Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

It has to be tough to find the oldest evidence. Consider how few fossils of land creatures are found; extraordinary circumstances such as immediate burial by mud or cold water might allow an animal skeleton to be preserved, but almost all the time the carcass is devoured so there is nothing left at all. Nature eats the evidence of its origins.


6 posted on 07/21/2006 8:13:38 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

"Nature eats the evidence of its origins."

In this case, like the cheshire cat's smile, nature ate but left its apatite behind. ;)


12 posted on 07/21/2006 8:23:56 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale

Amazing how nature works that way.

Can't wait for the argument,

"Excuse me, teacher, but were you there?"


16 posted on 07/21/2006 8:29:35 AM PDT by phantomworker ("I wouldn't hurt you for the world, but you are standing where I am about to shoot." ~ Quaker quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: RightWhale
Nature eats the evidence of its origins.

True, in the case of these rocks there are not many ancient rocks remaining because so much of the earth's crust has been subducted back into the mantle since the crust first formed.

35 posted on 07/21/2006 8:57:49 AM PDT by ahayes ("If intelligent design evolved from creationism, then why are there still creationists?"--Quark2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson