[Element187]

wow more articles that disprove alot of what is said in the bible.... i think its time to write another new testament in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1..

[Just mythoughts]

"wow more articles that disprove alot of what is said in the bible.... i think its time to write another new testament in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1.."

IF the Bible claimed this earth was a mere 6,000 years old then there would be a need to add to or take away. Evolutionists have not read with understanding as NOWHERE in the Bible does it give the AGE of this earth, rather it says there will be three different earth AGES, and man in flesh is in the second AGE.

[OneWingedShark]

> wow more articles that disprove alot of what is said in the bible.... i think its time to write another new testament in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1..

Actually, what this means is that life appeared closer to the creation of the world... which wouldn't contridict the Bible.

[scottdeus12]

"wow more articles that disprove alot of what is said in the bible.... i think its time to write another new testament in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2.. 1.."

What specifically in this article disproves what is said in the Bible, element?

[Rodm]

If you believe in evolution, you think you have come to know the accidental meaninglessness of your existence. This thread matters not a wit in your world.

[MHGinTN]

"... wow more articles that disprove alot of what is said in the bible." Perhaps you would enlighten me as to how this information 'disproves' what is in the Bible? Or were you merely trolling for a food fight?