The first question I have is "how stable is the Pakistani government".
I don't think they're just going to build 50 fission bombs per year. If they added tritium production, they could build fusion bombs that would be much more destructive.
india/pakistan conflict ping.
lets see what our anti-proliferation ayotallahs say now.
good luck to India and the world. China must be really enjoying this piece.
It's lovely how Pakistan can't even feed its own people. When disaster strikes, they put their hand out faster than you can say Jack Robinson. And yet they can spend money on nuclear weapons which with the wrong government in power may find their way into the hands of the mullahs and other terrorist nut-jobs.
And AQ Khan (the Johnny Appleseed of nuclear terror) is still free as a bird.
When a piece of crap Muslim nation (Pakistan) is making that many nukes they will definitely end up selling some. One way or another some Jihadist scum will buy one or two or more. Iran may have a few nukes it purchased. Muslims with nukes are like leaving children home alone with matches and a can of gasoline
If we get going to the extent of efficiently manufacturing anti-ballistic missile defense systems, they will be less costly and faster to build than nuclear weapons. We can win this thing.
Out of their ever loving minds.
See tagline...
OMG ping !!!
WASHINGTON: Pakistan is aiming to significantly expand its nuclear weapons arsenal with a powerful heavy-water reactor that could produce plutonium for 40 to 50 bombs a year, a prominent US think tank has reported.
Activities surrounding Pakistan’s Khushab nuclear reactor have been known to India for some time, but experts at the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) are providing the dimensions of the new reactor for the first time, indicating a capacity of 1,000 megawatts or more.
This, they say, could presage a 20-fold increase from Pakistan's current nuclear capabilities of making perhaps only a couple of weapons every year.
Pakistan is currently estimated to have between 30 and 50 uranium-based nuclear weapons made over a period of 18 years. Plutonium-based weapons are said to be more compact and easier to mount on missiles.
The technical assessment by ISIS’ David Albright and Paul Brannan was posted on the Institute’s website Sunday, evidently with an eye on the US-India Nuclear deal vote later this week, but it was also reported in the Washington Post Sunday night.
''South Asia may be heading for a nuclear arms race that could lead to arsenals growing into the hundreds of nuclear weapons, or at minimum, vastly expanded stockpiles of military fissile material,'' Albright, a well-known critic of India’s nuclear program and the US-India deal, said.
The ISIS paper, while ostensibly dealing with Pakistan’s expanded program, was also headlined, ''Is South Asia heading for a Dramatic Build-up in Nuclear Arsenals?''
An unnamed Pakistani official helped amplify the concern by confirming that Islamabad was ''consolidating the program with further expansions,'' and the expanded program includes ''some civilian nuclear power and some military components.''
Albright also reported that Pakistan had made no effort to conceal the construction of the new reactor, enabling even commercial satellites to take high resolution pictures.
While the timing of the report and its affirmation by US and Pakistani analysts is manifestly aimed at raising the ante before the US-India nuclear vote, the experts also suggested the new reactor is still a few years from completion.
''Based on the apparent rate of construction, the reactor could be finished in a few years. However, nothing suggests that Pakistan is moving quickly to finish this reactor,'' they wrote.
Among the reasons they cited for the slow pace were shortage of necessary nuclear reactor components or other parts of the weapons production infrastructure, such as the rate of heavy water production, the availability of sufficient fuel reprocessing capability, or the availability of sufficient modern tritium recovery and packaging facility.
The report said ''India is likely aware of this reactor construction at Khushab,'' and asked if this had influenced New Delhi to increase its own plutonium production capacity.
''India has insisted on maintaining outside of safeguards a major reprocessing facility and a large number of nuclear power reactors in the recent negotiations,'' it pointed out.
Pakistan’s original plutonium route to a bomb was through a 50-megawatt reactor at Khushab that was built with Chinese assistance and went critical in 1998. It is said to be capable of producing about 10 kilograms of plutonium a year, enough for about two warheads.
Construction of the new larger reactor began in 2000. According to ISIS, satellite photos taken in spring 2005 showed the frame of a rectangular building enclosing what appeared to be the round metal shell of a large nuclear reactor. A year later, in April 2006, the roof of the structure was still incomplete, allowing an unobstructed view of the reactor's features.
The ISIS report said such a reactor when completed could produce over 200 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium per year, assuming it operates at full power a modest 220 days per year. At 4 to 5 kilograms of plutonium per weapon, this stock would allow the production of over 40 to 50 nuclear weapons a year.
Pakistan’s nuclear program, aside from what its now disgraced expert A.Q.Khan stole from Europe, is mostly based on help from China. According to the Center for Non-proliferation Studies, most of Pakistan’s nuclear facilities have been build with Chinese help or bought from China.
China has also supplied Pakistan with nuclear weapons, enriched uranium, heavy water, tritium and other materials and components that have enabled it to go nuclear.
Times of india
Good to know that when Pakistan finally gives into Washington pressure to fully implement democracy, Pakistan will turn into an Islamic state, then they have all the goody weapons they need.
Let anyone you think would want to know about this, know about this!
Bad but not suprising news.
Our ALLIES and Friends???
Dont Fn think so.
Outcry as border guards seize British 'dirty bomb' lorry heading for Iran
Myth Debunked - A Latin conservative tidal wave is not coming
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list. Anyone can post any unposted link as they see fit. From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.