outside the normal manned border crossing is at least noticed

I seem to recall that the Canadian border is about twice as long as the Mexican border, but it has about 1/5th the number of agents posted.

How does having 1/10th the patrol density make sure that those crossing the border illegally are more readily noticed?

75 posted on 07/27/2006 1:02:52 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

76 posted on 07/27/2006 1:08:43 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
lol

Fences make better neighbors sometimes.

;-)

77 posted on 07/27/2006 1:11:19 PM PDT by beyond the sea (The truth exists even when it is ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

Electronic monitoring. If you attempt to cross the border on land much of anywhere other than the normal border crossings it stands out and will be noticed. I could see maybe crossing by water on the Great Lakes, though. And Canadian law enforcement does cooperate closely with US agencies.


78 posted on 07/27/2006 1:12:44 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
Electronic monitoring.

They have the exact same stuff on the Mexican border, in the same proportionate amounts.

It has one teensy-weensy flaw: it doesn't work. The contractor did a fine job of promising a lot, charging a lot more, and delivering little.

And Canadian law enforcement does cooperate closely with US agencies.

Unless, of course, the guy in question is an Islamist who went to Canada and requested political asylum, whereupon the Canadians hide him from his "persecutors," including US intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

79 posted on 07/27/2006 1:17:29 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

I don't elieve this article. Wholly so many Lebanese have entered the US legally over the last 125+ years that almost every Hezbollah operative can enter the US legally through chain migration.

WHy bust your hump going through Mexico when a tourist visa and a ticket from Beirut thru Brussels/London to Detroit costs less and is easier to acquire?


80 posted on 07/27/2006 1:37:54 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson