Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Staircase wrangling likely over for good [Clinton land grab succeeds]
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | 7/25/2006 | Matt Canham

Posted on 07/25/2006 9:32:44 AM PDT by TChris

The legal tussle over President Clinton's 1996 designation of a vast national monument in southern Utah most likely ended Monday.

Nearly a decade ago, Clinton stood on the North Rim of the Grand Canyon in Arizona and announced the creation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, covering 1.7 million acres including most of Garfield and Kane counties - much to the dismay of local elected officials who felt snubbed, and to those who wanted to develop a rich but remote coal preserve.

Monday, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver threw out the claims of the last remaining plaintiff, ruling the Denver-based Mountain States Legal Foundation failed to show it had legal standing to file suit. Unless Mountain States mounts an unlikely U.S., Supreme Court appeal, the case is now over.

"This is a real positive outcome," said Heidi McIntosh, with Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA), which headlined a number of environmental groups that intervened to defend the Grand Staircase. "This monument has turned out to be a real boon for the entire state."

The Mountain States Legal Foundation argued that Clinton overreached his executive authority by creating the monument, just a few months before he was up for reelection. Clinton relied on the Antiquities Act of 1906, which the foundation argued limited the size of presidentially created monuments to the "smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to be created."

The foundation had legal help from the Utah Association of Counties and the Utah Schools and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA).

The counties association bowed out after a federal judge in Utah ruled against their claims and SITLA pulled its support even earlier after Utah and federal officials negotiated a $50 million settlement. Only the Mountain States Legal Foundation, which represents grazing, mining and motorized-recreation interests, appealed.

Mountain States argued that it had standing to sue on behalf of Don Wood, who owned Southwest Stone, a company that mined alabaster on what became monument land. He failed to file his annual paperwork and subsequently lost the ability to mine. He closed his 20-year-old business in 1999.

The court ruled that Wood's actions, not the actions of Clinton or any other government official, caused him to lose his mining rights, since he didn't file the appropriate forms. And the judges found that Wood's mining troubles came more than a year after Clinton created the national monument.

Mountain States President William Perry Pendley was unavailable for comment on Monday.

The judges did not issue opinions on any of Mountain States' other claims, or those filed by the state of Utah in a friend of the court brief.

Authorized by the administration of Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., the Utah Attorney General's Office filed a brief arguing for a reinterpretation of the Antiquities Act, but not specifically challenging the creation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante monument.

"Nearly 70 percent of all Utah land is federally controlled," the brief argued. "A mere stroke of an unchecked presidential pen could send Utah reeling."

Utah is not reeling, according to McIntosh, rather it is enjoying the monument's success. Visitors are drawn to its natural arches and remote lands, while fossils and rock art are being preserved.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: clinton; environment; environmentalists; escalante; landgrab; staircase
Federal Govt: All your land are belong to us.

HAhahahahaha.

1 posted on 07/25/2006 9:32:46 AM PDT by TChris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TChris

Yeaaahhhhh.... I remember when Clinton stood on the rim of the Grand Canyon for the photo op. To get what Clinton thought was the right shot, his team cut down or uprooted twenty or thirty small to medium-sized trees.

Such a friend to the Chinese... I mean, to the terrorists.... er, I mean to the environment. Wasn't he also the first black president?


2 posted on 07/25/2006 9:37:57 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

One group that's not so happy are people like me who used to go there. Before the envirowackos pushed to "protect" the area almost nobody went there! Now that it's "protected" it has people coming to visit from all over and it costs the Dept of the Interior magnitudes more money to patrol it than before when no one knew about it!

I've seen this time after time in Utah. Nice areas where no one ever goes.. until the SUWA psychos decide to "protect" it. They are complete fools and dangerous ones as well. Total idiots whose stupid grabbing at headlines actually creates more impact to these areas.


3 posted on 07/25/2006 9:39:32 AM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

Utah is not reeling, according to McIntosh, rather it is enjoying the monument's success. Visitors are drawn to its natural arches and remote lands, while fossils and rock art are being preserved.




Right.


Now, how many 'tourists" are going to this area? Bare, rocky, arid, ugly.


4 posted on 07/25/2006 9:40:35 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris

"Land, see snatch."

5 posted on 07/25/2006 9:43:18 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChris
According to this link and others, this "conservation" has more to do with foreign campaign contributions than respect for nature:

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/riady.htm
6 posted on 07/25/2006 10:05:32 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Heh, heh, you said snatch and Clinton in the same sentence. Heh, heh, heh heh.


7 posted on 07/25/2006 10:14:56 AM PDT by Cyclone59 ("Yahyoo, he's my sisters' kid. Personally, I think he's a retard.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson