Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ICONS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE SPLIT UP
The Boston Globe ^ | 21 July 2006 | Michael Levenson

Posted on 07/21/2006 5:23:47 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: HamiltonJay
I've got underwear multiple times older than that.

So many jokes, so little time!

41 posted on 07/21/2006 6:11:09 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

I believe it's worth $2.5 Mil. It must suck to be a second class citizen.


42 posted on 07/21/2006 6:47:58 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
I believe it's worth $2.5 Mil. It must suck to be a second class citizen.

VERY well said, my friend.

43 posted on 07/21/2006 6:49:20 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

No, maybe one of them had a child, and they'll spend the next couple of years trying to use the pro-marriage amendments passed in other states to get their ex-partner removed from child custody, like the lesbian couple in Ohio.

I wonder if they are finding that non-intercourse sex just doesn't have the same power to bind two people together as one.


44 posted on 07/21/2006 6:54:10 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

This will all be settled when they find out who is the "man" in the relationship. Then the Court will know who they have to screw in the breakup.


45 posted on 07/21/2006 7:03:53 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

That there is the $64M question, is it not?


46 posted on 07/21/2006 7:14:21 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Puppage; martin_fierro
I should be ashamed.

Nah. You should put me on your picture ping list! You and Marty have the best pix!
47 posted on 07/21/2006 7:17:46 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I think I agree that they don't deserve much privacy. They decided to lend their joint name to these court proceedings. They decided to go public in their quest to overturn the marriage and family laws of Mass. and eventually all 50 states. They are the ones who decided to be in the pubic eye. They are the ones who couldn't just live together in their private lives, they had to force themselves on us all and change the law in the process.

Since they had to go public in the first place, I think we all deserve to know what happened and all about their private lives. I think their split may shed light on the fact that homosexual relationships are different in some ways, and that's why their hasn't been homosexual marriage in any culture in history until recent years.

Yep, Hillary and Julie became public figures of their own choice. They can't beg for their privacy now.


48 posted on 07/22/2006 8:43:29 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson