Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Everybody be nice.
1 posted on 07/21/2006 8:08:07 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 380 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

2 posted on 07/21/2006 8:09:27 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Helen Thomas is that old?


3 posted on 07/21/2006 8:10:36 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no substitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Could have found that out from Robert Byrd's baby pictures.


4 posted on 07/21/2006 8:10:37 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Everybody be nice.

Two words.

Good and luck. ;-)


5 posted on 07/21/2006 8:11:59 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......The Ca GOP: Where conservatives votes count but their opinions don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

It has to be tough to find the oldest evidence. Consider how few fossils of land creatures are found; extraordinary circumstances such as immediate burial by mud or cold water might allow an animal skeleton to be preserved, but almost all the time the carcass is devoured so there is nothing left at all. Nature eats the evidence of its origins.


6 posted on 07/21/2006 8:13:38 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Does "life" mean human life or single cell organisms
7 posted on 07/21/2006 8:13:46 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
While the journal is being published in late July, it will carry a date of May 2006.

For crying out loud..these guys are trying to figure out when life began billions of years ago..and yet they can't even get printing dates correct??????..

8 posted on 07/21/2006 8:15:06 AM PDT by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The scientists see light carbon inclusions in a phosphate mineral called apatite, which is also the material of which bones and teeth are made.

My teeth are made of "apatite?" No wonder I'm always hungry!

:P


11 posted on 07/21/2006 8:22:15 AM PDT by forsnax5 (The greatest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
An unanswered question is how life originally could have arisen from lifeless molecules and evolved into the already sophisticated isotope fractioning life forms recorded in the Akilia rocks.

I would think that the shorter the time frame between Earth's formation and the emergence of life, the stronger the case for panspermia.

14 posted on 07/21/2006 8:26:30 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Always nice ===> Placemarker <===
18 posted on 07/21/2006 8:29:46 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

wow more articles that disprove alot of what is said in the bible.... i think its time to write another new testament in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1..


19 posted on 07/21/2006 8:31:13 AM PDT by Element187
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Isn't it possible that the layer of rock was inhabited later, possibly much later, than its original formation and that this later habitation produced the carbon isotope differential?


25 posted on 07/21/2006 8:37:35 AM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Guillermo Gonzalez & Jay W Richards, The Privileged Planet
31 posted on 07/21/2006 8:44:21 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

At this age, doesn't it begin to overlap the age of the earth-moon formation?


46 posted on 07/21/2006 9:16:06 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
"Craig E. Manning, lead author of the new study and a professor of geology and geochemistry in the UCLA Department of Earth and Space Sciences, painstakingly mapped an area on Akilia Island in West Greenland where ancient rocks were discovered that may preserve carbon-isotope evidence for life at the time of their formation.

What stupidity. But all billion year old theory is. Carbon dating rocks is just another desperate step in the failed evolution theory. It's like finding an arrow head, claiming it's a million years old, but made from a stone that's less than a thousand. Or, finding an arrowhead I carved 20 years ago, and threw away, which was then re- found, taken to a geoligist, who then claims it's 5,000 years old, carved by an ancient indian tribe who used to live in the area. An interesting aside to this story, is that it claims greenland was much greener than it is now, which we do know is true because of the fox, rabbits wolfs elephants, rino's that are found in the artic circle on several continents, suddenly buried and preserved in ice of recent age, proving sudden global catastrophic event. Fountains of the Great Deep Lot's of info about rocks here.

69 posted on 07/21/2006 9:44:07 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

It always amazes me that life started so soon after the formation of the earth, but then took billions of years to evolve out of the single-cell stage. To me that suggests that life itself isn't the big miracle, but multi-cellular life is. If things hadn't been just so 700 or 800 million years ago, earth might still be nothing more than a big dirty ball of iron, water and germs.


102 posted on 07/21/2006 10:18:07 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

It means God had more time to make oil.


142 posted on 07/21/2006 1:04:42 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Placemarker


165 posted on 07/21/2006 5:02:48 PM PDT by b_sharp (Why bother with a tagline? Even they eventually wear out! (Second Law of Taglines))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

3.8 billion? ....reaching for eternity, because then, anything becomes possible.


200 posted on 07/23/2006 8:53:15 AM PDT by cookcounty (CHENEY / ROVE 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I heard they found a tag on a rock that said,

"Rock for Sale. 3 day old. Free DVD of Big Bang if 10 rock bought. Guarantee for 4,000,000,000 year."


217 posted on 07/24/2006 11:10:33 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson