Skip to comments.
Washington State Supreme Court Upholds BAN on Gay Marriage
www.ap.org
| 7/26/06
| AP
Posted on 07/26/2006 8:05:00 AM PDT by goodnesswins
Washington Supreme Court has issued ruling upholding Washington State's BAN on Gay Marriage
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: deviancy; fma; gay; gayagenda; heterosexualagenda; homos; homosexualagenda; homosexualmarriage; homosexuals; lesbians; lgbt; marriage; mpa; perversion; perverts; ruling; shitepushers; sodomites
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Libertina; Paperdoll; Maynerd; Bobsvainbabblings; moneypenny; Kaylee Frye; Clintonfatigued; ...
Thanks to
goodnesswins for the ping.
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
21
posted on
07/26/2006 8:16:42 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
To: goodnesswins
Praise God. A common sense ruling.
22
posted on
07/26/2006 8:17:30 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: goodnesswins
As a Washington resident I am very surprised.
23
posted on
07/26/2006 8:20:44 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: goodnesswins
Since the state Supreme Court upheld the Defense of Marriage Act, it is the end of the line for the 19 gay couples involved in the lawsuit. The couples can not appeal the ruling as the challenge is based on state constitutional law, and the Washington Supreme Court holds final authority in the case. Only a state or U.S. constitutional amendment can reverse the state supreme court’s decision.
The lefties shouldn't have taken this one to the courts. They have locked themselves out of gay marriage in Washington indefinitely.
24
posted on
07/26/2006 8:21:44 AM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
To: jazusamo
Same here. I don't care one way or the other about the issue (it doesn't affect me personally) but asking state supreme courts to interpret state constitutions (written by people who would have been violently opposed to homosexuality) to say that they allow gay marriage was a losing tactic. Sure, there is an aberant court over in Massachusetts that did just this, but it clearly created a backlash, the results of which are still spreading across the country.
What I'm glad about is that the tactic of using state supreme courts to do an end run around the will of the people is dying. The gays should have tried to simply go for civil unions, but by trying to bite too much of the apple, they get almost nothing.
25
posted on
07/26/2006 8:27:08 AM PDT
by
hunter112
(Total victory at home and in the Middle East!)
To: yellowdoghunter
Why? Has there been debate in favor of gay marriage on FR?
I can't believe I saw none of it if there was.
26
posted on
07/26/2006 8:27:26 AM PDT
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: goodnesswins
Forty-five states now have either state constitutional amendments banning gay marriage or state statutes outlawing same-sex weddings.
I honestly believe that had the gays gone for civil unions instead of gay marriage there would now be a majority of states permitting civil unions. But they got militant and demanded gay marriage so now they are stuck with little of nothing.
27
posted on
07/26/2006 8:30:14 AM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
To: hunter112
What I'm glad about is that the tactic of using state supreme courts to do an end run around the will of the people is dying. I'm glad for that reason also and that's what surprised me about this court.
28
posted on
07/26/2006 8:34:17 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: Between the Lines; ImaGraftedBranch
It seems the the love that dare not speak its name is finally being told to shut up.
29
posted on
07/26/2006 8:34:20 AM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Conservatives teach you how to fish. Socialists give you the fish by stealing it from the fisherman.)
To: goodnesswins
The case name is Anderson vs. King County, and can be found on the Washington State Supreme Court site. (I don't know how to post a link.) The opinion contains LOTS of editorializing, including this in the opening paragraph
Our decision accords with the substantial weight of authority from courts considering similar constitutional claims. We see no reason, however, why the legislature or the people acting through the initiative process would be foreclosed from extending the right to marry to gay and lesbian couples in Washington. It is important to note that the court's role is limited to determining the constitutionality of DOMA and that our decision is not based on an independent determination of what we believe the law should be.
30
posted on
07/26/2006 8:34:48 AM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
There have been those who don't come right out and advocate homo. marriage but they promote arguments that would lead one to believe that they are for homo. marriage.
However, they have been pretty quiet lately with all the courts coming down in favor of banning homo. marriage.
31
posted on
07/26/2006 8:37:34 AM PDT
by
yellowdoghunter
(Vote out the RINO's; volunteer to help get Conservative Republicans elected!)
To: hsalaw; All
32
posted on
07/26/2006 8:38:31 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
( The Dems are so far to the left they have left America.)
To: hsalaw
The initiative process will take over immediately on this, you can bet on it. The WA Supreme Court just gave that a green light. About the only way to diffuse that is for the Legislature to pass some sort of civil union statute. It takes the steam out of a gay marriage initiative.
33
posted on
07/26/2006 8:40:38 AM PDT
by
hunter112
(Total victory at home and in the Middle East!)
To: goodnesswins
I dont think the dems will want to ride against this wave. How many states does that make it that have voted this way. I know NY did just last week.
34
posted on
07/26/2006 8:40:54 AM PDT
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
To: hunter112
The gays should have tried to simply go for civil unions, but by trying to bite too much of the apple, they get almost nothing. Well, they'll always have each other...
35
posted on
07/26/2006 8:41:29 AM PDT
by
Snardius
To: mware
Post 27 says 45 states now....
36
posted on
07/26/2006 8:41:42 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
( The Dems are so far to the left they have left America.)
To: goodnesswins
Morality, Law, Common Sense...........from the state of Washington!
Pinch me!! This can't be real.....
37
posted on
07/26/2006 8:43:57 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
To: goodnesswins
Wow, that was quite a slapdown to judicial activists. Sure put them in their proper place, lecturing to them about the way that they are supposed to do their jobs...
38
posted on
07/26/2006 8:44:19 AM PDT
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: goodnesswins
Wow. That's unexpected good news.
39
posted on
07/26/2006 8:45:36 AM PDT
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: Mr. Brightside
Bingo!!
Bush's conservative court picks are moving the whole country to the right and quelling the leftist demands.
GOOD!
40
posted on
07/26/2006 8:46:49 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Liberation VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson