Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: sionnsar
2 posted on
07/26/2006 8:05:47 AM PDT by
goodnesswins
( The Dems are so far to the left they have left America.)
To: goodnesswins
4 posted on
07/26/2006 8:06:36 AM PDT by
brivette
To: goodnesswins
Noooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5 posted on
07/26/2006 8:06:57 AM PDT by
Fury
To: DBeers
Morality and U.S. Constitution wins ping
6 posted on
07/26/2006 8:07:05 AM PDT by
jla
To: goodnesswins
Looks like we're on the way. The left liked the phrase stare decisis when it was applied to Roe V. Wade, let's see how they like it now.
7 posted on
07/26/2006 8:08:21 AM PDT by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: goodnesswins
Huh? I saw a news report this morning that hinted that this might go in the homos' favor.
8 posted on
07/26/2006 8:08:58 AM PDT by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: goodnesswins
I can see the activists now, calling the judges homophobes in black robes.
9 posted on
07/26/2006 8:09:00 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Glad to see the ink was still working in Bush's veto pen, now that he wisely used it on this bill)
To: goodnesswins; Admin Moderator
Does anyone have a working link?
To: goodnesswins
I realize this is a state court, but I still believe that Bush's conservative picks for the high courts have had a conservative effect on the lower courts, including state courts.
If Gore or Kerry had won, I think a lot more state courts would be wanting to spread their wings.
To: goodnesswins
WHOOOOOOOOOOO!
The media predicted they would go the other way.
Seattle on Suicide watch!
15 posted on
07/26/2006 8:11:44 AM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Libertina; Paperdoll; Maynerd; Bobsvainbabblings; moneypenny; Kaylee Frye; Clintonfatigued; ...
Thanks to
goodnesswins for the ping.
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
21 posted on
07/26/2006 8:16:42 AM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
To: goodnesswins
Praise God. A common sense ruling.
22 posted on
07/26/2006 8:17:30 AM PDT by
tioga
To: goodnesswins
As a Washington resident I am very surprised.
23 posted on
07/26/2006 8:20:44 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: goodnesswins
Since the state Supreme Court upheld the Defense of Marriage Act, it is the end of the line for the 19 gay couples involved in the lawsuit. The couples can not appeal the ruling as the challenge is based on state constitutional law, and the Washington Supreme Court holds final authority in the case. Only a state or U.S. constitutional amendment can reverse the state supreme court’s decision.
The lefties shouldn't have taken this one to the courts. They have locked themselves out of gay marriage in Washington indefinitely.
24 posted on
07/26/2006 8:21:44 AM PDT by
Between the Lines
(Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
To: goodnesswins
Forty-five states now have either state constitutional amendments banning gay marriage or state statutes outlawing same-sex weddings.
I honestly believe that had the gays gone for civil unions instead of gay marriage there would now be a majority of states permitting civil unions. But they got militant and demanded gay marriage so now they are stuck with little of nothing.
27 posted on
07/26/2006 8:30:14 AM PDT by
Between the Lines
(Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
To: goodnesswins
The case name is Anderson vs. King County, and can be found on the Washington State Supreme Court site. (I don't know how to post a link.) The opinion contains LOTS of editorializing, including this in the opening paragraph
Our decision accords with the substantial weight of authority from courts considering similar constitutional claims. We see no reason, however, why the legislature or the people acting through the initiative process would be foreclosed from extending the right to marry to gay and lesbian couples in Washington. It is important to note that the court's role is limited to determining the constitutionality of DOMA and that our decision is not based on an independent determination of what we believe the law should be.
30 posted on
07/26/2006 8:34:48 AM PDT by
hsalaw
To: goodnesswins
I dont think the dems will want to ride against this wave. How many states does that make it that have voted this way. I know NY did just last week.
34 posted on
07/26/2006 8:40:54 AM PDT by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: goodnesswins
Morality, Law, Common Sense...........from the state of Washington!
Pinch me!! This can't be real.....
37 posted on
07/26/2006 8:43:57 AM PDT by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
To: goodnesswins
Wow, that was quite a slapdown to judicial activists. Sure put them in their proper place, lecturing to them about the way that they are supposed to do their jobs...
38 posted on
07/26/2006 8:44:19 AM PDT by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: goodnesswins
Wow. That's unexpected good news.
39 posted on
07/26/2006 8:45:36 AM PDT by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson