Posted on 07/23/2006 9:36:42 AM PDT by tomzz
I am just trying to win the thread. Looks pretty good so far...
You would think these folk would learn. I mean PH posts the definition when he pings folks, for goodness' sakes!.
Isn't he the baraminologist?
Why would anyone pay any attention to anything he said about science?
It's rather like repeatedly posting ASCII bats and an rant titled, "God Hates Idiots, Too."
You have something against BS?
LOL! Sounds like the soundtrack to a standard CREVO thread after us who understand science show up and interrupt the echo chamber.
What about evolution would cause you to expect to observe a species change?
"Which is more likely? Evolution by natural selection or an invisible man in the sky directing microbiology?"
Neither
Species changes are the sine qua non of environmentalism. Without them you have to way to explain going from one cell to mankind.
But what about evolution would cause you to expect to observe a species change?
Quite a claim. Mind if I quote you? "who started at the end point and then drew his lines in reverse, then plotted the points. Yes, I realize I'm being over simplistic by quoting you.
Can't wait to see the migration maps for some plants & critters. Continental drift models against frog emergence dating leaves me wondering about the migratory habits of frogs. Thus far, looks like the rock people have veto power over the critter people. Birds crapping out eggs only take me so far.
When I asked myself the migration question about fresh water fish, I happened upon a page at a site that's been commonly used by people on the ToE side in the debates here. The piece I found was written by a Wisconsin biologist & she was talking about the populations of blue gills in a lot of local lakes. We're talking an area that was under a glacier during the last ice age... Tribes in the area operate huge game fish hatcheries. Think I should tell her or should I assume she would already know, being an expert in the field 'n all?
You can be mean when you don't want to be!
5? 5 is nowhere near the toaster, sorry - for 5, you get the commemorative DC vinyl keychain. Toaster doesn't come until 50. The record for "it's just a theory!" is 472 instances on a single thread - beat that, and you win the all-expenses-paid vacation to the DC resort in the Galapagos :)
I didn't say the whole story has been told, but that it is being told ("telling").
You can start by looking at: http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2177&program=CSC%20-%20Scientific%20Research%20and%20Scholarship%20-%20Science
One of hundreds of peer-reviewed articles showingf how DNA is confirming more aspects of TToE and filling in additional information.
You think God just shoved a bunch of nearly identical DBA in chimpanzees and humans?
http://www.genome.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/2/173
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v21/n10/full/nbt869.html
I don't make statements out of the blue, nor do I make "but it seems to me" statements when I am dealing in area which I am familiar with yet not an expert. I know I what I am saying is scientifically correct before I post.
Every CR/Ider thinks they are an expert on TToE just because they read Genesis.
*sigh* and I bet duplicates don't count...
Don't forget the contributions of Jack Chick.
I thought the Gravity story was going to include Thetans and Xenu...
Seriously wrong. You have made a serious error with the attribution of this quote--but let me give you the benefit of the doubt and allow you an opportunity to correct the quotation and give a source. I don't wish needlessly to embarrass you; but I would like to see this egregious misattribution corrected.
You have been misled by one of a number of Creationist websites that places as fast and loose with quotations as Dan Rather.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.